THREAD: On a strategy to skim articles (for undergraduates).
Several fellow professors (@drheather_smith@EJMcCann among others) have told me that they find my Reading Strategies resource page slightly advanced for undergraduates. This might be the case (and may apply to ESL)
The above said, I DO have a page with Reading Strategies that is specific for Undergraduate Students (see here - raulpacheco.org/resources/reso…)
When I teach how to read (whether it is to my own undergrad and grad students, or to my research assistants), I always recommend (undergrad or grad) doing a quick skim, THEN a second round.
Dr. Smith asked me recently whether I had a template for undergraduates where they could combine my AIC strategy with maybe the Rhetorical Precis raulpacheco.org/2016/10/using-…
It occurred to me that we need to provide a template with questions pointing to what to look for in a paper.
There's another element that needs to be discussed that I've been mulling for months now.
We need different strategies to read, annotate, take notes, and synthesize different materials.
We assign very different types of reading materials (books, articles and book chapters).
The article I read this morning is an empirical article. It looks at one particular case study of a social movement (fighting HIV/AIDS in Brazil)
Now, the way I see this template working is: I need a structure that helps undergraduate (and graduate) students DECOMPOSE the structure of what they read (Abstract, Intro, Conclusion) in a way that helps them absorb the material quickly.
Here's the "Abstract" section.
This is my first stab at Dr. Rich’s LARR article’s abstract. She uses a somewhat refined version of the 5-7 sentences model for her abstract, but I (and my students) can draw all elements anyway.
You can see how I went through the Abstract and responded all 5 questions drawing from Rich’s article. To avoid plagiarism I add a column with Direct Quotations (and, like anybody else, I also wrongly wrote some stuff that wasn’t a direct quote in the wrong column LOL)
As I went through my template and Rich's abstract, I realized that there are elements in the abstract that give the reader much more information about the context of the research, why she studied those social movements, etc.
This has two implications that I want to draw here:
1) As @HooverGreen indicates in her guide, we need to teach students to look at "signpost" - words that give them a clue about what they are reading.
In the sentence: "I show how X phenomenon occurs", the phrase "I show" does the work of signposting what the author is doing.
2) As Dr. @JessicaCalarco does this post jessicacalarco.com/tips-tricks/20… we need to read looking for meaning (and as faculty, we need to teach how to read looking for that meaning, for those signposts).
Because there is no unified writing approach, and we all write differently...
... we STILL need to teach HOW TO READ (and how to absorb what we read and make sense of it). From the Abstract, I can make sense of a lot about Rich's article: it's on hybrid social movements, looks at Brazil's AIDS movements and develops a third way of looking at SM: federated.
HOWEVER... so far, from reading Rich's abstract I know nothing about her methods, approach to how she conducted this study of federative coalitions, etc. THIS is precisely the reason why I always tell my students to do a quick AIC skim: there are details that escape the abstract.
That's why now we need to move on to reading this article's Introduction.
Here is a quick template/framework for the kinds of questions that we should ask ourselves when reading introductions (based off my blog post on how to write introductions raulpacheco.org/2018/02/how-to…)
This is a quick template/framework with some questions that we (or our students) should ask ourselves when reading Conclusions.
Once we put everything together, it becomes clear that running a quick AIC skim involves asking several questions for each component (Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion). With practice (I read at least one article per day), this process becomes much faster raulpacheco.org/2017/12/carvin…
I believe this image should be easier to read.
I created a full template for creating a Synthetic Note based on an AIC quick skim. Includes:
1) Guidance on readings that students should do beforehand so they understand what AIC is all about. 2) A series of questions for each one of the components of AIC 3) A template.
The template includes suggested wording that can be adjusted. 4) An example of what I got after applying my guiding questions to a real life example (an empirical paper).
An example of how I used the guiding questions for each one element (AIC) is...
... still in the works. I created the Synthetic Note after running my reading through each element but that is not fully reflected (that is, there is an intermediate step where I should show each one of the tables with my own notes).
Hope this is helpful!
Here's the template and an application with the paper I was highlighting and annotating.
And a sampler of how I filled out the tables to help me draw the most relevant information out of all three components of AIC (Abstract is the only one shown in this screen capture).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In a previous thread I indicated that in the same way that we need a repertoire of reading strategies, we also need to recognize the different types of articles, book chapters and books we read.
In this thread I’ll showcase several types.
1) this piece about shadowing of political elites is one of my favourites - it’s in @polanalysis (a rather quantitative journal), focuses on a qualitative method (shadowing) and is by one of my favourite political scientists (@jenniferbussell)
I started with the Abstract.
Reading the first page took me just a few minutes and I can gain a lot of insight already.
I marked sentences that I’d like to quote directly (definition of shadowing, how it works). These direct quotations can go in a Cornell Note, CSED row or Everything Notebook or index card
THREAD: Teaching students how to differentiate among various types of reading materials is important, not only for students but also for those of us who are educators.
For example, these papers are specific to “methods”: they describe a method (or a type of innovation to make a method work)
I always tell my students to avoid doing an AIC with methods papers. Instead do a meso-level or medium-level read: look for major themes, ideas, concepts.
These are “empirical” papers: authors apply or develop a new method which then is implemented in a case study, comparative examination or dataset.
Empirical papers, in my view, can be first quickly read using AIC and LATER, do a second round of in-depth reading.
DISCLOSURE: I paid for this book stand with my hard earned and very devalued Mexican pesos. I bought it for $499 Mexican pesos (circa $23 USD) at Costco but I looked for it this weekend and I couldn’t find them anymore (I should have bought 3. Two for my home offices, one FLACSO.
A couple of features will be intuitive like this flexible adjustment contraption in the back. This book stand comes without any instructions and there is only one YouTube video and it doesn’t give much explanation.
The feature that was NOT intuitive at all and took me a while to move from locked to unlocked and back was the adjustable base that holds books and papers. That takes a while to tinker with but once you get it, locking and unlocking is easy peasy breeze.
THREAD. On writing, note-taking, reading, and synthesizing information. This fall, I taught Research Design at the doctoral level, and a Masters' Research (Thesis) Seminar.
Because of the way I like teaching (research design, research methods and mechanics of research), ....
... I quickly realized that teaching Note-Taking Techniques, Reading Strategies, and Synthesis Methods was complicated. It's kind of a chicken and egg problem. What do students need to learn first, reading or taking notes? Teaching strategies for both is hard to do simultaneously
I tried the following sequence:
- Reading Strategies
- Note-Taking Techniques
- Synthesis Methods
- Writing Tips
Turns out that students are thrust into the "you need to read a lot to understand what I am teaching" model quite early during their programmes. This poses challenges
I have been thinking about writing a thread on how to link theory with research, which probably fits with the question that was asked by @PhDForum earlier today - how do we choose a theoretical framework.
I'm going to try to formulate this discussion as clearly as possible.
This discussion about how to link theory with research (and with the method) is one I have had with @salazar_elena and @gcaleman for a while now. How do we link all the theories we read into what we see in the empirical work?
I believe that there are three elements at play.
1) There are various types and levels of theory (grand theory, meso-level theory, micro-level theory), etc.
2) We (scholars, students, practitioners) need to read very broadly to be able to discern across theories.
3) We need to learn how to establish THEORETICAL EXPECTATIONS