This remarkable embroidered tent from 19th-century Iran, now in the Cleveland Museum of Art, has been popping up on social media quite a bit over the last few days, so I thought I'd do a thread on it to brighten the twitter feeds this weekend...
It was made for Muhammad Shah, the second ruler of Iran's Qajar dynasty, who reigned from the death of his grandfather, Fath-ʿAli Shah, in 1834, until his own death in 1848.
We know it was made for Muhammad Shah as it bears his name, with the title 'Sultan-i Ghazi'. It also has a second inscription, which has been interpreted in a number of ways, but is likely to give the name of the maker, Fath-ʿAli.
The technique is known as rashti-duzi (Rasht embroidery), named for the city in the NW of Iran where is it used. Rashti-duzi most often consists of chainstitch in silk, done with a hooked needle, and applique, on (often felted or fulled) wool. Details from two V&A pieces here:
It was not only tents that were made using the technique, but all sorts of items, including saddle cloths & even portraits. The 2nd one here depicts Muhammad Shah's successor, Nasir al-Din Shah, which I photographed when it was on display at Louvre Lens. (The other is V&A).
Here's a detail of a rashti-duzi banner, probably for use during Muharram events, which I absolutely love.
The technique must have a longer history, but the earliest existing pieces are likely to be from the 1830s. Later 19th-c. examples show the adoption of European (Russian) motifs. These are details of pieces from the Alpiger collection, recently on display at the Rietberg, Zürich:
While we might now associate embroidery most readily with women, in the 19th century, rashti-duzi was largely produced by men and boys, as seen in this photograph, taken in Rasht.
There are panels which might have formed tents in other museums, such as this one in the Met, but nothing else as complete as the tent in Cleveland, which consists of two large panels, one small panel, and the roof, but is likely to have had more panels to complete the circle.
Here's a video of the tent being conserved and hung:
But how did a royal tent from Iran end up in a museum in North America? Well, that's not entirely clear, as the museum only gives us a partial provenance. Wouldn't it have been great if Sotheby's had demanded more information from Mahboubian!
When the tent was sold at Sotheby's in 1991 it was grouped together with another Qajar tent in the same lot, and the two sold for £66,000. I would love to know where this one is now, but I can't find any clues for the moment.
That's it for now, but will do my best to answer any questions!
Edit: Muhammad Shah was the third ruler of the Qajar dynasty, not the second. I'm normally writing about Fath-ʿAli Shah, who really was second and old habits die hard. (Why do I only notice these things after I've clicked tweet!)
An addition of a more complete but less grand example now in the Saint Louis Art Museum:
slam.org/collection/obj…
Also dropping this Enyclopaedia Iranica article on the handicrafts of Gilan here - such a useful resource, it has lots of detail about this type of embroidery and many other things besides:
iranicaonline.org/articles/gilan…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fuchsia Hart

Fuchsia Hart Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FuchsiaHart

22 Nov 20
In the Qur'an & Bible, Zulaykha/Potiphar's wife never gets to consummate her love for Yusuf/Joseph, but in Jami's C15th version, there is a happier ending and they marry - here's a depiction of that moment in a manuscript from C16th Shiraz. (Now in British Library.) 1/5...
The technicality which permits this is that, according to Jami, Zulaykha's first husband (aka Potiphar) wasn't able to consummate their marriage:
'He will not be able to open your silver lock,
for his key will be as soft as wax...
And lead cannot do the work of a diamond.' 2/5
By contrast, Yusuf, after their marriage:
'had a key for her jewellery box made of shining ruby,
and he opened the lock, pouring more jewels inside'.
While Jami certainly gives vivid descriptions of the consummation of Zulaykha's carnal desire, there is more to this... 3/5
Read 7 tweets
3 Aug 20
In class today, I was teaching the inscription on the Ardabil Carpet - it is this text which makes it the earliest dated carpet to survive. Seeing as there should be way more carpet content on Twitter, I thought I'd share it here too! (1/7) #carpetcontent
The first two lines are a couplet by Hafez:
جز آستان توام در جهان پناهی نیست
سر مرا بجز این در حواله گاه نیست
Except for your threshold, I have no refuge in the world.
Except for this door, my head has no resting-place. (2/7)
The next line gives a signature:
عمل بنده درگاه مقصود کاشانی
The work of the servant of the court, Maqsud-i Kashani (3/7)
Read 9 tweets
28 Jul 20
Today, I've been writing a bit on Sultan Murad Mirza Husam al-Saltana (1817-1883), a governor of Khurasan. There's a wonderful portrait of him, so I thought I'd do a thread on some of the notable features of the painting to bring some Qajar style to your timeline this evening...
The artist is Abu'l-Hasan Ghaffari (1814-66), 'naqqashbashi' (head-painter) at Nasir al-Din Shah's court. He painted some of the most iconic works of the era. You might be thinking it all looks a bit staged - this is because he often painted from photos, rather than from life.
Husam al-Saltana was grandson of Fath ʿAli Shah. His father was ʿAbbas Mirza, Fath ʿAli's son & heir who predeceased him. Husam al-Saltana was a prominent figure at court during the reign of Nasir al-Din Shah - here he is wearing the Order of the Royal Image (timsal-i humayuni).
Read 5 tweets
20 Apr 20
#Ramadan2020 is on the way, but I've recently been reading a bit about Ramadan in the early-19th century in Iran. I think most non-Muslims probably associate Ramadan with not eating, but what about not smoking your shisha (qaliyan) or opium pipe?
The shisha pipe was pretty much a permanent fixture of life in early Qajar Iran. It was smoked everywhere and at anytime - from when in the mosque, to while on horseback. Fath-ʿAli Shah is often depicted with his pipe at his side.
As a small aside - there was a particularly beautiful type of qaliyan made in Shiraz at the time, which had small metal, enamelled flowers pressed into the inside of the 'vase' of the pipe using long pincers when the glass was still soft.
Read 10 tweets
19 Mar 20
It's #Nowruz tomorrow, and as many won't be able to celebrate as normal, I thought I'd use a thread to take us all back to Nowruz Fath-ʿAli Shah style (this related by George Fowler in his 1841 'Three Years in Persia').
As you can imagine, there was lots of ceremony, and it would be a v v long thread if I mentioned it all, so this will just be some highlights. But, first, a quick note on the timing of the festival, which Fowler clearly appreciates:
He goes on: 'The Shah's splendour on these grand occasions has been described to me as perhaps the most gorgeous display in the world. The immense riches of the crown jewels would buy a kingdom... he seems made up of diamonds, pearls, and all the sparkling stones in the world.'
Read 7 tweets
3 Mar 20
We're seeing lots of reports regarding continued pilgrimage to #Qom, despite the #coronavirus outbreak there. It's horrible to watch Iran go through yet another crisis, but I also can't help but think about the historical parallels.
Pilgrimage & contagious diseases have history, and many of the 19th century sources I use in my research on these shrines mention disease, so here is a (brief) long view on pilgrimage in the time of #Corvid19
The most common disease in 19th-c. Iran was cholera, but there were also plague outbreaks, the worst being 1830-31. Of course, plague largely spread through movement of people, and pilgrims inadvertently took disease to the shrine cities, such as Qom and Mashhad, with them.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!