Probably true. But in crass political terms, the point of diminishing returns in associating with Trump's movement may have been reached. And there's a duty to posterity here. Threatening the legislative branch with a mob must be rendered an unthinkable prospect again.
You cannot do that by fencing in the Capitol or surrounding it with national guardsmen. Force will be met with more force. The only means by which that can be achieved in a lasting way are legal, legitimate acts. The primacy of the legislative branch must be reestablished.
And in more practical terms, this president has violated his oath of office and, judging from some of the statements we've seen out of regional commanders, may not even have the confidence of his own military. His capacity to act as CIC is compromised. That's unacceptable.
So, even if you're only thinking about your political position--which, frankly, is what got us to this lamentable place to begin with--the justification for not impeaching is dubious. In every other sense beyond self-interest, the justification for not impeaching him is laughable
Will such a course of action ratchet up tensions among Trump supporters. Quite possibly. But having reached the point of active insurrection and sedition, not sure we can cool things down without an overwhelming display of legal force. This must never happen again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Less than a third of doses delivered to Pennsylvania and New Jersey had been administered, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention..." inquirer.com/health/coronav…
"Gov. Phil Murphy said Friday that the state could administer more doses if the federal government would send more." nj.com/coronavirus/20…
Mitt Romney pulling no punches: “Now, we gather due to a selfish man’s injured pride, and the outrage of supporters who he has deliberately misinformed for the past two months and stirred to order this very morning..."
What happened here today was an insurrection incited by the President of the United States.”
“Those who continue to support his dangerous gambit by objecting to the results of the democratic election will forever be seen as being complicit in an unprecedented attack against our democracy.”
“I want to say to the American people, the United States Senate will not be intimidated. We will not be kept out of this chamber by thugs, mobs, or threats. We will not bow to lawlessness or intimidation.” - @senatemajldr
@senatemajldr “The United States and the United States Congress have faced down much greater threats than the unhinged crowd we saw today.”
@senatemajldr “This failed insurrection only underscores how crucial the task before us is for our republic.”
This is the sort of thing the GOP went through circa 2013 - 2016 and the press had no trouble noticing that it was a product of magical thinking. politico.com/news/2020/10/2…
"NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue said Feinstein 'offered an appearance of credibility to the proceedings that is wildly out of step with the American people.'" This claim is simply not true. Pound sand.
Left unsaid is how the minority members might have conducted themselves differently. Because when folks like Whitehouse went full Oliver Stone and Hirono accused her of homophobia, it landed with a laughable thud. The activist class wants a rabbit out of a hat.
This is a fascinating little artifact of this cycle. There's a lot to parse in here, but my fav is this little nugget: "Independents' 52% support for Barrett's confirmation is identical to what it was for the woman who she would be replacing, Ginsburg."
The cult of the independent-minded voter is a silly one. We're always tempted to paint them as the sober, clear-eyed antidote to ideological/partisan excess. In fact, they mostly vote on personality type and don't have many set policy preferences.