i guess we’re now just waiting on the next time this happens
even if this is a play to avoid having to deal with a challenge should Pence and the Cabinet invoke the 25th, the Congress still has a responsibility to deal with the fact that the president incited a riot against it.
i’m not one for “this is unprecedented” hyperbole, but it is actually unprecedented for the president of the united states to openly encourage an insurrection against the nation’s elected representatives for the sake of overturning the results of an election.
this is an example of a time when the *process* is just as — if not more — important as the outcome
even if a vote to remove isn’t going to be successful, they should still take it. even if there aren’t enough votes to expel Hawley and Cruz, it should still happen. let’s leave a record.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with b-boy bouiebaisse

b-boy bouiebaisse Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jbouie

8 Jan
This is so smart. Our political leaders are absolutely terrified by the prospect of backlash — the chance that someone, somewhere, will get mad about the "undeserving" — and reverse-engineer everything they do to avoid it. newrepublic.com/article/160810…
The result, of course, are byzantine, incomprehensible rules and policies that fail and an angry public that then, yes, doesn't trust that the government can do anything.
and at the end of the day, everyone is undeserving to someone, and a government that is preoccupied with rooting out aid to the undeserving eventually becomes a government that abandons aid altogether, and only has the capacity to deal out death and exposure to death
Read 4 tweets
7 Jan
i’ll keep saying this but for example look no further than the ku klux klan, theatrical and silly and also deadly serious
we often talk about the overthrow of reconstruction as a singular organized effort, but it should be understood as something more disparate and fractured, with success tied less to martial superiority than the indifference of authorities to intimidation and violence.
a group of guys — maybe the owner of the general store, and the sheriff and some farmers who fought in the war — gets together to gripe and complain and plot a little mischief. they put on masks and grab guns and go beat up a black sharecropper or local clerk or whatever...
Read 17 tweets
7 Jan
shadi, i haven’t said anything about today being a coup. i just think it’s funny that you wrote a piece claiming that the most serious question was whether democrats would accept a trump victory, and within that piece, claimed that republicans would accept a trump loss.
and as i’ve been saying for four years, i think the proper analogies and antecedents here are found in the history of the american south, where, incidentally, coups have taken place
very funny to see someone accuse me of acting in bad faith and then writing an extended thread criticizing an argument i never made
Read 4 tweets
6 Jan
liberal voting laws helped republicans bring low propensity conservative voters to the polls and likely kept november from being a total wipeout, but rather than build on that, they just want to keep as many people from the polls as possible
“maybe we should try to win popular majorities” is apparently a bridge too far
anyway i’ll trade a single national voting day for automatic and same-day registration, a national voting holiday, free and universal voter ID, uniform eligibility rules for voting, and a formula specifying the exact number of polling places and machines per precinct.
Read 4 tweets
6 Jan
i think about this all the time. if i were s billionaire, i would absolutely not run for office. if i need the validation of a crowd, i’ll just buy it
right? give the equivalent of pocket change to a worthy cause and have a nice dinner in my honor.
Read 5 tweets
6 Jan
The Georgia results, not unlike Alabama 2017, show that there is synergy between behind the scenes electoral organizing — building the machinery to maximize turnout for your side — and confident, aggressive campaigning.
One of the things that stands out about Warnock and Ossoff is that they did not campaign as if they were afraid of backlash. And I think that refusal to take a defensive crouch was an important part of neutralizing Republican attacks.
If there are lessons for Democrats in other red states, I think these are the places to start. Constant, year-round organizing of the kind spearheaded by Abrams and begun years ago, candidates that fit the coalition, clear policies and, again, aggressive and confident messaging.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!