THREAD: On a strategy to skim articles (for undergraduates).

Several fellow professors (@drheather_smith @EJMcCann among others) have told me that they find my Reading Strategies resource page slightly advanced for undergraduates. This might be the case (and may apply to ESL)
Here is my Reading Strategies page raulpacheco.org/resources/read…

The above said, I DO have a page with Reading Strategies that is specific for Undergraduate Students (see here - raulpacheco.org/resources/reso…)
When I teach how to read (whether it is to my own undergrad and grad students, or to my research assistants), I always recommend (undergrad or grad) doing a quick skim, THEN a second round.

I call this quick overview AIC (Abstract, Intro, Conclusion) raulpacheco.org/2017/01/findin…
Dr. Smith asked me recently whether I had a template for undergraduates where they could combine my AIC strategy with maybe the Rhetorical Precis raulpacheco.org/2016/10/using-…

It occurred to me that we need to provide a template with questions pointing to what to look for in a paper.
There's another element that needs to be discussed that I've been mulling for months now.

We need different strategies to read, annotate, take notes, and synthesize different materials.

We assign very different types of reading materials (books, articles and book chapters).
The article I read this morning is an empirical article. It looks at one particular case study of a social movement (fighting HIV/AIDS in Brazil)

Empirical articles usually have abstracts that have a 5-7 sentences structure as I describe in my blog. raulpacheco.org/2018/07/how-to…

Any template that seeks to help students how to decompose what they are looking for in a paper needs to focus on helping find those 5 - 7 elements.
I'm not the only one who has ever wondered how to help undergrads read. I point to several resources here

1) Dr. Amelia @HooverGreen has developed a nifty guide for how to read in political science ameliahoovergreen.com/uploads/9/3/0/…

2) Dr. @Victor_Asal uses this
Now, the way I see this template working is: I need a structure that helps undergraduate (and graduate) students DECOMPOSE the structure of what they read (Abstract, Intro, Conclusion) in a way that helps them absorb the material quickly.

Here's the "Abstract" section.
This is my first stab at Dr. Rich’s LARR article’s abstract. She uses a somewhat refined version of the 5-7 sentences model for her abstract, but I (and my students) can draw all elements anyway.
You can see how I went through the Abstract and responded all 5 questions drawing from Rich’s article. To avoid plagiarism I add a column with Direct Quotations (and, like anybody else, I also wrongly wrote some stuff that wasn’t a direct quote in the wrong column LOL)
As I went through my template and Rich's abstract, I realized that there are elements in the abstract that give the reader much more information about the context of the research, why she studied those social movements, etc.

This has two implications that I want to draw here:
1) As @HooverGreen indicates in her guide, we need to teach students to look at "signpost" - words that give them a clue about what they are reading.

In the sentence: "I show how X phenomenon occurs", the phrase "I show" does the work of signposting what the author is doing.
2) As Dr. @JessicaCalarco does this post jessicacalarco.com/tips-tricks/20… we need to read looking for meaning (and as faculty, we need to teach how to read looking for that meaning, for those signposts).

Because there is no unified writing approach, and we all write differently...
... we STILL need to teach HOW TO READ (and how to absorb what we read and make sense of it). From the Abstract, I can make sense of a lot about Rich's article: it's on hybrid social movements, looks at Brazil's AIDS movements and develops a third way of looking at SM: federated.
HOWEVER... so far, from reading Rich's abstract I know nothing about her methods, approach to how she conducted this study of federative coalitions, etc. THIS is precisely the reason why I always tell my students to do a quick AIC skim: there are details that escape the abstract.
That's why now we need to move on to reading this article's Introduction.

Here is a quick template/framework for the kinds of questions that we should ask ourselves when reading introductions (based off my blog post on how to write introductions raulpacheco.org/2018/02/how-to…)
This is a quick template/framework with some questions that we (or our students) should ask ourselves when reading Conclusions.

My post on how to write the conclusion for a research paper might help too. raulpacheco.org/2018/08/how-to…
Once we put everything together, it becomes clear that running a quick AIC skim involves asking several questions for each component (Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion). With practice (I read at least one article per day), this process becomes much faster raulpacheco.org/2017/12/carvin…
I believe this image should be easier to read.
I created a full template for creating a Synthetic Note based on an AIC quick skim. Includes:

1) Guidance on readings that students should do beforehand so they understand what AIC is all about.
2) A series of questions for each one of the components of AIC
3) A template.
The template includes suggested wording that can be adjusted.
4) An example of what I got after applying my guiding questions to a real life example (an empirical paper).

dropbox.com/s/icxbrtv7xg75…

An example of how I used the guiding questions for each one element (AIC) is...
... still in the works. I created the Synthetic Note after running my reading through each element but that is not fully reflected (that is, there is an intermediate step where I should show each one of the tables with my own notes).

Hope this is helpful!
Here's the template and an application with the paper I was highlighting and annotating.

And a sampler of how I filled out the tables to help me draw the most relevant information out of all three components of AIC (Abstract is the only one shown in this screen capture).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega

Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @raulpacheco

16 Jan
THREAD: on reading methods papers.

In a previous thread I indicated that in the same way that we need a repertoire of reading strategies, we also need to recognize the different types of articles, book chapters and books we read.

In this thread I’ll showcase several types.
1) this piece about shadowing of political elites is one of my favourites - it’s in @polanalysis (a rather quantitative journal), focuses on a qualitative method (shadowing) and is by one of my favourite political scientists (@jenniferbussell)

I started with the Abstract. Image
Reading the first page took me just a few minutes and I can gain a lot of insight already.

I marked sentences that I’d like to quote directly (definition of shadowing, how it works). These direct quotations can go in a Cornell Note, CSED row or Everything Notebook or index card Image
Read 10 tweets
15 Jan
THREAD: Teaching students how to differentiate among various types of reading materials is important, not only for students but also for those of us who are educators.

When we design syllabi (see my Resources for Educators) raulpacheco.org/resources/reso… we include different materials
For example, these papers are specific to “methods”: they describe a method (or a type of innovation to make a method work)

I always tell my students to avoid doing an AIC with methods papers. Instead do a meso-level or medium-level read: look for major themes, ideas, concepts. ImageImage
These are “empirical” papers: authors apply or develop a new method which then is implemented in a case study, comparative examination or dataset.

Empirical papers, in my view, can be first quickly read using AIC and LATER, do a second round of in-depth reading. ImageImageImage
Read 7 tweets
11 Jan
Random planning and organizing thought for the day/week.

Many of you have returned to teaching today (or to class).

For many of us, the realities of online teaching and learning, care work, etc., again are settling in.

I suggest that we Plan for Survival with Cherry on Top
You survived - RIGHT FUCKING ON.

Your family survived - GLORY!

Your friends, students, colleagues are doing as well as they can be? -EXCELLENT

Anything else is the Cherry on Top.

Did you #WriteFor10Minutes - CHERRY ON TOP

Did you #AIC one article? - CHERRY ON TOP.
Did you teach that one first class of the semester? - CHERRY ON TOP

Did you manage to have the readings ready for the first couple weeks of classes? - CHERRY ON TOP.

Did you manage to answer 5 emails? - CHERRY ON TOP.

Right now, the goal is to survive this pandemic.
Read 6 tweets
10 Jan
DISCLOSURE: I paid for this book stand with my hard earned and very devalued Mexican pesos. I bought it for $499 Mexican pesos (circa $23 USD) at Costco but I looked for it this weekend and I couldn’t find them anymore (I should have bought 3. Two for my home offices, one FLACSO.
A couple of features will be intuitive like this flexible adjustment contraption in the back. This book stand comes without any instructions and there is only one YouTube video and it doesn’t give much explanation.
The feature that was NOT intuitive at all and took me a while to move from locked to unlocked and back was the adjustable base that holds books and papers. That takes a while to tinker with but once you get it, locking and unlocking is easy peasy breeze.
Read 8 tweets
26 Dec 20
THREAD. On writing, note-taking, reading, and synthesizing information. This fall, I taught Research Design at the doctoral level, and a Masters' Research (Thesis) Seminar.

Because of the way I like teaching (research design, research methods and mechanics of research), ....
... I quickly realized that teaching Note-Taking Techniques, Reading Strategies, and Synthesis Methods was complicated. It's kind of a chicken and egg problem. What do students need to learn first, reading or taking notes? Teaching strategies for both is hard to do simultaneously
I tried the following sequence:
- Reading Strategies
- Note-Taking Techniques
- Synthesis Methods
- Writing Tips

Turns out that students are thrust into the "you need to read a lot to understand what I am teaching" model quite early during their programmes. This poses challenges
Read 12 tweets
22 Dec 20
I have been thinking about writing a thread on how to link theory with research, which probably fits with the question that was asked by @PhDForum earlier today - how do we choose a theoretical framework.

I'm going to try to formulate this discussion as clearly as possible.
This discussion about how to link theory with research (and with the method) is one I have had with @salazar_elena and @gcaleman for a while now. How do we link all the theories we read into what we see in the empirical work?

I believe that there are three elements at play.
1) There are various types and levels of theory (grand theory, meso-level theory, micro-level theory), etc.

2) We (scholars, students, practitioners) need to read very broadly to be able to discern across theories.

3) We need to learn how to establish THEORETICAL EXPECTATIONS
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!