A Tale of 2 Articles: A Chasm Creating Two Continents
@drmoore & Carl Trueman put out articles this week addressing what seems to be their take on the major problem with evangelicals & race. The online engagement & responses show how polarizing this issue continues to be. 1/7
While @drmoore is an SBC entity head, his personal lament, indictment, and challenge got little public engagement from his co-entity heads. (I don't think a single one liked, reposted, or retweeted).
That may mean nothing. Maybe people are fatigued. Tired of the constant (2/7)
engagement surrounding the topic of evangelicals & racial strife.
However, Carl's article on Evangelicals & Race THEORY got much different engagement. It seemed like some of the very people @drmoore was addressing with his use of first person plural pronouns (we, us, our,) (3/7
Resonated more with Trueman's take on the problem than his. Now this isn't EVERYTHING. But it's not NOTHING.
From where I'm sitting this is a chasm that's too large to be bridged by general calls for Christian unity, brotherhood, and cooperation.
In other words.. (4/7)
I don't think we'll see closure by "going back to the way things were" as much as we'll see a new normal.
This chasm doesn't seem like one that'll close, but one that continues to grow until it eventually turns this one evangelical country into two separate continents. (5/7)
"A problem well-defined, is a problem half-solved" - John Dewey.
Agreeing on the nature of a problem, is a greater determiner the level of unity we'll have in solving a problem than we might imagine.
Right now, that chasm feels more like the Pacific that state lines. (6/7)
P.S. This is a twitter thread, not a treatise. I'm processing as I type so don't read too much into things that may be confusing. Ask a clarifying question before you put me on the chopping block.
P. P. S. I won't respond if your actual name and face aren't in your Twitter bio.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I read it all and walked away with an uncanny sense of freedom, relief, and energy to continue doing the work of addressing racial inequality and injustice.
Carl neither represents my position nor properly diagnoses the source of my discontent with the current struggle over racial injustice or the disharmony we're currently experiencing.
I'm sure he describes some real person in this article, but THAT real person is not THIS person (me) nor people like me. I hear about those seduced by CRT, & I know they exist, I know some of them, but I don't know MANY of them.
If you want to see the full fury of a man, demean his wife. Go ahead, try it. Be provocative in your critiques about her. Be careless with your complaints. Use overgeneralizations when describing her flaws. Overlook her kindness...place a magnifying glass on her flaws.
A seemingly quiet & docile man will explode with rage when his bride is repeatedly demeaned, disparaged & disrespected.
Sit with this. Out of ALL the metaphors that could have been used to describe the church—God labels it His bride!
Christian, be careful with your “critiques” or “challenges” (or whatever semantics you might argue) when discussing “the church”.
What I’m NOT saying, is “don’t ever critique the church”—the church needs to cared for and part of caring is critiquing.