1/ ICYMI paper on variant linking epic and genetic data: imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial… 1. the variant does appear to be more transmissible. From my read of the paper, it accounts for about a half to 2/3 of an additional infection per every additional transmission.
2/ SO for example if I have COVID and I give it to my husband, highly likely, then if I had this variant, I might also give it to 1/2-2/3 of another person - which is not physically possible, of course!
3/ I might also give it to my son resulting in 2 infections, but then the next person with the variant may only give it to one additional person, so between the 2 of us with the variant, the result is 3 additional infections instead of 2 if we were transmitting the non variant.
4/ 2. it appears that it is more transmissible in <20 year olds. however if you look at figure 4, you will see that this age group only accounts for 6-7% of the cases, compared to upwards of 15% for all other age groups.
5/ Thus it we had 100 new infections tomorrow, than the <19 age group would see 7 of those cases if it was the variant, compared to 6 of those cases if it was not. and then all the other new cases would be spread out in the >20 age category.
6/ what does this mean practically? It means you can’t let your guard down per @CorsIAQ. I recommend wearing masks at all times indoors and OUTDOORS. it means social distancing at all times. It means keeping air cleaners running and a window open a couple of inches every 30 min
7/ It means staying vigilant even when you are going to pick up food at a restaurant and take it home, or walking behind someone on the street. I would recommend these more stringent approaches even without the variant tho
8/ since we have terrible testing/tracing abilities & we are unable to get the cases down in the US. Possibly due to the variant, but also likely due to people’s behavior, poor mask wearing, not always having a mask on, sharing the air with others in your home without masks…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Shelly Miller, PhD

Dr. Shelly Miller, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShellyMBoulder

10 Dec 20
1/My public comments to the @BVSDcolorado board meeting on 12/8. I am an engineering professor @CUBoulder and an expert in engineering controls for airborne infectious diseases. @DougChem @epibuff
2/I was instrumental in helping CU Boulder open its campus safety. we have had ~50 cases of COVID-19 positive students in the classrooms and not a single case of transmission.
3/This pandemic is uniquely defined by superspreading events. These account for a majority of the cases but are caused by <20% of the infectious. This is through long-range exposure and mitigated by reduced occupancy indoors and improved ventilation and air cleaning.
Read 15 tweets
2 Nov 20
1/13 MOST HOMES ARE POORLY VENTILATED. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR COVID-19? Most homes in the US are are poorly ventilated. There is no mechanical system supplying outside air indoors and exhausting indoor air outside. Read the entire post here: shellym80304.com/2020/11/02/mos…
The way homes are typically ventilated is by opening a window and/door, or by air leaking in (or infiltrating) through unintentional openings and cracks in the building shell. Homes recirculate indoor air through coarse filters when the heating or cooling system is operated.
Why is this important? Because the risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 increases substantially when you are sharing the air in a poorly ventilated space with an infected person. The majority of transmissions happen within the household.
Read 13 tweets
15 Oct 20
1/5 The bottom line is that on school openings many districts are still operating as if it were Mar not Oct. In Mar most of us did not know how the virus was transmitted (too bad WHO did not tell us in Feb). Now we know & we know what do to do minimize airborne transmission
2/5 The goal is not to suppress every single case, but construct our indoor environments to minimize the potential for large spreading events. Schools can be safe low-risk spaces if they are following our (@linseymarr @j_g_allen @jljcolorado @CorsIAQ) recommended protocols.
3/5 That doesn’t mean that cases are not going to occur and be brought to school. What we don't want is spreading wishing school. We’re trying to support the idea that we need to live with this virus. There is not enough political leadership or will to do otherwise in the US.
Read 6 tweets
1 Oct 20
1/4 Just so you know: my entire motivation for talking about how COVID is transmitted is to keep people safe. If it was clearly transmitted via fomites, then I would be talking about washing your groceries. And that is what I would be doing (I am not)
2/4 If it was only transmitted by large spray droplets then I would focus on supporting efforts to get acrylic partitions and shields on everyone. (and I would have a shield but I don't, I do wear glasses/googles with my mask)
3/4 I am not happy that this thing is airborne, that you can inhale randomly floating viruses when you spend time indoors from some asymptomatic person w/o following suggested guidelines for reducing risk. I follow the science. (I don't share the air with others)
Read 4 tweets
18 Sep 20
Dear colleagues,
I am hiring a postdoctoral researcher for a new 3-y NSF project. The short version of the position is below and the longer version is described at this google form. Applications are accepted via this form also.
forms.gle/71B8hFHoiVw2DD…
"Postdoctoral Researcher position available in the Miller Research Group to lead a 3-y NSF funded project at the University of Colorado Boulder and work with a cross-disciplinary team of engineers, computer scientists, sociologists, community members and community organizations."
Project Title: Empowering Environmental Justice Communities with Smart and Connected Technology: Air and Noise Pollution, Social Relations and Wellbeing in Times of Disruption

Project PI: Shelly L. Miller, Professor Mechanical Engineering
Read 4 tweets
13 Sep 20
1/4 Riley et al in 70s assessed measles outbreak in a NYC school, from a 2nd-grader and spread to 60 pupils. Data on ventilation rates, time spent in classrooms, and air samples were collected. They modeled using Wells-Riley equation the probability a student would get infected.
2/4 Here is the graph showing the Probability of Infection versus ventilation rate. (source: smartairfilters.com/en/blog/poor-r…) Image
3/4 Note at the ASHRAE recommended 6.7 L/s/p for a middle school classroom (at full occupancy of 35 students), translates into 3.5 ACH. Shows increasing to 6 ACH can decrease risk to below 5% but cutting occupancy and wearing masks is really key to reducing risk.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!