With dark money groups stoking mob rally, SCOTUS takes case where dark money cabal plans to create dark money right. Sometimes evil rampages, sometimes it creeps. law360.com/compliance/art…
I’m going to go on about this a bit because it’s really important. Fact: Big dark-money entities have started claiming a constitutional right to dark money anonymity and “pled the First” refusing to answer congressional oversight questions. It’s real.
Their problem is this: to get around the corruption consequences of unleashing unlimited money, Citizens United 8-1 required (but never enforced) transparency. Only Thomas said anonymity was protected over transparency.
But since then, dark money forces have put Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett onto the Court, which makes 4 with Thomas; and Alito would likely flip to help Republican dark money crowd. That’s a majority for a new constitutional right to dark money.
Becerra is the first step down this path. It’s a highly technical case about sharing IRS 501c3 donor info with state authorities. 501c3 organizations don’t spend money on politics, but their 501c4 arms do.
Dozens of dark-money amici swarmed this case asking the Court to lay some predicates for that “right” they assert.
Indeed the “AFPF” in AFPF v. Becerra is Americans For Prosperity Foundation, the “charitable” arm of the notorious Koch-funded dark money network.
That network both gives and receives dark money to wield political power and run political covert operations (like climate denial and court capture) in the U.S.
The dark-money amici say in briefing they don’t mean political dark money, but that’s not what they assert to Congress’s questions.
And what is “political” dark money? Anonymously funding fake science to provide propaganda against climate legislation? “Issue” ads lying about carbon emissions?
SCOTUS is now The Court That Dark Money Built, and here comes the dark-money armada in droves to push dark money rights. SCOTUS held Becerra suspiciously long, and took it once Barrett was on, on a day world was focused on Capitol sacking. Expect bad things.
We’ve just experienced the overt dangers of a noisy attack on our democracy by a violent mob; the covert dangers are even greater of stealth attack on our democracy by secretive dark money interests.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Senate needs to oversee federal investigation of the attack and ransacking of our national Capitol, through Judiciary and perhaps Homeland Security. We may also be the client in federal civil suits for damages and for restraining orders, likely also under Judiciary purview.
The Senate will need to conduct security review of what happened and what went wrong, likely through Rules, Homeland and Judiciary. The Senate Ethics Committee also must consider the expulsion, or censure and punishment, of Sens. Cruz, Hawley, and perhaps others.
Because Congress has protections from DOJ under separation of powers, specifically Speech and Debate Clause, significant investigation will need to be done in Senate.
The Biden administration will govern for every American as they steer the country through a number of urgent crises: a once-in-a-century pandemic, a lopsided economic disaster, a dramatically changing climate, and a reckoning for racial justice.
The work begins immediately to ensure every American can get affordable health care, a quality education, and a job that pays a living wage.
President Trump has wielded the power of the presidency toward one goal: to turn Americans against one another. There is hard work ahead of us to bring the country together again and repair America’s standing in the world.
Something is not right around the Supreme Court and #DarkMoney has a lot to do with it. Follow the money around Supreme Court nominees.
One lane of dark money activity is through the conduit of @FedSoc. It is managed by a guy named Leonard Leo, and it has taken over the selection of judicial nominees.
Then in another lane, we have again anonymous funders running through something called the @judicialnetwork, which is run by Carrie Severino, and does PR and campaign ads for Republican judicial nominees.
Suddenly after my presentation, Republicans actually want to talk #DarkMoney! I’m excited. Here are a couple bills to get us started:
My DISCLOSE Act, to require public disclosure of the big anonymous donors drowning our politics in dark money. Bill applies to both sides – left and right. Problem solved.
Or my Judicial Ads Act with @SenFeinstein, that would require big dark money groups seeking to influence our courts to disclose their donors. Also applies to all sides.
We know bad actors behind climate denial; we recently examined bad actors behind Court capture; there’s news reporting of bad actors behind the Republican voter suppression apparatus; & we know pretty well who funds most Republican politics. No surprise: it’s the same crew.
The blood pumping through that beast is dark money; expose that & the beast shrivels. The beast knows this. So the race to capture the Court is also a race to establish that dark money is protected by the 1st Amendment rights of association & petition. newrepublic.com/article/156172…
That seems ludicrous, & it only got Thomas in Citizens United, but he’s the dark money crowd’s leading indicator. This theory now pops up all over the right wing’s ideology hothouse, & dark-money entities have begun “pleading the First” to questions. scotusblog.com/case-files/cas…
Wow — quite a confession. “Tremendous investment,” indeed. But not just time — money too, covertly, in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Hmmm, I wonder why... foxnews.com/politics/behin…
McGahn: working on this were “at least six, sometimes as many as 10... very serious people... who knew what they were looking for...." You bet they did. After all, they were “shaping ‘the future of the country’ in... ‘an increasingly wide range of issues’" for big secret donors.
Now dark-money-funded Carrie Severino (see @judicialnetwork in our Captured Courts report) runs "a large team of extraordinarily talented lawyers” who know what is wanted at “the intersection of law and public policy” and will “do it right." democrats.senate.gov/dpcc/press-rep…