This is an *incredible* piece of journalism that takes you through the route of the mob with maps and detailed explanations and timelines. Well worth checking out.
(PS) What the maps underscore is that the mob had a very specific purpose—they were trying to get to the House chamber to block the joint session of Congress. They met greater and greater resistance, in terms of both armed forces and barricades, the closer they got to their goal.
(PS2) After the mob had partially destroyed the barricade protecting the Speaker's Lobby, Babbitt, a former soldier, tried to be the first into the breach. Her intrusion, if permitted to stand, would"ve flooded the Speaker's Lobby and brought the mob quickly onto the House floor.
(PS3) The mob was armed, had already done violence, and had already overwhelmed innumerable security checkpoints. We now know some planned to take hostages. I don't know how many unarmed legislators were hiding in the House chamber when Babbitt was shot; I suspect quite a few.
(PS4) We know the protesters were *aware* that they were an entering a heavily protected, secure area where federal law enforcement had guns drawn, as you can hear one of the attackers look through the barricade and yell about "GUNS!" less than 30 seconds before Babbitt is shot.
(PS5) Keep in mind, officers were in constant contact with one another. They likely would've known the Vice President was being hunted. They may have known of the hostage plot. They would've known the mob had guns and lead pipes. The Speaker's Lobby was the last line of defense.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The "perks"? Isn't the main concern that Trump will continue to get classified national security briefings during his post-presidency unless he's impeached? It seems to me impeaching Trump is a national security issue, unless I'm missing something? @AshaRangappa_@FrankFigliuzzi1
(PS2) To those saying the briefings are discretionary, even if they are, a) Trump will ask for them, b) he'll run in '24 if not impeached/convicted, c) the whole GOP will howl if Biden yanks them without the—wholly appropriate—cover of an impeachment/conviction. It'd be v. messy.
(NOTE) This feed has promoted nonviolence since its inception. I profoundly object to any expressions of violence directed toward the Proud Boys or anyone else. As an attorney, I believe in our lawful and peaceful system of justice as being the appropriate response to any crimes.
(THREAD) Gavin McInnes—co-founder of the Proud Boys—has claimed that no Proud Boys were wearing orange caps during the Capitol assault. He may be right. I don't know. Here's a video of the Proud Boys walking to the Capitol, which I analyze in this thread.
1/
0:46 Orange cap visible
1:17 Orange duct tape visible on man in tactical gear
1:23 Orange marking on man in tactical gear (helmet)
1:29 Orange duct-tape armbands (6 Proud Boys)
The Proud Boys are using military hand signals and many are carrying backpacks. Contents unknown.
2/ It's clear from the video that a contingent within the Proud Boys' military-style march—almost exclusively men who are at the head of the column—is wearing "blaze orange" armbands. The Wall Street Journal implies the Capitol assault was initiated by men in "blaze orange" hats.
(NEW) Gavin McInnes—founder of the Proud Boys—has taken to Parler to say I and CNN are wrong about Proud Boys wearing orange hats at Trump's insurrection. He's threatening a lawsuit.
To be clear, I was working from CNN's report only. I'll now wait to see what new info comes out.
(PS) *Some* paramilitary group wore orange knit caps on Wednesday. And *some* paramilitary group wearing such caps was the first to attack the barricades. Buzzfeed News says the Proud Boys had promised to "breach the Capitol." I guess we'll see if CNN has its information correct.
(WSJ1) "The milling crowd of Trump supporters had taken his invitation to march on the Capitol, but upon arriving at the steel fencing at the edge of the building’s western lawn, they seemed unsure of what to do next. Then, at 12:48PM, a clutch of men..." google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.…
BREAKING: Major media previously reported that Trump's insurrection was initiated by a gang of men in "blaze orange hats." CNN now confirms that these were the *Proud Boys*—the very white supremacist group Trump told to "stand by" at a presidential debate. cnn.com/2021/01/09/us/…
(PS) Per major media, the first seditionists to break down barricades and charge the Capitol were wearing "blaze orange hats," which again has now been confirmed to be the means by which the Proud Boys recognized one another during the insurrection. This is a stunning revelation.
(PS2) I can't tell you how many people are writing to remind me that the Proud Boys' leader was *at the White House* on the *very day* Trump excitedly tweeted about the January 6 rally. If this timeline is correct, we now have a *terrifying* synchronicity. google.com/amp/s/amp.usat…
(THREAD) Media has yet to do a deep dive on precisely what Trump *said* in his January 6 speech in DC—a speech now called an "incitement to insurrection," and the basis for an article of impeachment coming Monday. This thread unpacks the speech. I hope you'll read on and RETWEET.
1/ First, many don't realize that while the name of the *rally* was "Stop the Steal," Trump spoke flanked by banners that read "Save America March"—Save America being the PAC Trump has used since the election to scam voters out of more than $300 million for "election defense."
2/ It appears, therefore, that the link between Trump, his opposition to Biden's January 6 certification in Congress, and the insurrectionist march on the Capitol is one that comes, incredibly, with a paper trail—as it appears Trump *paid for* the seditious "Save America March."