It’s not “courageous” to suddenly condemn Trump for political reasons when you have been embracing him for political reasons over the past four years.
I have a lot more respect for the people who have been either against him or for him since day one than for the people who have changed their opinion for political expediency.
I just think a lot of the people who are condemning him now would still be embracing him if he was about to enter a second term. That’s why politicians are so distrusted.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Lisa Boothe

Lisa Boothe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LisaMarieBoothe

29 Oct 20
There is no case for Joe Biden. 1) INEFFECTIVE. He’s had 47 years to deliver on the promises he’s making now. If he couldn’t get it done then, don’t count on it now. 2) LIAR. He was forced out of the 1988 race due to plagiarism and has doubled down on lying ever since. (1/6)
He launched his candidacy on the very fine people lie, which Trump never said yet the media maliciously repeats. Biden lied about his knowledge of his son’s overseas business dealings. 3) CORRUPTION. His entire family is corrupt and have leveraged their last name. (2/6)
4) OUT OF TOUCH. He might have been good ol’ Joe from Scranton in 1942, but he’s been in Washington for 47 years. His policy decisions like increased regulations have hurt working class families. 5) WRONG. Biden has been consistently wrong on foreign policy. (3/6)
Read 6 tweets
25 Jun 20
Why is it so hard for people to understand that you can unequivocally believe that black lives matter without supporting a radical organization that has roots in Marxism and the DCCC called radical in 2015?
One of the group’s co-founders said they are trained Marxists:…
Another leader made threats last night:…
Read 4 tweets
17 Apr 20
BREAKING: Coronavirus random sampling study from Stanford. They found the infection is 50-85 x more common than previously thought & fatality rate accordingly 50-85 x lower than the crude numbers would suggest.
The sample was conducted in Santa Clara County. It is great news because it shows that more people are infected than previously thought, which also means that the true mortality rate is much lower.
This study is the first large-scale community-based prevalence study of its kind. They used serological tests to identify antibodies. “These prevalence estimates represent a range between 48,000 and 81,000 people infected in Santa Clara County by early April.”
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!