Here's the thing.
Big rallies draw lots of kinds of people.
Mostly peaceful, but passionate voices.
They also bring out crazies.
The more passionate the rally the more likely the crazies will falsely believe they are empowered to act out the chants and slogans all around them.
The Capitol Riot had a contingency of well-known instigators, fantasy revolutionaries and very real actually dangerous people deluded into believing they were there to save the country, oh, and lots of white supremacists and Nazi LARPers and so on.
We shouldn't shut down all political activism and rallying.
But we must have better security and better organized rallies.
We have to be aware of the people who show up and pay attention to rising passions.
Our leaders must balance passion with measured reason.
It doesn't matter what the left does.
We have to better handle this. Otherwise any time any group of conservatives or libertarians or Republicans will be labeled a potential terrorist event.
Our government has the power to target and intervene on terrorism plotting.
It should be obvious by now that the media will eagerly exploit any rally this way.
It doesn't matter if 99 out of 100 people are standing with their hands up as Rick Santorum reads the Federalist Papers out loud. 1 guy yeehawing around with a gun will bring the National Guard.
We can't live in fear.
But we just have to be smarter.
Strategic.
Overly cautious.
And we have to stop the stubborn notion we are going to be reliving 1776 against an oppressive Democratic government.
Be reasonable.
That's all we have.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here is my argument for why access to digital services should be considered a civil right equal to access to physical services.
As a Jewish person and as a gay person I am protected under anti-discrimination law (varied for being gay).
A store cannot ban me for either.
A store could not, for example, have a policy that bans 'immoral behavior' on their property and then selectively enforce this only on gay couples who happen to either simply walk in or who hold hands or show affection of any kind.
No liberal perspective would agree.
If this happened to me I would be able to argue that my civil rights had been violated.
Even without official legal protections, this would be enough to file a lawsuit, launch legislation and create public outcry until it was officially illegal to do so.
The left believes bad ideas reproduce in the open.
You let someone share a bad idea and it multiplies with the validation of an official platform.
That makes it 'dangerous' as exposure is like a virus.
They think if you suppress the people with the bad idea, it will suffocate.
It seems simple to them.
Trump incited his followers to commit violence through his rhetoric, ban Trump and you remove the rhetoric.
No one else gets infected.
But then you must remove all those already infected...
Then you must stop the rhetoric from repeating.
Its a simple issue of threat reduction, not speech suppression.
But they refuse to recognize that in doing so they validate the rhetoric, turn it into dogma and it becomes mythology with more and more loyal adherents.
It goes underground.
It grows in power and legitimacy.
If you are not a journalist or writer or if you are not trying to build a public profile right now, please:
- Use a generic AVI and take out your name and location from your profile.
- Turn your privacy settings on facebook off for searches and only let your friends see you.
Your facebook doesn't need to have your employer on it or your town or your phone number. Your friends and family already know who you are.
Same for any other social media you use.
If you use LinkedIn set your profile to private so only your connections can see you.
Basically you do not want to be easily found with a google search of your name.
Its easier than you think and its best to lock down. You don't need an open profile.
The only exception is if you are job hunting. Again, disguise your twitter and its less of an issue.