If only SC had constituted such a committee to verify Dr MVS' contention on behalf of Telangana Archaka Samakhya that draconian AP 30/87 Act was unconstitutional and would deprive right to life of Archaka community and then decided constitutionality of Act
The Govt appointed committee report annexure details orders of SC in 1997 after SC appointed committee submitted its report. It could have stayed the operation of Act for low income temples till AP Govt made suitable amendments to draconian Act even though it acknowledged mistake
Even after about 25 years after the above order the AP Govt is yet to implement the 1997 order of SC. If the SC waited for committee report before declaring Act constitutional or atleast stay its operation for low income temples when reality was before it lot of distress avoided.
It is a sad commentary on way SC functions that instead of solving problems created by it due to declaring draconian AP 30/87 Act constitutional without verifying contentions even as late as 2013 when reality was presented it asked Archaka community to seek "appropriate remedy" ?
The below book has been written mainly for the SC to reflect on how it let the Archaka community down by taking away their fundamental rights under Constitution it was supposed to defend leaving them to fend for themselves as they till today are seeking "appropriate remedy" !!!!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Rangarajan chilkur

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @csranga

11 Jan
If only SC had constituted a committee to verify the claim of Dr MVS on behalf of Telangana Archaka Samakhya that draconian AP 30/87 Act would cause great distress.

SC upheld constitutionality first and then appointed committee to verify the claims.

Archaka community suffered
"The fact that many Archaka families became
impoverished and temples virtually closed down is clear from the following excerpt from the
Statement of Objects and Reasons of Act 33 of 2007 "

AP Govt appointed committee in 2011 described why Archaka community became impoverished
"Since this community is not significant enough to impact the voting patterns its problems are not a priority for the Government machinery.." Shri @IYRKRao garu to SC

It is not just Executive & Legislature..Archaka community problems are not a priority for the Judiciary also.
Read 4 tweets
11 Jan
The cause for protest of crores of Lord Ayyappa devotees #Ayyappajyothi is taking away of constitutional rights of Hindu Deities by SC.
The reason for above situation is we use different yardstick for rights of Prince of Arcot vs rights of Hindu Deities
Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement is a fight by a Hindu Deity on behalf of all Deities against above discrimination where agreement between Prince of Arcot and British is valued more than agreement made with Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity
Request devotees not to be silent spectator to this discrimination by the Secular State and be #Vocal4Dharma and reach out devout MPs to support Art 363 Constitutional Morality (Dharma) Chilkur Balaji Art 26 Hindu Deity rights dispute before His Excellency
Read 6 tweets
10 Jan
Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity has fulfilled wishes of many devotees let us work to fulfill His wish of reclaiming Art 26 Deity rights by securing devout MP support for Art 363 Constitutional Morality (Dharma) Chilkur Balaji Art 26 Deity Rights dispute👇format
Let us work to fulfill the pious purpose of historic #AyyappaJyothi which was lit in Chilkur Balaji Temple along with crores of devotees of Lord Ayyappa in Kerala for reclaiming Art 26 Deity Rights
Let us work for victory of Dharma यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः the victory of Lord Ayyappa devotees to ensure the well-being of our Nation

Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
Art 363 Constitutional Morality(Dharma) Chilkur Balaji Art 26 Deity Rights Dispute pending w His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn is to reclaim the spirit of Art 26 protection of Hindu Dharmika Sampradaya for which Kanchi Paramacharya had taken great initiative
Received below photo of Kanchi Paramacharya from Shishya inspired by the fact that we are working to reclaim Art 26 rights of Hindu Dharmika Sampradaya in Hindu Deity legal personality that was inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya but currently lost by our Sampradaya due to Judiciary Image
There are many Hon'ble MPs who are Shishyas of Kanchi Paramacharya hope they support the initiative reclaim Art 26 fundamental right of Hindu Dharmika Sampradaya protected in Hindu Deity legal personality that he inserted through letter to His Excellency
Read 5 tweets
24 Dec 20
We The People of this great Nation Bharath have given constitutional power to SC to protect Dharma(यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem) at same time whenever SC does not do this we have retained constitutional right to rectify thru His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn
The Constitutional Morality (Dharma) spirit embedded in Art 363 is that SC in its adjudicating role cannot interpret our constitution in a way which would negate our pledged word to Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity very embodiment of Dharma which we value more than life
As a Nation which from very ancient times believes in the spirit of Dharma that one should value pledged word more than life we request His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn decide Art 363 Constitutional Morality (Dharma) dispute applying the same spirit & guide Council of Ministers
Read 5 tweets
22 Dec 20
We believe there is no difference between the fight for Dharma of Lord Shri Rama Deity and Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity and It is our duty to fulfill the pious purpose for which our Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity approached SC Nine Judge Bench but was not heard

Our Judiciary has to introspect on the fact that frm Feb 10th after rejection of Deity petition there has been only a single sitting of less than an hour by the Supreme Court Nine Judge Bench till date" AP Founder Association on rejection of Deity petition
We are thankful that there are many dharmik organizations which share our view that the pious purpose of Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity movement to protect Art 26 Deity rights of all Hindu Deities is also very important and should be supported 🙏
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!