Over the most recent recorded 7 day period, the UK has suffered the world's second highest rate of Covid-19 deaths/million. Considerably worse even than the US. statista.com/statistics/110…
Why is our death rate so high? Because we have an incompetent, irresponsible government, without a clear strategy, constantly surprised by events, that put more effort into enriching its chums than into crushing the disease.
It handed crucial tasks to profiteers and appointed unqualified people to highly sensitive roles (eg head of test and trace). Even to this day - and this is the crucial fact - it has *no plan* for ending the pandemic. Just a string of reactive, disconnected policies.
So we have the worst of both worlds: a public health catastrophe and a social and economic catastrophe. Taiwan has twice our population density. But, without any lockdowns, has had just 7 deaths. How? Through a genuinely world-beating test, trade, isolate and support programme.
This is the key: you make sure test, trace, isolate and support is rock solid. No weak links, everyone fully engaged, led by experienced local health teams. Instead, it put a bunch of dilettantes in charge and outsourced the tasks to profit-driven corporations.
£22bn has been poured into this pathetic sham of a programme, and it hasn't even touched the sides. The government might as well have stacked up the money and set light to it. And there is *still no plan* for sorting out this humungous, worldclass mess.
Conclusion? The ideology of privatisation and the vast profits being creamed by its chums are more important to the government than suppressing the virus and ending our national nightmare. This catastrophe is driven by a lethal combination of ideology, corruption and incompetence
Judging by responses to this thread, some people still seem to believe there's a pay-off between our death rate and getting economic and social life "back to normal". So, where's the pay-off? What have we gained from these world-beating failures to contain the virus?
We're in a third lockdown BECAUSE the government failed, repeatedly, to take decisive and timely action to suppress the pandemic. Neither public health nor social life nor economic life are served by this serial incompetence. Why is this hard to understand?
Oh yes, I forgot.
* Card by @LuiseValentiner

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

13 Jan
This is the mind-blistering fact that everyone should be aware of. The government still has *no plan* for ending the pandemic. Or even for ending the lockdown. I knew we had a troupe of clowns in charge, but this is beyond incompetence.
My column.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Taiwan's most recent death from covid-19 was on May 11th last year. It stopped the virus without lockdowns. How? Mostly through its genuinely world-beating test-trace-isolate-and-support system, developed with the help of participatory democracy. Compare, contrast and weep. Image
See those numbers on the y axis? They are the actual numbers. SEVEN deaths in total from covid-19, in a nation with over twice our population density. This is what competent government looks like.
Read 9 tweets
12 Jan
At every turn the government has undermined public trust and unity, by creating the impression that rules are for little people, while the elite can do what it wants. theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
Compare and contrast. ImageImage
Oh, and by the way, we're still waiting for @MattHancock to speak out against Dominic Cummings's trip.
He condemns ordinary people driving 5 miles.
But not Cummings driving 264 miles.
Read 5 tweets
11 Jan
Heaven forbid that "scrub" (ie regenerating woodland) should be allowed to return to our treasured wet deserts. And thank goodness the BBC is on hand to warn us about this terrible threat.
It's quite right, though. Without repeated grazing by sheep, the denuded, eroded landscape you can see in this photo would revert to natural vegetation, which in the Lakes is temperate rainforest. Perhaps @BBCCountryfile could explain why that's a bad thing?
Allowing the land to rewild would create habitats for a wide range of species and draw down carbon. Recovery starts with bracken and "scrub", then continues through ecological succession towards rainforest.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
The militias who led the attack on the Capitol were to a large extent built and emboldened by anti-environmental campaigns, largely on behalf of ranchers.
This is important, and shouldn't be forgotten.
theguardian.com/environment/20…
Given the coalition of interests that has been gathering around this issue, it's unsurprising that climate science denial has shifted wholesale into denying the impacts of cattle rearing. Those who try to defend the science are fiercely attacked and sometimes threatened.
Cattle ranching, including the most damaging forms, has been rebranded as "regenerative farming", and entirely misleading claims are made about its greenhouse gas impacts. Those who practice genuine regenerative farming should resist this trend. Their currency is being devalued.
Read 4 tweets
7 Jan
I think we have to face a very grim and uncomfortable fact. A lot of people could be permanently affected by Covid-19, in terms or both physical and mental health. Given the huge numbers infected, lifelong impacts could affect a substantial part of the population.
I haven't seen much thinking yet about the implications: the massive amount of support that will be needed, and the horrendous loss of wellbeing. Nor have I seen this threat penetrating the consciousness of those who argue for minimal action to stop the spread of the disease.
It's classic short-termism: to avoid a short period of pain (lockdowns and other restrictions), we will condemn people to a lifetime of suffering.
Read 5 tweets
7 Jan
For Trump and his backers, destruction is no longer a by-product of ideology. It is the ideology. theguardian.com/environment/20…
This is the denouement of the American Nightmare. The belief that God gave European colonists dominion over the “savage lands” and “savage peoples” of the Americas was translated into a holy duty to subdue and tame them. This meant genocide and ecocide.
The colonisation of the Americas was a series of Crusades against the living world and the “heathens” it supported. Destruction and mass killing was not just a convenience – clearing the land for timber, farming, mining etc – but a sacrament. The mindset continues to this day.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!