1/ I’m not one for ‘told ya so’s but in 1989 when David Duke won the state House seat in Louisiana, some of us said this was an inflection point in American politics. This wasn’t just the logical result of Reaganesque racial dog whistling. It was something different (a thread)...
2/ It wasn’t even George Wallace, strictly speaking, though it was closer to that than Reagan. It was the blatant introduction of racist appeals under the guise of mainstream conservatism, and w/a polish and media-savvy Wallace lacked, as had most previous white supremacists...
3/ Duke knew how to use media. He cut 30 minute infomercials in his Senate run in 1990 — unheard of at the time — to slowly lay out his politics of racial resentment, knowing it would find a home w/white folks angered by previous GOP scapegoating of welfare, etc..
4/ ...but wanting to do more with it than just win an election. He wanted to turn mainstream racially-resentful conservatism into full blown white nationalism. And he knew it would take a while. He was grooming the electorate for what was to come....
5/ And yes, he lost in 90. But he got 60% of the white vote. I want to reiterate that. Six in ten whites in Louisiana voted for someone they all knew was a white supremacist. Indeed, a Nazi. And at the time, folks outside of Louisiana told us, “ah, that’s just LA...”
6/ And in 1991 when he lost the Governor’s race (even though he got 55% of the white vote) people were even more convinced, he was done and the politics he represented was done...They also insisted he was a geographically specific phenomenon...
6/ ...that wouldn’t work elsewhere they said. LA has a “jungle primary” where everyone runs in a big group & the top two vote getters go to a runoff. That plays to extremism, they said. Other places, or national races with primaries would never fall for this kind of politic...
7/ But as my boss at the Louisiana Coalition (the group formed to stop Duke) said: Dukism was “cocaine politics.” Addictive, deadly and easily transported across state lines. But folks didn’t want to believe it. Louisiana (and the south perhaps) was just different...
8/ And then there were the white leftists who said we shouldn’t focus on Duke’s fascism or Nazism. Because that was no better than red baiting by the right against the left. We should just focus on his mainstream conservative appeals. He was no worse than Reagan they said...
9/ Or they insisted we should “go into the union halls and explain to white workers that the rich were the real enemy and racism had exploited all working people.” Mmm-hmmm, ok precious. We explained (with evidence) that their understanding of the Duke phenomenon was juvenile...
10/ And again, that this was different; something immune to regular class-based appeals, whether from the left or from mainstream Democrats hoping a jobs bill or better economy would blunt its force. We insisted that anti racist politics must become the CENTER or progressivism...
11/ But again, we were ignored. And the monster grew, and bided its time. And Duke and others were early adopters of internet based forums and communication technologies. Duke, in 1996, was explaining on his website how the web would allow the proliferation of white nationalism..
12/ And he didn’t even think in terms of social media at the time, but even just websites and listservs and chat boards were being exploited by the far right while the left was still printing out fucking pamphlets and newsletters...
13/ When Obama won and the Tea party emerged, the Duke types realized an opening to push a more fascist narrative with newbies to activism and right wing thinking. They deliberately infiltrated TP organizations and slowly built a more radicalized politic within them...
14/ All of which laid the groundwork for Trump: a guy who, like Duke, understood marketing. Even though Trump doesn’t have the same commitment to nazism that Duke does, he knew how to brand a racist politic with plausible deniability in ways Duke (as a former Klansman) couldn’t..
15/ Which was something we had also warned about literally 30 fucking years ago. And so here we are. So the lesson is, when folks tell you this is who we are as a nation, and this is what white folks do (at least enough to be dangerous), maybe listen, OK? Black folks told us...
16/ And some of us white folks, who were raised to listen to Black people, tried to tell everyone too...but our denial and obstinacy and perpetual faith in the country (utterly unjustified), made it impossible for people to hear it...we are paying the price for that now END
I should add as an addendum, that I forgot to mention the name of my boss at the Louisiana Coalition who saw all of this so clearly and instilled that understanding in me at a young age (21 and 22). It was Lance Hill. One of the most politically astute white people I ever knew
and who still tries to get people to listen to what we were saying three decades ago. He remains an inspiration to me, and someone without whom my own trajectory would have been impossible...and there are very few white folks who have meant that much to me. But Lance is one.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Wise

Tim Wise Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @timjacobwise

15 Jan
I won't lie, and all who agree should be honest: I wouldn't have shed a tear if the terrorists of 1/6 had been put down violently in their tracks. They were trying to kill lawmakers & overthrow what limited democracy we have. Screw them all. Lock them up. Now. And their enablers.
I realize that given the dynamics of a law enforcement apparatus that vastly underestimated the threat, not much more could have been done -- a firefight would have ended w/possibly the overrunning of the building as there were likely more guns in the mob than we know about...
So I'm not saying they should have shot or engaged more violently. Not doing so might have actually been the smarter move tactically. I'm just saying if they had laid these assholes out I would have gone about my daily routine without a second thought, and with a smirk...
Read 4 tweets
7 Jan
1/ A few thoughts re: the increasingly accepted (and somewhat obvious) wisdom that "if the people who stormed the capitol had been Black they'd have been beaten or shot." This is true, so far as it goes, but too simple, in a way that MINIMIZES the power of whiteness in America...
2/ Don't misunderstand, I'm glad whenever white folks begin to see this kind of thing, and we all start somewhere. But there are at least 3 levels at which leaving it with the above argument minimizes the issue of systemic white supremacy (not just privilege)...
3/ First, to say "if they'd been black they'd have been beaten or shot," ignores a key element of white supremacy: the mentality of white entitlement, which led them to think they could do what they did w/o consequence in the first place...
Read 21 tweets
7 Jan
It's not the MAGA mob's whiteness alone that explains why they weren't shot, beaten or arrested en masse. It's bc their rage seeks to reinforce the SYSTEM of whiteness, which they see threatened by Trump's defeat. If they were leftists or antiracists, they'd have been brutalized.
The bigger issue is the way law enforcement responds to people based on whether they are fighting to upend traditional hierarchy and injustice or reinforce and maintain it. If it's the latter, no problem. The former, all bets are off.
This means, typically, that Black and brown folks -- more likely to be protesting existing hierarchy and systems of domination -- will get the brunt of the abuse not merely for being Black and brown but for fighting white supremacy...
Read 4 tweets
2 Jan
1/ What angers right-wing whites about @ReverendWarnock is what angered them about Jeremiah Wright. They can't comprehend the black prophetic tradition. Their Christianity is abt atoning for personal sin. For black folk it's also about atonement for collective sin like racism...
2/ The Black tradition sees Exodus not as a story about ancient Israelites alone, but as a story fully representative of their own search for the promised land -- a search ongoing and NOT fulfilled yet. For white conservatives, America is already the "shining city on a hill..."
3/ The Black tradition allows for an understanding of the cross and the lynching tree as symbolic synonyms (and even quite literal ones) (see James Cone), and to see America's sins as being judged by God...
Read 4 tweets
31 Dec 20
1/ Wanting M4A is righteous & correct. Forcing the vote bc 'people are dying & can't wait' is empty rhetoric bc every rational person knows it won't pass. Doesn't mean forcing the vote is wrong but supporting it as if it will stop even 1 person from dying is grossly dishonest...
2/ The only other arguments I hear are essentially: a) this way we can figure out which Dems to primary (i.e., the ones who won't support M4A) and b) "we've tried it the patient way and it hasn't worked, so fuck it!" Let's look at these in reverse order...
3/ The "we've tried it your way" argument is vapid bullshit. First, the people saying that rarely have tried anything. They scream on Twitter & YouTube. They aren't organizers. They haven't run for office to try it that way. They're just pissed (rightly) and think rage = change..
Read 19 tweets
31 Dec 20
1/ Trumpism is not about ideas. It’s a politic of grievance, which grafts policy onto disaffection as an afterthought. This is why we can’t defeat it with policy proposals or logical appeals to supposed self interest. Trumpers aren’t motivated by these things, but by rage alone..
2/ This is the most fascist thing about Trumpism: its lack of coherent ideology. That vacuum is what makes it possible for a fascistic cult of personality to thrive, and the notion of an autocrat motivated by grudges and the desire to dominate for domination’s sake to flourish...
3/ It’s not even necessarily a conscious fascist politic but a fascism that derives from the base’s “nothing matters” mentality...the idea that owning the libs, making liberals cry, or hurting one’s perceived race, ethnic, religious, gender and sexual enemies is everything...
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!