At every turn the government has undermined public trust and unity, by creating the impression that rules are for little people, while the elite can do what it wants. theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
Compare and contrast.
Oh, and by the way, we're still waiting for @MattHancock to speak out against Dominic Cummings's trip.
He condemns ordinary people driving 5 miles.
But not Cummings driving 264 miles.
George Orwell said that "The lady in the Rolls-Royce car is more damaging to morale than a fleet of Goering's bombing planes." In other words, if the elite excuses itself from the national effort, this effort is dangerously undermined.
Hancock refused to criticise Cummings's disgraceful breach, while immediately jumping on minor infractions by ordinary citizens. You might or might not agree with the rule. That's not the point. The point is that if it applies to us it must apply to them. independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
And let's not be naive about this. If 10 Downing Street is refusing to say whether or not Boris Johnson was driven to the park to ride his bike, it means he was driven to the park to ride his bike. Otherwise they would have firmly refuted it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is the mind-blistering fact that everyone should be aware of. The government still has *no plan* for ending the pandemic. Or even for ending the lockdown. I knew we had a troupe of clowns in charge, but this is beyond incompetence.
My column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Taiwan's most recent death from covid-19 was on May 11th last year. It stopped the virus without lockdowns. How? Mostly through its genuinely world-beating test-trace-isolate-and-support system, developed with the help of participatory democracy. Compare, contrast and weep.
See those numbers on the y axis? They are the actual numbers. SEVEN deaths in total from covid-19, in a nation with over twice our population density. This is what competent government looks like.
Heaven forbid that "scrub" (ie regenerating woodland) should be allowed to return to our treasured wet deserts. And thank goodness the BBC is on hand to warn us about this terrible threat.
It's quite right, though. Without repeated grazing by sheep, the denuded, eroded landscape you can see in this photo would revert to natural vegetation, which in the Lakes is temperate rainforest. Perhaps @BBCCountryfile could explain why that's a bad thing?
Allowing the land to rewild would create habitats for a wide range of species and draw down carbon. Recovery starts with bracken and "scrub", then continues through ecological succession towards rainforest.
Over the most recent recorded 7 day period, the UK has suffered the world's second highest rate of Covid-19 deaths/million. Considerably worse even than the US. statista.com/statistics/110…
Why is our death rate so high? Because we have an incompetent, irresponsible government, without a clear strategy, constantly surprised by events, that put more effort into enriching its chums than into crushing the disease.
It handed crucial tasks to profiteers and appointed unqualified people to highly sensitive roles (eg head of test and trace). Even to this day - and this is the crucial fact - it has *no plan* for ending the pandemic. Just a string of reactive, disconnected policies.
The militias who led the attack on the Capitol were to a large extent built and emboldened by anti-environmental campaigns, largely on behalf of ranchers.
This is important, and shouldn't be forgotten. theguardian.com/environment/20…
Given the coalition of interests that has been gathering around this issue, it's unsurprising that climate science denial has shifted wholesale into denying the impacts of cattle rearing. Those who try to defend the science are fiercely attacked and sometimes threatened.
Cattle ranching, including the most damaging forms, has been rebranded as "regenerative farming", and entirely misleading claims are made about its greenhouse gas impacts. Those who practice genuine regenerative farming should resist this trend. Their currency is being devalued.
I think we have to face a very grim and uncomfortable fact. A lot of people could be permanently affected by Covid-19, in terms or both physical and mental health. Given the huge numbers infected, lifelong impacts could affect a substantial part of the population.
I haven't seen much thinking yet about the implications: the massive amount of support that will be needed, and the horrendous loss of wellbeing. Nor have I seen this threat penetrating the consciousness of those who argue for minimal action to stop the spread of the disease.
It's classic short-termism: to avoid a short period of pain (lockdowns and other restrictions), we will condemn people to a lifetime of suffering.
For Trump and his backers, destruction is no longer a by-product of ideology. It is the ideology. theguardian.com/environment/20…
This is the denouement of the American Nightmare. The belief that God gave European colonists dominion over the “savage lands” and “savage peoples” of the Americas was translated into a holy duty to subdue and tame them. This meant genocide and ecocide.
The colonisation of the Americas was a series of Crusades against the living world and the “heathens” it supported. Destruction and mass killing was not just a convenience – clearing the land for timber, farming, mining etc – but a sacrament. The mindset continues to this day.