So many Intro to X books have advice like “start with just a couple minutes a day, slowly and steadily work your way up”
This seems like shitty advice
If someone is into a topic/practice enough that they’re taking time to read a book on it; chances are now is the moment they have the energy to dive in with a significant time investment per day.
Over time that might wax and wane of course.
So it seems like a better structure might be “start with as much time and effort as you can spare without burning out. This will inevitably wane, at which point scale back but never go under x minutes per day”
This is much better at taking advantage of someone’s current motivation burst, while also acknowledging the later waxes and wanes in a way that’s less likely to make someone feel guilty and shitty and give up when they hit a dip.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I knew a girl in Michigan who everyone around me loved and found super sexy and desirable.
She creeped me out. Something about her just seemed slimy, hollow, without any “there” there.
One day we got stuck hanging out alone when other friends left for a bit.
I decided to be a little rude and just straight up ask her some version of “what’s your center? How did you become what you’re like?”
She looked at me a minute, then told me that she’d read “The Art of Seduction” by Robert Greene when she was a teen, absorbed it, and never looked back.
lot of y’all are v optimistic about christianity and Christians
Reality check: what most of you say about your Christian faith would get you excommunicated from the majority of Christian churches. Just because you see yourself as Christian doesn’t mean they see you as one.
one of the Lutheran synods started allowing women to be pastors when I was a kid. People in my church made death threats.
There’s something fascinating here about one-way brotherhood/sisterhood.
We can see ourselves as part of a massive brotherhood, a shared heritage and community,
Even if almost no one in that brotherhood agrees that they share anything with you
In college, a girl in my Beckett class was wearing a necklace w an oxytocin molecule on it
I asked and she said it was a way to remind herself of the importance of love and connection in her relationships
I started seeing more and more of these the next couple years. A tattoo of a serotonin molecule. A silver ring with a dopamine molecule. An art student who filled a whole giant square with interlocked adrenaline molecules in neonbright colors.
Neurotransmitters like this are called Ligands.
The “Lig” there comes from the same root as the lig in “Religion.”
I didn’t find this out til last year, but I love the factoid