This is wrong. Just wrong. Eliminating Section 230 would remove the means by which Twitter and any site that has third party content CAN AND DO moderate content.
“People could still discuss politics, until someone sues Twitter because I called them a belligerent raccoon for deliberately misrepresenting the pay-go rule.”
The end of Section 230 is the veritable end of third-party user content, because no one can afford that level of liability protection and would sooner blow it up than risk hundreds of lawsuits per second.
There’s not a commission on earth that will convince the people who want to believe Trump secretly won because he had boat parades and they don’t know anyone who voted for Biden otherwise.
What’s weird is that in 2012 there was a lot of “Romney will win by a landslide” pieces in conservative media and elsewhere and somehow that did not resulted in a hamclammered storming of the Capitol led by a credit card fraudster and helped along by Holocaust deniers. Huh.
Parler has an extremely strict TOS and requires you submit your Social Security number to access some services and submit a selfie and a photo of your drivers license in order to direct message people.
This is a photograph that neatly helps to explain why the First World War was the abject trash fire it became. (Tsar Nicholas II on the left, King George V on the right)
Millions of people died horrifying deaths because one family had some drama and one chauffeur reversed at a very inconvenient time.
World War One:
England, Germany, France, Russia, Austria-Hungary: we are friends and advanced nations, we do not want to go to war, the Schlieffen Plan is just for funsies
Gavrilo Princip: :: throws bomb ::
England, Germany, France, Russia, Austria-Hungary: well fuck