Stepping back, reminded of universality of rising consumer expectations
Once people had world class consumer apps better ent apps was inevitable
So too will it be for govt services. The frustration is painful but also great sign
It's easy to bash the digital experiences of govt services. Often rightly so
But sobering to realize that much of user improvement of ent products has only been in last *decade*
Progress get most pulled when consumers flip from default satisfied to upset at lack of improvement
Consumer products have pushed forward user expectations, and they carry that over in all areas
You can call that the hedonic treadmill, the red queen effect, the divine discontent of customers, consumer inflation, or anything else
But it's a big part of what pressures progress
And it's been remarkable to see enterprise products today and how much they have improved in focus on user experience
This isn't solely due to user expectations ofc. Many other factors like who is paying, product driven acq, and more
But it's only natural we should see ent lag
consumer. And govt lag enterprise even more. (why is a whole essay or book that could be written. And the stack ranking of fields by this is an entire investment thesis)
None of this is to say that we should let govt off the hook. The opposite is true. Pressure must continue to
be felt by govts to deliver better value to their constituents. There's no tech company whose product quality matters more than our govt's. Whether you're a republican or democrat
The government's efficacy in improving lives of its citizens is bipartisan
If you're a small govt republican, we can only have a small govt if that govt is best able to do the important things ONLY it can do as well as possible due to tech leverage and good digital experiences
If you're a big govt democrat, there is no better way to convince people we should be increasing govt programs than by them being seen to be high efficacy and great at improving people's lives
Anyways, much more could be written on this
But I've found important for me to remember
- we need to expect better from the govt on these modern services
- Public frustration and increased expectations is the first step to progress
- The work we take for granted in tech will tak
e time to get adopted well in govt
- there are many people both in govt and tech that are doing a lot to improve it
- there are many more that will be required to deliver these outcomes best at the scale of the United States
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was skeptical on signal risk being big issue. Its impact on potential new vcs is still overweighted imo
But recent convos with founder friends has flipped my view
The real issue is how it changes openness on fundraising strategy between founders & *current* investor
Because now they are player in the next round too. So founders become a lot more sensitive about what to share and being able to talk it through with them
Not only bc have to still be marketing to them (which I personally think people underweight degree you always must do that)
but also because now conversations with them affect the dynamics of upcoming round, like double slit experiment
I don't view that as insurmountable. And all of private markets is the essence of conflict of interest (which has huge positives too)
Years ago was randomly trying to find video of In the Heights. Stumbled on yahoo groups where these cams were traded
They had manual seeding/leeching setup. Realized it was high schoolers w/ broadway dreams, but very limited access to actual shows (not living in nyc / cost)
Love finding these niche communities on the internet. And to the lovely person who took pity on me and sent me the video of In the Heights. She added me on social later and has been great to watch her pursue her acting dreams
Broadway historically has been very hard to access
Most people aren’t able to go see shows. It’s wild to see how many are obsessed with something so few have access too.
LMM has made point that for many the scripts shows let high schools use to put on performances is biggest onbording point for most students. And LMM for both
Thermodynamics and systems clearly is very promising vein to draw on in studying loops--so great to see Danco dive into the Carnot cycle and transfer learn principles of loops
One of the odd questions is why thermodynamics and systems analysis were never really merged in with the groups studying these kinds of loops in business context over last half century
Reminds me of Origin of Wealth's theory that econ was a fork of laws of thermodynamics half
way through. With all the attendant issues.
But my personal theory is slightly different. I think that the mechanisms by which loops operate and even some atomic components transfer well. But there are key differences that made people not merge them together. But that normalized