Effective board directors are something I have harped on for a very long time. Having good people at the very top matter. They must be doing their fudiciary duty to protect the company & being that check & balance for shareholders. This is a thread from my experience:
(1) Composition - often we hear about gender diversity. We need to add experience diversity too. People outside the company’s industry, asking the most basic question, from different perspective. Asking why are we doing this is a powerful question, but not asked often enough.
(2) Duties - Board members must know their role is strategic, not operational. They should be asking “how is this company going to look like in 5 years”, rather than “what did you discuss at management commitee last week”.
(3) Obligation - board members have a fiduciary duty to act on behalf of ALL shareholders. Not just the major s/holder. If major s/holder asks to do something stupid, directors must say No. It’s a slippery slope once you start.
(4) Accountability - If something were to happen to the company, the legal accountability lies with the directors. The Board is the one who should ensure oversight of company & management. Directors have access to every all company statements to make an informed decision.
(5) Risk Management - Board should be asking what could go wrong with the company. Often, boards are fed with good news, rarely do they play devil’s advocate and ask why / what. Must be prepared for the unexpected.
(6) Supportive - Best ones I have worked with are those that supported me but were equally tough in expressing their opinions. When CEO loses Board support, that’s it. Board is not there to run the company, more to govern it.
(7) Preparation - the responsibility required of Board members is tremendous. Not many understand that. Opening your Board pack at the meeting does not shout preparedness on your part. Often these people are silent in meetings too.
(8) Evaluation - Just like how we evaluate management performance, there must be mechanism to see how Board members perform every two years. It’s not a position for life. After a while, Board members can develop Stockholm Syndrome too, being love with company, mgmt & themselves.
(9) Learning - There must be willingness to learn. Being Board member means knowing everything across the board but not too deep, and not too technical. Ability to ask right strategic questions (bigger picture) at right time
(10) Stand - Directors should be willing to make an unpopular stand against others when they believe in something, and have that minuted down. Problems start when all directors nod in unison when chairman says something. This goes back to culture, how we pick people for positions

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jalil Rasheed

Jalil Rasheed Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jalilword

10 Jan
(1) When you don’t communicate policies effectively, somebody else will, albeit incorrectly. This is called rumours. This is made worse during information vacuum, the period between saying you’ll announce something, and actually announcing it.
(2) Content - The government is in a position to control the narrative, avoid panic, minimise misinformation - how rumours starts. Govt also controls most media machinery - this should be simple.
(3) Audience - Govt must understand that vase majority of population are common people who are earn wages. They want to know how closures will affect them, their wages, their families. It’s day by day survival for many.
Read 9 tweets
8 Jan
(1) Logistics - Geographically brilliantly located. We have the busiest sea route next to us. Rather than trying to compete with Singapore, should aim to complement them.
(2) Islamic Finance - we do good job at front end. Almost non existent at back end. Until today I struggle to find a company that can do shariah USD custodian / trustee services. The biggest money is the recurring income business, but back end and not always sexy.
(3) People - despite brain drain, we still have many brilliant minds. This must be marketed when we attract companies. With good training many will rise to occasion. We are also English speaking nation, big advantage over many countries in region.
Read 4 tweets
8 Jan
Indonesia has 270m population, naturally the economics makes a lot of sense. Companies setting up there are driven by sheer size of the market, or potential middle income group. Long term game, some succeed, many fail.
Doing business in Indonesia is not easy given its federated system. Governors & mayors are powerful, and there are different rules in different places. Logistically too Indonesia is challenging (if you are doing consumer related business). But there lies the opportunity
Indonesia still has long way to go in making business easier to operate. The bureaucracy too much. But because of the large market, many willing to stomach this for the longer term.
Read 4 tweets
8 Jan
(1) When it comes to attracting companies to set up here, we must know what edge we have. Do we offer good legal protection? Do we offer good talent? Is the eco system present?
(2) Singapore is an expensive place to operate, but many high tech companies are willing to stomach this in return for IP protection espcially those in heathcare & technology sectors
(3) Trade perspective, Singapore also has agreements in place to allow seamless exports / imports of products. Housing an operation here can make sense from tax & legal perspective
Read 7 tweets
8 Jan
Several reasons:

(1) There is a huge funding gap in early stage & Series A in Malaysia. If this is not addressed, you won’t find companies making it to Series B, C & beyond
(2) Many agencies locally giving out grants. But issue is not co-ordinated. Some have PE like criterias when assessing VC opportunities. The mismatch between reality & expectations. It is then that we start losing to other countries
(3) When approaching VCs, must be prepared to lose 90sen of every Ringgit invested. That one unicorn will outweigh all losses, like how Grab has been for Temasek (which explains why they are headquartered in Singapore)
Read 6 tweets
3 Jan
(1) The issue of HSR cancellation - the only annoying thing is the compensation we’ve had to pay. Otherwise not a great deal of loss, given the cost and priorities we should be spending money on given current circumstances
(2) The cost of the project was massive, which required the train fares to be priced on the high side, to make commercial sense. The thought that HSR will replace air travel between KUL-SIN is misplaced too. HSR wont be mass market travel but more towards a niche travellers
(3) Taking London-Paris Eurostar as example, it is efficient because of seamless border control at both sides (perhaps trickier now that UK is not EU). Passengers willing to pay the premium. As result London-Paris flight are barely mentioned as form of travel
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!