Rewinding to the start of it, think about how @AhmarSKhan worked for a public institution that glorified & normalized a bigot who routinely incited contempt for people who look like @AhmarSKhan. Don Cherry was at the top of the heap, a star, Khan at the very bottom...
Yet Khan spoke the truth about Cherry, succinctly and accurately. Saying true things in public is what journalists are supposed to do. The accuracy of his statement was affirmed by the CBC itself when, at long last, they shitcanned Don Cherry's racist ass.
As for what happened next – to state the obvious, it describes the CBC workplace as a hellscape of surveillance, snitching, petty conspiracy and rank hypocrisy...all of which we know. The only shocking thing here is that it was documented and exposed.
I don't find @AustinGrabish's account credible. And his boss Melanie Verhaeghe also behaved despicably.
But it's HER boss, Paul Hambleton (@hambletp ) the CBC's Director of Journalistic Standards, who is getting off easy...
Hambleton had ultimate authority on this. He issued a verdict on Khan that cost the young reporter his job. He issued a ruling from the mount that establishes how EVERYONE at the CBC is supposed to act. And this is what he said:
According to Hambleton, this was, and remains, CBC policy:
When a racialized journalist identifies racism they are engaging in activism, which is incompatible with journalism. They should resign from the CBC and presumably, exit the profession.
So that's where this is left.
CORRECTION: it was of course Sportsnet and not CBC who fired Cherry. Apologies for the error.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
WE buildings in Kenya dedicated to visiting donors were then rededicated after those donors left. A plaque would be installed for a visit then removed & replaced with a new plaque for the next. Multiple parties were led to believe they had "built" the same charity project. 2/x
The actual physical work done in Kenya by voluntourists would be destroyed so the next batch of tourists vould re-do it. We heard of other instances of this. 3/x
A few minutes of digging reveals who he really is: not a blue-collar freedom-fighter but a kid from one of Canada's richest neighbourhoods, whose dad owned the property on which he ran his faux-Texan smokehouse.
If you've eaten at his joint or read the reviews, you know his schtick: the fetishization of Lone Star realness. Meticulous recreation of Texas "authenticity" not just in the food but in the room and in his persona.
It's a Disneyland simulation and he's the princess.
Like his media champion Rex Murphy, he's a privileged guy performing as Joe Sixpack. Plaid flannels, backwards cap, scraggly beard. It's a costume I might throw together at the last minute if I forgot it was halloween.
Craig & Marc Kielburger will testify at a Commons committee tomorrow. It's a rare opportunity to ask them Qs. They've never accepted our intvu requests or answered us directly & I'm unaware of either of them ever agreeing to an accountability intvu from another news org. (cont'd)
Still, I worry that the time will be squandered with partisan speechifying & an over-emphasis on the youth volunteer grant. I realize the grant is the focus, but larger questions about WE are clearly important in assessing the gov't's due diligence here, or lack thereof. (cont'd)
Watchdog @CharityCanada has published a good list of questions they would ask the Kielburgers. charityintelligence.ca/research-and-n… I'll add to those. Here's what I would ask the Kielburgers if I had them under oath: