On one hand, strong relationships between officials and others on both sides. On the other, not sure Biden has that much respect for the UK or Brexit, and Johnson shows no instinct for realistic foreign policy. I reckon the first will still prove stronger than the second.
Reckon the UK foreign office will be hoping to minimise the PM's actual engagement with the new President, being very happy to be able to return to engaging serious folk in the new administration. Who in turn respect UK officials expertise.
As for the symbolic UK-US trade deal (it has pretty limited economic value, and as many difficulties as benefits, but significant political value for Brexit) I think it could happen, once the new administration work out their approach to trade deals, presuming the UK will sign.
We overdo the importance of personal chemistry of leaders in UK-US relations, forgetting the Presidents with whom is wasn't true (LBJ, Nixon, Carter, Bush senior, Obama). We'll be fine. But Biden will treat Germany and Ireland as more important in different ways.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's one for the self proclaimed free traders in the UK who denied a hard Brexit would mean a significant rise in trade barriers. How do you explain all the new charges and checks to exporters to the EU? amp.theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
Unfair of course. For those pressure groups and the UK government have simply redefined supporting "free trade" to mean sovereignty and raising trade barriers. The opposite of the normal definition.
So when do we get this column about those who claimed there wouldn't be trade barriers with the EU? I guess we won't as that would have to include the PM...
There is a sense of disbelief about the new trade problems between Great Britain and the EU / Northern Ireland. Which we need to lose. This is the new normal. And we face a difficult period of adjustment - immediate paperwork needs, and to longer term uncompetitiveness.
As we trade folk might have mentioned before, outside of the single market and the customs union of the EU, problems at borders are normal. Delays common. Great job of the Brexit supporters to find supposed experts claiming otherwise, but now back to reality...
Such delays at borders were in fact part of the origin of the single market, in the days when the Conservatives didn't see a contradiction between free markets and sovereignty. Such delays weren't really compatible with a supposed common market. So, the single market...
The EU has heard such threats from Boris Johnson many times before, and that's the sound of laughter from Brussels at the gullibility of the UK media believing that this time he will not fold.
Remember the clauses of the Internal Market Bill breaking international law that were apparently needed to prevent border checks between Northern Ireland and Great Britain, and how they were dropped because apparently we'd reached a deal with the EU to prevent these?
It isn't even ancient history, we are being asked to pretend that the government didn't reach a deal with the EU in December over Northern Ireland. A government utterly refusing to take responsibility aided by an opposition having taken a vow of silence. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
The Telegraph cannot admit that the Prime Minister broke his promise on Northern Ireland in October 2019 to get an EU deal, then broke it again in December 2020 to get another, and what is happening is a direct consequence.
A Prime Minister twice conceding to the EU in negotiations what he said no PM could concede is regarded as a hero by the media most antagonistic to the EU. That's one big tangled web we're left with.
As for Northern Ireland, we are likely to see big changes to the way supply chains work there, though something of a battle against the clock to get them ready in time. politico.eu/article/superm…
On future UK-EU relations, much to think about here @fromTGA, most importantly do both sides want the other not to succeed? (the Vidal trap). A potentially permanent negotiation (because that's modern international relations). No responsible minister. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
There are signs that the UK and EU will be a reference point for the other, which will encourage a slightly more healthy competition. Already seen in vaccination and sanctions. But the underlying attitudes of superiority on both sides will always present significant risks.
On EU risks more generally @Mij_Europe has the essential thread of the day on life after Merkel. 2020 was broadly a good year for the EU administratively. Structural issues advanced. But now comes a big change.
I wanted to do other things over Christmas as well than read a treaty. But I figured that with 50% of the country's trade covered it was important. It seems very much in line with the passive approach of the UK government to EU trade that Ministers didn't do likewise.