I am very conflicted by this announcement. Taiwan is an important unofficial partner, a major economic and security partner, making robust engagement a vital US national interest.
@usasiapacific and #AIT team has done incredible work strengthening US-Taiwan engagement over the last four years, and has much to show for its efforts.

They accomplished so much, despite the lack of diplomatic recognition and restrictions on engagement. BZ
Arbitrary restrictions on engagement harm US interests and belittle our valued Taiwan friends, at no gain to either, and potential harm to both.
China should not be the deciding factor in determining interests and achieving US objectives. China does not take foreign preferences into account when it makes policy that affects US interests. Neither China, nor the US can or should veto the other's policies.
I think removing arbitrary restrictions is the right approach, but this is not the right time.

A blanket statement such as this, abrogating all of the guidance in place for years, without articulating what framework will replace it simply amplifies perceived chaos in DC.
I don't know if the decision took into account the potential negative impacts on Taiwan, whether @iingwen was consulted, and whether Taiwan is prepared for the pressure and retaliation that Beijing might impose on them. DC will have to back Taipei up to maintain credibility.
It would have been more meaningful to have comprehensively reformed US engagement policy to reflect US values and interests, then implement those practices for years, establishing new, positive norms benefitting both the US and Taiwan, while maintaining X-strait stability.
It is a good thing badly done, four years too late.

A move that can be reversed with little effort in a few weeks, incentivizing Beijing to apply pressure and coercion on the new Administration, effectively inviting them to interfere in US policy-making.
The Biden Administration has the opportunity to re-look Taiwan engagement practices and should do that to suit US interests.

The Biden Admin must prioritize maximizing the benefits that US-Taiwan relations can bring, not minimizing the objections and threats that China makes.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Thompson 唐安竹

Drew Thompson 唐安竹 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TangAnZhu

12 Sep 20
Is China socializing its people to prepare for war?

H/T @niubi for highlighting a recent meeting of the Central POLITICAL and LEGAL AFFAIRS Commission which uses the term “战” – "war" - 16 times (and Xi Jiniping 18 times).

A THREAD

legal.people.com.cn/n1/2020/0910/c…
CCP political discourse constantly uses the “war” metaphor, partly because of its historic and cultural perspective that all relationships are a form of struggle.

/2
China’s gov’t regularly declares war on social challenges – war, pollution, food waste, drugs, etc.

(It’s not just China – remember Johnson’s war on poverty in 1964).

/3
Read 16 tweets
16 Aug 20
Excellent piece by my friend @WonkVJ explaining why Biden is going to invariably disappoint us on China policy, bringing the US back to an era of “balancing cooperation with competition.”

Take that tack, and the US will end up without cooperation, even less competitive.
The elusive search for liberal reformers to empower through engagement with their illiberal leaders.
Whithering criticism from 🇦🇺:

Beijing offers a grand historical bargain on climate change. This is the equivalent of selling the Brooklyn Bridge, but a Democratic president finds it irresistible. The grand bargain never requires Beijing to do anything.

theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/2020-…
Read 7 tweets
26 Jun 20
Peking University's @SCS_PI observed two U.S. Navy P-8 Poseidon aircraft, one P-3C and a U.S. Air Force RC-135W Rivet Joint reconnaissance aircraft was operating to the South of Taiwan in the Bashi Channel.

One P-3C? Whose is it? It's probably Taiwan's.

A thread. /1
The tweet did not mention that they were accompanied by a @usairforce KC-135R refuelling aircraft, enabling the planes to stay on station longer than if they could only rely on their internal fuel tanks.

Yes, USAF can refuel a @usnavy P-8! Air-Sea Battle lives!
/2
My friend and colleague @RSIS_NTU here in Singapore, @ollisuorsa, wryly asked in a re-tweet, “Is there something ‘interesting’ moving underwater?
/3
Read 23 tweets
14 Sep 19
H/T to @benjaminbland. London Stock Exchange’s response to HKEX is blunt, with a number of uncomfortable truths for HK.
“We [London] were very surprised and disappointed that you [HK] decided to publish your unsolicited proposal within two days of our receiving it.”
“We recognise the scale of the opportunity in China and value greatly our relationships there. However, we do not believe HKEX provides us with the best long-term positioning in Asia or the best listing / trading platform for China. “
Read 16 tweets
5 Jun 19
Lots to unpack here. Looks like Taiwan is investing in not only replacing its amortized M-60 tanks, also buying large numbers of munitions, too. reuters.com/article/us-usa…
TOWs, Javelins and Stingers (Man-portable?) compliment the new tanks, and are already in inventory. New missiles are a layered defense that will challenge any invading force, consistent with Taiwan’s asymmetric Overall Defense Concept. Good call @iingwen !
China will undoubtedly react when the actual Congressional Notification comes out, and possibly more stridently than they have in the past. The overall deterioration of the bilateral relationship virtually guarantees it. Beijing’s turn to nationalism doesn’t bode well either.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!