WhatsApp's notification to accept its new policy or lose your account is wrong on so many levels we need a short thread to talk about it

🧵👇 1/9
First this goes to show how much Facebook values their users' data over their users.

"Accept our data grab or get out" is pretty far from what consent should look like under laws like GDPR 2/9
Truth is, Facebook probably just wants your phone number 📱 (if they don't already have it) and your contacts's names and numbers. They've used dubious methods to get it in the past and this could be another way to obtain it 3/9

privacyinternational.org/report/3025/fa…
Why would they want phone numbers so badly? Because they're great globally unique identifiers. Remember: first and foremost Facebook is an advertising company. Your attention is the product 4/9
(BTW we've got great guides on how to limit targeted ads on Facebook, and tweak your privacy settings on WhatsApp if you really need to keep using them 🤫 privacyinternational.org/facebook-guides ) 5/9
Second, this is further proof that the promises @Facebook made to the EU when buying WhatsApp are long gone.

If you need a reminder: ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…
6/9
@Facebook This reflects badly on the European Commission, who've just approved the Google-Fitbit merger. Should we expect the same level of commitment from Google? 🤷‍♂️

privacyinternational.org/legal-action/e…

7/9
@Facebook Third, this is problematic for a number of users and organisations using WhatsApp for sensitive purposes, as it means your data could now be in the hands of an additional player.

For example: english.alarabiya.net/en/features/20… 8/9
@Facebook We are concerned that this announcement may push people - especially vulnerable populations - off the platform, back to using insecure communication methods such as SMS and email. The value of E2EE cannot be overstated. 9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Privacy International

Privacy International Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @privacyint

24 Jul 20
🧵[THREAD]🧵 #Covid19 We are concerned about "immunity passports" and the dangers that they can bring to individuals, communities & society.
Our worries aren't pie-in-the-sky; they are based on our & our global partners' experience working on identity and ID over the years.[1/7]
"Immunity passports" risk excluding ppl, making them unable to get employment, to travel & to risk engagements with police. This is a real danger of an D system; our research in Chile shows how people who don't have access to a system are excluded.
privacyinternational.org/long-read/2544… [2/7]
Healthcare and these types of intrusive systems are an unhealthy mix. For example, our partners @KelinKenya examined what happened when there was an attempt to introduce biometrics for HIV/AIDS treatment in Kenya and how the community reacted kelinkenya.org/everyonesaidno/ [3/7]
Read 7 tweets
17 Jun 20
[THREAD] Want to know how the Google/FitBit merger will affect you?

We have a #passnote for you. It’s gonna be fun. We promise.
Name:
Google/Fitbit merger

Age:
Gestating

Appearance:
A bit dodgy. One of the world’s biggest tech giants, trying to purchase a company that makes fitness tracking devices, and therefore has huge amounts of our health data.
I don’t get it:
Basically Google is trying to buy Fitbit. As if Google doesn’t already have enough data about us, it now wants huge amounts of health data too.
Read 19 tweets
2 Jun 20
NEW! Would you like your local government to judge you by your Facebook activity?

In our report we found out that councils in Great Britain are looking at people’s social media accounts as part of their investigation tactics. [thread and resources ahead]
privacyinternational.org/long-read/3586… Image
We found out that local authorities are now using social media monitoring in areas such as council tax payments, children’s services, benefits and monitoring protests.
Is your data fair game?

Read the full report privacyinternational.org/sites/default/… Image
Many people could be targeted, including migrant families.
@Project17UK told us that "It is common for families with no recourse to public funds who attempt to access support from local authorities to have their social media monitored."

Who is a target?
privacyinternational.org/explainer/3587… Image
Read 6 tweets
27 May 20
NEWS: Niger’s National Assembly is voting on a bill allowing the government to intercept communications.

The bill poses serious concerns, here is why [short thread]:
1. The discretion to authorise interception requests lies exclusively with the President without any judicial oversight.
2. The bill creates a Commission to review authorisations after they’ve been granted. All but one of its members are appointed by government ministers.
Read 6 tweets
10 Feb 20
[TREAD ALERT!] Right, folks it's time for your all-too-regular thread about the latest breach that has affected millions of people.
Today, we'll take a look at what's been happening in Israel. 🇮🇱
Last night, @barzik revealed in Haaretz that the entire voter registry in Israel had been leaked. That means the data of 6.4 million Israelis, including their home address and phone numbers has been up for grabs.
haaretz.com/israel-news/el…
@barzik For the record there are 8 million people living in Israel, so we are talking about basically the entire adult population of the country.
Read 8 tweets
20 Dec 19
BREAKING NEWS:
[THREAD] (1) Today, the IPT decided decided that MI5 can secretly give informants permission to commit grave crimes in the UK, including violence. Image
(2) We are relieved that two of the five judges strongly disagreed and we will be seeking to appeal this judgment.
(3) Democracy demands that our security services are answerable to parliament and the public when they are exercising such frightening powers.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!