1. The Trump Card is being played.
Election Fraud would be a serious felony under normal circumstances, but under an active state of war it would be considered an act of treason. Think back Re: Kavanaugh conf. hearings.
2. What are the requirements for a civilian to be tried for treason?
We have been in a state of war since 2001. Pelosi and all other members of Congress are NO LONGER members of Congress, they’ve forfeited their rights and offices by committing an act of TREASON.
3. They are no longer members of lawful Congress, thanks to section 3 of 14th Amendment. They are now considered enemies of the Republic who have aided a foreign power in stealing an election. When you have committed an act of treason, you have forfeit your rights as an American.
4. You have no rights. Military law vs civilian law?
Any evidence is admissible in a military tribunal court, so Pelosi’s stolen laptop can be used in her military tribunal along with everything else the she has done, to lock her and the others away for good.
5. History will show that DJT tried every legal avenue to solve this crisis against our Constitution. It will show that all others failed to address this act of Treason. He tried to resolve this peacefully. Jan 7 congress received DNI report on Foreign Influence in US elections.
6. President Trump’s only recourse left was to use military by signing Insurrection Act, but it will be a LAWFUL use of military as these people have broken their oaths and have committed TREASON and INSURRECTION.
7. President Donald J Trump is LEGALLY REQUIRED to act on this because of his own oath to the Constitution, to protect our Republic from enemies Foreign and DOMESTIC. The crimes of their indictments will read; TREASON, SEDITION, and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.
8. When the whole world finds out they launched a virus to steal an election, flamed a race war to steal funds, and shutdown small businesses to DESTROY economy...
The Great Awakening will begin. They’ve sealed their fates.
Storm has Arrived.
9. Trumps impeachment will not stand under the light of these circumstances. It does bring us to a gloating bunch, happily coming to inauguration. As the world watches.
Thanks to Tammy Stevens who helped answer my questions constitution.
10. Someone posted an alternative ending to me earlier but I don’t agree with some things.
Trump himself said he did sign something that comes into effect Jan 1, 2021. I believe it was signed July 3 in Mt Rushmore. Is this it?
11. I love the narrative here. For those that know about Act of 1871 and the USA Inc. I have alway thought this was signed on July 3 at Mt Rushmore as indicated at the end on my Reset: The Level Playing Field.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So this is why an investigation is happening after biographical pages for the president and vice president were changed on Monday. If true, this would removed both Trump and Pence. Nancy is missing. Where is Chuck?
1 How Trump took over Fed? A back door was installed in the Fed back in 1934, so the elites could easily and secretly steal money from it. What is the back door? It is the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF). The fund, which would come under the control of Treasury Secretary
2 The ESF, came under the control of Treasury Secretary in today's Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act signing and is designed to aid distressed industries. politico.com/news/2020/03/2…
3 Donald Trump just signed the CARES Act. Title IV of the law is called the Economic Stabilization & Assistance to Severely Distressed Sectors of the United States Economy. swfinstitute.org/news/78480/by-…
1) U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments signed an updated United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”) in Mexico City. The Digital Trade Agreement is the foundation for all the US trade deals, Japan and China. Deals soon to come from India, UK, Russia, and others.
2) The FINANCIAL SERVICES chapter which is chapter 17 BTW!
Chapter Q? Can't make this up.
This will be groundbreaking for trade including cross border payments and financial services. No names used but "require a Party to permit a cross-border financial service supplier" 17.5
3) Article 17.7 New Financial Services
"Each Party shall permit a financial institution of another Party to supply a new financial service that the Party would permit its own financial institutions, in like circumstances, to supply without adopting a law or modifying..."