Stream of consciousness thread. Excuse the typos coz I'm not reviewing and not editing, just tweeting as it comes
I think what's happening in the United States is that the country is correcting its identity. The United States for many of its people was already and since its founding a white supremacist country. The United States is adopting a new identity and those left behind are rebelling
Just check what happened last year. Monuments being torn down = old heroes being abandoned. Sports clubs and military bases being renamed. What it means to be an America is being renegotiated by a new generation who are appealing to the promise of equality under one nation
So many Americans, mostly white but not only white, were raised under the idea and identity that this is a nation of white people for white people, with some non-whites being allowed a place under the sun if they accept and endorse white supremacy. They don't like this
This change or shift in identity is intergenerational, it started perhaps in the 1960s. After I started thinking that this is a shift in identity, I came across Baldwin saying about the same thing in 1965 in that famous debate. "If this country is to adopt a new identity..."
Identity is more fundamental than politics, tech policies, public spheres, etc. All of the conversations happening about the politics of the moment, the legality, big tech, online moderation etc are sub-plots of the larger story of a change in identity
What it even means to be an American, what it means to be a patriot, what America even is, all of this is being negotiated in what feels like another civil war (without the war). When pro-Trump folks say "we want our country back" they actually mean it, it was "their country"
All of this is why I think conversations on how to avoid or reverse radicalization, how to keep online spaces inclusive, what kind of policy agenda to pursue etc are on their own inadequate unless the big issue is acknowledged and adopted as a framework. This is a new America
For all the talk about going back onto the world scene, what America is more likely to do (and needs to do) is to turn inwards as it maneuvers itself past this very important moment of its existence. It's no longer a colony of white colonialists on stolen land. It's maturing
I mean history is history and you can't change the fact that America started as a white colony on stolen land, but I believe that psyche lingered on. That psyche is shifting towards one that actually conceives of itself as something new, while also acknowledging its history
Zooming out. 500 years ago a bunch of Atlantic (i.e. "Western") European nations trying to circumvent the Ottomans ended up discovering a half-planet that was open for them to exploit. The resulting half-millennium brought lots of progress but also lots of inequality
Every ideology and paradigm developed in the last 500 years was developed in the shadow of that enormous event in human history. The "old" world's cultures were mostly neck and neck, then suddenly the "West" shot so far ahead of everyone and created an unjust world order
We're on the comedown from those heady 500 years now. The world is balancing out again, returning to its natural state where its cultures are, as they should be, neck-and-neck. The theories of supremacism that sought to explain & justify the inequality are crashing as they must
End of thread and now I get to read it and get horrified at wtf I wrote
Ok, not as horrible as I thought. I'm not an American of course but find the MENA to be a weird parallel. In America, "most of us only came here a few centuries ago, how do we co-exist as equals?" In the MENA, "most of us have always been here, how do we co-exist as equals?"
I hope this change in identity portends a change in identity of humanity as a whole. We are all one race (the human race) and we share one home (earth). A random human being in Bolivia or China or Indonesia is a sister or brother and their life is not worth more or less than mine
It's a day later and this thread has received a lot of attention so I just want to add two points:
- These things play out over decades, not years
- There will be a violent backlash and it may last for a while, depending how it's handled
Remember to never compromise on any human being's dignity, especially your own but including your "enemies". This long fight isn't worth it if we end up leaving people behind. Nobody gets left behind, not even "them".

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with İyad el-Baghdadi | إياد البغدادي

İyad el-Baghdadi | إياد البغدادي Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iyad_elbaghdadi

11 Jan
Some morning thoughts: Going from the power of large corporations to the power of large governments doesn't really solve the problem, just like going from the power of large governments to the power of large corporations doesn't solve the problem
It's true that governments can (and should) be far more democratic than corporations, but if we learned anything from the last 5 years it's that even well-established democracies can be taken over by extremists. The more powerful the government, the more damage they can do
Imagine if Twitter was "nationalized" in 2015 and then Trump elected in 2016. Like I said above, going from all-powerful corporations to all-power governments, or the reverse, doesn't solve the problem.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
The fact that so many people interpret platform moderation as "censorship" shows just how poorly the average person understands the fundamentals of free speech and the public sphere. So many people seem to have an 8th grader's understanding at best.
Forget the government vs private platform distinction; even with the legal right to free speech, "free" does not mean "absolute". Even in the US, free speech stops at a constitutionally drawn line, "imminent lawless action".
And that's a government. Platforms like Twitter are governed by another paradigm, that of the public sphere. A healthy public sphere is meritocratic, facts-based, inclusive, competitive, and representative. We don't have to be at 100% health but we can try for 51%.
Read 5 tweets
9 Jan
Here's the thing. Sunlight isn't always the best disinfectant, sometimes it just makes the weeds grow thicker and stronger by giving them legitimacy and a platform
Good ideas don't always drive out bad ideas, otherwise we wouldn't be here 70+ years after the fall of the Third Reich still arguing against literal Nazis. Some bad ideas live as zombies because people aren't always rational
And don't @ me, I lost my country and livelihood and nearly lost my life for the sake of my right to free speech, I won't be lectured by those who never as much skipped lunch for their right to free speech
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
Someone should do a PhD about people from minority backgrounds who joint white supremacist groups because they have such a deep complex of identity that they embrace and desire white privilege
Imagine feeling so fundamentally inferior to white people (and accepting that at normal and proper) that you seek the approval of white supremacists by becoming a literal white supremacist
And for the record, these specimens are fully embraced by (smart) white supremacists. Nothing like a member of the group you hate validating your worldview. You also get to say "hey we're not racists, coz this guy is with us"
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
Summary (of two decades):
1. We have more agency than some people think. Ultimately nobody can deradicalize you but yourself
2. We do not have as much agency as some others think. Lots of contextual factors beyond our control influence our choices, often without us noticing
Two failed paradigms that if not abandoned, will make this worse:
1. It's solely and singularly your choice and nobody and nothing influences that choice, so no point looking at contextual factors
2. It's entirely down to contextual factors, you have no agency and no choice
Human action is more complex than that, and radicalization is human behavior. If we try to understand it with a flawed model of what human beings are and what makes them tick, we'll be making this much worse. The stakes are very high.
Read 5 tweets
9 Jan
I was radicalized 17 years ago, in the wake of the Iraq War. But I was never recruited and never became an active member of any group. The reason? The online forums which I frequented were taken offline. If they weren't, my life would have taken a very different path.
Radicalization thrives in communities of identity and grievance. You surround yourself with people who echo back to you what you already desperately want to believe. But you also adjust your own beliefs in order to "fit in". You compete in showing your allegiance and purity.
The actual truth doesn't matter, what matters is the group's truth, which serves as a marker of belonging. You join the group by believing its truths and disbelieving the truths of the out-group. The harder you do that the more you "belong".
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!