Trump's lawyers dismissed their case, saying they had reached a settlement with Brad Raffensperger. Not only was this a lie, say Raffensperger's lawyers, who SPECIFICALLY TOLD THEM there was no settlement, but you talked to our client without our consent!

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
This is a very professional way of saying "THEY FUCKING LIED TO YOU" Image
And it immediately follows what @AkivaMCohen points out is another massive ethical problem: talking to a represented person without his lawyer. Image
Kurt Hilbert signed his name to this. Honestly, Trump fans aren't reading the pleadings why bother telling such a dumb lie? Image
So that's Hilbert saying there's a settlement, and here's the email Raffensperger attached saying NO SETTLEMENT. Image
"Can I use your pool?"

"Not while you're filing frivolous lawsuits against me."

"PURSUANT TO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WE NOW DISMISS THIS CASE"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Fleischman

Andrew Fleischman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ASFleischman

10 Jan
Great work from Jonathan Turley keeping people away from misunderstanding George Orwell by instead misunderstanding Kafka.
This is a just a dumber version of Blackman's argument, which means, in theory, it should have happened first.

Also, remarkable restraint on Turley's part comparing Trump with Eugene Debbs instead of Rosa Parks or Nelson Mandela. Image
I have seen some straw men in my time, but claiming that the theory here is that "reckless language" warrants impeachment is incredibly lazy.

Trying to stay in power despite losing an election seems like it ought to be impeachable. Image
Read 7 tweets
8 Jan
At the point where you're saying a President can't be impeached for speech that can't be criminally punished, for instance, if he said the time had come to put people in concentration camps, I have to wonder whether you understand that impeachment is a political remedy.
At that point, why not just say that impeachment is a bill of attainder?

Some have memorably said that if the electoral college were not in the constitution, it would be unconstitutional. That seems to be the argument here.
Also, if there were ever an absolutely radioactive political question that no court would touch, it would be whether the grounds for impeachment were legally permissible.
Read 9 tweets
4 Jan
Holy shit this is the most scornful order I have ever seen

ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_p… Image
Your filing was long and defective and lazy Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
4 Jan
I went through the transcript of the phone call, and I went through the OCGA, and I can honestly say that I don't identify a crime.

The closest Trump comes is solicitation to receive a thing of value for an official act, but he doesn't offer a concrete thing.
The vague threat of a crime might work if Raffensperger were an "officer of the court," like a probation officer, but here, I don't think he qualifies.
Remember that criminal laws are written by professional politicians, who create the broadest possible laws to address, for instance, possession of an imitation drug, and some of the narrowest when it comes to their own wheeling and dealing.
Read 10 tweets
12 Dec 20
Oh man the Trump campaign has filed an emergency petition to the Supreme Court of Georgia and I'm already loving the excuse for them forgetting to pay the filing fee:

"There was just so much gosh darned evidence the computers must have clogged"

drive.google.com/file/d/1EMA5VR…
Ok, so the argument here is that Judge Russell in Fulton County isn't qualified to preside over their election challenge because she's an active judge who lives in Fulton County.

She hasn't issued any rulings yet, but they want an emergency order for a new judge.
This is not great. "Lots of stuff keeps going wrong with these filings and none of it is our fault, please help."

And then, it certainly sounds like they aren't even sure they've filed a motion for a different judge.
Read 6 tweets
10 Dec 20
The Constitution specifically says that state legislatures are responsible for choosing how electors are chosen. Letting other states decide for them, or claim injury if they don't like their choice, would violate the Constitution. Image
And of course, it's not just standing here, but laches. Waiting until after the election to file these lawsuits means that tens of millions of people could lose their vote, in which they have a liberty interest, without notice or a hearing.

That also violates the Constitution.
And also, it just doesn't make sense to allow ordinary people to sue because one branch of government has usurped the power of another, without injury. We don't typically sue to vindicate other people's rights.

Conservatives understood this concept for emoluments.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!