Donald Trump will be an exception to the main problem with Twitter bans: they are routinely and overtly evaded. This is a problem of both policy and capacity.
Policy:
* make it a violation to knowingly promote banned accounts.
* if you use human capacity, as well as algorithms, could track the ways #myfirsttweet that banned accounts try to recover their followers quickly.
Capacity: the key issue.
On 9th January 2021 the same notorious antisemite that had been banned > 30 times when I wrote a July 2019 piece about it (and gave Twitter a dossier compiled by others) has a new #myfirsttweet tweet boasting about being a banned user.
It would be exceptionally useful if media talking about Twitter bans could mention this capacity issue of whether enforcement is going to be voluntary.
A single civic minded user of this site identified 33 further respawns of this notorious anti-semitic banned user since Sept 2019 (supplying regular reports to Twitter). Gets zapped more efficiently than pre-2019 though Covid pressure slowed the public reporting system down a lot
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tonight, @MaajidNawaz & @simondolan are among 10 signatories on an open letter to the FBI and M15: it alleges lockdown policies result from a global plot by the Chinese Communists, alleging malpractice & corruption by WHO, Imperial College, western govts & many others
I am not sharing this letter for many reasons. I would advise others *not* to do so
* Authors not scientific experts at all (eg Nawaz, Dolan
* Its tone is lurid & unbalanced
* Can't judge all the content, but would anticipate people & institutions may consider it defamatory
My strong advice would be to *not* share the letter without legal advice, given its many v.serious allegations about such a wide range of targets. If responsible media outlets report on its existence, claims or criticisms in response they will take legal advice before publishing
I was watching footy today & did not hear @LBC where @MaajidNawaz appears to have justified the violent insurrection in America as the "only option" people had. Nawaz promotes unfounded conspiracies about electoral fraud that US courts & Congress rejected
I listened to Nawaz show yesterday & praised the moderate tone which seemed to be a + result of editorial oversight. He did not repeat his Lockdown Kills polemical misinformation at all. But he didn't discuss his views on the US conspiracy theories on Sat
On 11th November, Nawaz committed to accept the outcome of the legal process in America. Since then, he has a fair claim to have been the UK's most prominent & persistent champion of a great many unfounded conspiracy theories about the US election.
I began producing a weekly Friday memo on attitudes during Covid as lockdown began. But I did not foresee producing 37 of them, nor to be carrying on in 2021.
Here is the first edition of 2021 from @jake_puddle and I. (PDF). Key points follow in thread
A new year began with gloomy news of a new national lockdown - but with a broad public consensus that it was necessary, by 85% (62% strongly) to 11% opposed (6% strongly). As throughout 2020, older people were more strongly pro-lockdown than young adults (with 1 in 6 opposed)
Among general public, partisanship effects are pretty weak. Conservative support is 87-13 (+74), Labour support is 91-7 (+84). But age effects cross-pressure the mild tendency to more scepticism among Conservatives or Leavers. (Young + politically disengaged more sceptical too)
Something curiously absent from discussion of Marine v Tottenham is any reflection on the local giant-killing upset of the 1981 Crosby by-election, a dramatic win for the SDP in this safe Tory seat on the Mersey!
The Conservatives won Crosby back in 1983, holding it through 1992, before New Labour took it 1997-2005, ahead of boundary changes.
Bill Boaks got 36 votes in Crosby, before setting a still extant record with 5 votes in Glasgow Hillhead on his next outing. The navy officer stood as the Democratic Monarchist Public Safety White Resident candidate.
Crawley lead Leeds 3-0. Their beating Leeds today would be their first FA Cup win over top flight opposition - and I think registers as the biggest FA Cup shock in Sussex since Everton lost 5-2 at Brighton & Hove Albion of Division Three South in 1924
Crawley were 5-3 down in extra-time when they won 6-5 at Torquay in the first round bbc.co.uk/sport/av/footb…
A bid for a Surrey giant-killing in Sussex, with Walton and Hersham of the Ishtmian League winning at third division Brighton during the brief reign of Brian Clough in 1973
I assume everybody is annoyed by holding the fourth and fifth round draws together. Can the practical gains really be worth it?
(They are playing the 5th round midweek, 3 weeks after the 4th round)
It adds to the sense of a going through the motions simulation of the FA Cup tournament, which hopefully will change when we get towards the quarter-finals
If you had to do this, might as well have drawn the whole thing in the third round and pretended the FA Cup is a tennis tournament this year?