Quick thread on the Cisco case and @HinduAmerican's response. According to the HAF blog:

"The State of California has asserted that the caste system is 'a strict Hindu social and religious hierarchy,' and therefore an integral part of Hindu teachings and practices." 1/n
Now step back for a moment and consider what's actually happening here: A state government agency in AMERICA is making an assertion in a court of law regarding what constitutes an "integral part of Hindu teachings and practices" 2/n
Put differently: the State of California is insisting that it has the authority to DEFINE the religious beliefs of a billion+ Hindus independent of the views of actual practicing Hindus themselves. The latter are evidently immaterial. 3/n
This is-- to put it frankly-- absolutely fucking insane and should shock ALL Americans. Can you imagine a state agency rolling up to court and insisting that Christianity and Islam enshrine prejudice against "non-believers"? 4/n
They'd rightly be laughed out of court and excoriated for their prejudice. More importantly, the average American would recognize this as fundamentally averse to the first amendment and freedom of religion. Why is this not the case when it comes to Hinduism? How is this OK? 5/n
We recognize that the adherents of the religions themselves are entitled to define their own beliefs. Hindus are not afforded this luxury. Our beliefs-- it seems-- are defined by bureaucrats working for the State of California; 6/n
the State of California is insisting that your views as a "Hindu" are not your own, but rather wholly dependent on the judgment of a court, whose judges apparently have the authority to tell you what YOU believe. Again, this is insanity. 7/n
This issue is distinct from the question of whether the alleged discrimination in this case was motivated by caste prejudice, and whether caste (jati)-- which is a pan-subcontinental social reality--is cognizable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. 8/n
There is a genuine discussion to be had about this question and as Hindu Americans we need to be at the forefront of the fight against casteism, but all Americans should recoil at the prejudicial and unconstitutional, assertions made by the State of CA in this filing. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vishal Ganesan

Vishal Ganesan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @vjgtweets

14 Jan
Excerpt from Fanon's WOTE:
"Instead of being the coordinated crystallization of the people's innermost aspirations, instead of being the most tangible, immediate product of popular mobilization, national consciousness is nothing but a crude, empty, fragile shell" 1/n
"The cracks in it explain how easy it is for young independent countries to switch back from nation to ethnic group and from state to tribe-- a regression which is so terribly detrimental and prejudicial to the development of the nation and national unity" 2/n
"As we shall see, such shortcomings and dangers derive historically from the incapacity of the national bourgeoisie in underdeveloped countries to rationalize popular praxis, in other words their incapacity to attribute it any reason" 3/n
Read 5 tweets
4 Jan
Love reading Aurobindo's old newspaper clips. The excerpt below is from a 1907 column titled "Nationalism, not Extremism" that he wrote in response to a speech delivered by noted Moderate Rash Behari Ghosh regarding the "Extremists" of the Congress:
"The new movement is not primarily a protest against bad Government, — it is a protest against the continuance of British control; whether that control is used well or ill, justly or unjustly, is a minor and unessential consideration."
It is not born of a disappointed expectation of admission to British citizenship, —it is born of a conviction that the time has come when India can, should and will become a great, free and united nation.
Read 16 tweets
4 Jan
The emergent Ghanaian commercial and intellectual elite formed the United Gold Coast Council (UGCG) in 1947 with the goal of independence as soon as possible. Still there were disagreements regarding approach.
Nkrumah wanted independence and also saw the need to democratize the independence movement. The UCGC paid lip service to “independence now” but ultimately favored a more gradual approach.
Nkrumah tried to win over the UCGC but his approach was deemed too radical, so Nkrumah left and formed the Convention People’s Party (CPP) in 1949, drawing support from farmers, petty traders, and low level civil servants, among others.
Read 4 tweets
4 Dec 20
Interesting piece on the geography of farmer suicides in India. Looks like Punjab and Mizoram are the two states where farmer suicides in 2018 surpassed the overall suicide rate. What's driving this?

livemint.com/news/india/the…
"In the analysis of farmer suicides between 1997 and 2012, the researchers argue that farmer suicides are a result of three broad factors, including existing vulnerability in a region, agrarian crisis, and lack of alternative opportunities."
Looks like farmer suicides in Punjab are concentrated in the Malwa region, where land is primarily is leased by "small and marginal farmers" (i.e. holdings of 1-5 acres)

indianexpress.com/article/explai…
Read 14 tweets
3 Dec 20
This is a super interesting conversation, between @srajagopalan and @adam_m_auerbach about slum politics in India
"Interestingly, statistically speaking, in terms of an association, I find a positive association between ethnic diversity and public-goods provision. I think the mechanism through which this happens is that ethnic diversity tends to fragment leadership,
particularly in the beginning stages of a settlement. There are simply more nodes of informal authority with which parties can then extend positions. It intensifies this competition among the slum leaders themselves."
Read 5 tweets
3 Dec 20
I was in Rome a few years ago visiting a friend and I would often stop at this cafe near his place to grab a coffee before I'd embark on touristy things. One day the barista asked me where in America I was from.
I told her I was from Phoenix (not really true, but that's where my parents are), and she asked if we could switch places because she was bored of Rome. That was the day I went to the ara pacis and the villa borghese, both amazing.
I couldn't get her words out of my head. Why the hell would anyone want to trade the beauty, food, and history of Rome for endless suburbs and 120 degree summers? This was pre-Trump, so I don't know if it's still the case, but a good reminder that despite all of its flaws,
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!