Zilliqa governance proposal attempts to strike a balance between permissionlessness and spam mitigation.
1/ Allows one to start a conversation on a change that one firmly believes in by describing the idea as a ZIP and getting the initial buy-in from the community on the forum.
1/ Allows one to start a conversation on a change that one firmly believes in by describing the idea as a ZIP and getting the initial buy-in from the community on the forum.
2/ However, it mitigates spams by requiring enough buy-in from the community in the form of informal "FOR" votes on the forum. At least 25% of votes must be "FOR", thereby signalling sufficient interest to take it to the next step. No $gZIL requirement also helps at this stage.
3/ At the next step of formal voting on the governance portal via Snapshot, it is required that the proposer must have at least 30 $gZIL to put the proposal to vote to prevent spam. But, in case the OP doesn't have enough $gZIL, anyone could do so on the OP's behalf.
4/ During the voting period, anyone with $gZIL can vote. But, the voting is valid only if enough people have voted for or against the proposal. The total number of FOR and AGAINST votes must be 20% of the total $gZIL supply captured in the snapshot.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
