The more I read Fomenko by his logic.. anyone that tries to start an empire is the same person.. Idk how the theory makes sense as it's presented in his work.. If anyone can point me in the right direction lmk..
The dude is trying to say Egypt is from the middle ages and that Akhenaten, Charles V, and Constantine are all the same person..
It's like he takes any pattern that might be similar in all of history and says it's connected.. but it's simply a language barrier that separates them not eras of time..
I'm not going to completely say the Tartaria stuff is bullshit as Fomenko presents it yet.. but I'm really leaning in that direction..
I will admit.. I can be wrong about this as he's presenting some interesting information I'm not completely fluent in wrt the early Habsburg history and Ottoman history.. but I'm not sure his connections are accurate..
Is there anyone that's been able to make sense of all of Fomenkos work aside from Fomenko?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Through much of history we have seen multiple examples of a lost seafaring civilizations. Is there anything to these legends? We will examine some of the ideas here.
Perhaps the most famous of the legends is that of Atlantis.
Plato told the story of Atlantis around 360 B.C.
They created a utopian civilization and became a great naval power. Their home was made up of concentric islands separated by wide moats and linked by a canals.
The way they are zooming in on my Jew Man Bad argument is suspect as fuck.. I've explained and linked to you multiple times what I mean by it.. I will one more time for clarification for the readers..
This is really what we are looking at..he rightly calls out the Scaligerian shifting timeline, but then applies that model to all of the rest of history assuming we can base everything on written accounts alone. Ignoring archeological finds, linguistics, and architecture changes.
In Fomenko's model we are to assume that Egypt and Byzantium existed at the same time but that the architecture and customs are to be chopped up to simply a different spoken visual languages.
He suggests that Osiris and Christ are the same person. Which is fine if you are speaking at a meta level like Jospeh Campbell does.
But Fomenko is literally suggesting that they all are the same person just different "reflections" grammatically speaking.
I was taking with someone today about activating levels of your DNA with sound tones like binaural beats or singing bowls... and now I’m wondering if there’s something to this related to the sounds you’d hear in a rainforest..
Many people listen to sounds for relaxation.. I wonder if jungle sounds truly promote relaxation on a genetic memory level.. kinda like how if you hold a puppy over water it will kick its legs instinctively knowing how to swim / stay afloat..
I wonder if there is something about the sounds that triggers modern humans into a more relaxed state by hearing the sounds because of some genetic encoding that would then be “activated” 🤔