(1/12) Our science team looked and we have big questions. How can PCR Testing be used unscientifically? Or even to commit fraud? To preface we are in exploration. We need help from other scientists. Let's count the ways things PCR can go wrong.
(2/12) 1) OTHER DNA PROBLEM. Bacteria, Virus, other human could match. Evidence exists that PCR primers are NOT SPECIFIC to Sars-Cov2. Sometimes multiple primers aren't used so test is less specific! Are we amplifying other DNA? (100% likely)
(3/12) 2) OLD SNOT PROBLEM. ONE old snot photocopied 36 times =69 billion copies (2^36). Fauci admits "at CT36 you don't know what you got, could be dead nucleotides". Evidence is most labs uses high amplification CT35+. Could CT30 "turn" pandemic to epidemic instead?
(4/12) 3) MEN ON MARS PROBLEM. Probability of having Covid depends on pre-test probability PTP. If you test 100 Men on Mars, no matter if 1% false positive rate you still get 100% chance of NOT HAVING VIRUS. If you start testing random groups (students) you can have HUGE % of..
(5/12) ..false tests. The reason to test everybody? Theory is to find silent viral shedders (asymptomatics). But it is curious that in Wuhan, they tested 10 million people, and those who had no symptoms, ZERO of their contacts tested positive. ZERO asymptomatic spread.
(6/12) That means the pre-test probability rate could be very low (like MEN ON MARS), but ironically more testing WILL still show more (false cases) and that can drive more aggressive testing.
(7/12) TESTING LABS ARE STRESSED AND CONTAMINATED. If you run a lab with speed, you will make mistakes or contaminate next test from last. Labs aren't Bio-Safety Labs. Northumbria Uni. found 778 cases but only 78 with symptoms. Could some be a testing lab artifacts? Sure!
(8/12) NO GOLD STANDARD PROBLEM. A TRUE false must be versus a standard. If we isolate the virus in people, prove it was in that person (and not just a 50-100 element sequence of a 30,000 elements) we could compare PCR to that isolation test. BUT this isolation isn't being done..
(9/12) So nobody is comparing the test to real samples and computing, an actual false positive rate of the PCR test. Repeat this again: the PCR test is not compared to anything. If one vendor doesn't work, it is very hard to find out. So we can have a test-demic with no checks.
(10/12) CONSEQUENCES:
PCR Fraud can be used to justify almost anything. PCR-positives can reclassify cause of death of people, PCR-cases can justify lockdown of billions of people, and PCR-panic can force experimental gene therapies on people...
PCR Fraud can be used to justify almost anything. PCR-positives can reclassify cause of death of people, PCR-cases can justify lockdown of billions of people, and PCR-panic can force experimental gene therapies on people...
(11/12) These tests, by virtue of their misuse which seems like a conclusion we might come to, Covid cases are error prone. Practically, if we set the PCR machine cycle threshold to 30, might have half as many Covid deaths? Dr. Mullis Nobel prize inventor of the test did warn us
(12/12) A test-demic isn't new. See AIDS (follow us, see our tweeted video on this). Items 1-5 must be answered soon, else we are being driven off a cliff by a drunk driver. Any scientist willing to educate our team on pts 1-5 reach out. Civilization is locked down, help wanted
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
