Charles Lenox Remond was the most prominent Black abolitionist in the US until he was overshadowed by Frederick Douglass.

Remond’s commitment to women’s rights was as deep as FD’s, maybe deeper. He should be remembered for his feminism.

Long thread. Gilded frame containing black and white daguerrotype of a 19
Charles Remond was the oldest son of eight children of Nancy Lenox and John Remond of Salem, Massachusetts. He had six sisters. Their grandfather fought in the Revolutionary War.

The photograph above was taken in the 1850s by Samuel S. Broadbent. via @BPLBoston
Until Charles Remond, the most visible spokespeople for abolition were white. Remond was a founder of the American Anti-Slavery Soc. & the first Black man to lecture widely against slavery.

In 1840, he was invited to join a delegation to the World Antislavery Conventn in London. Old-fashioned pamphlet with big black text heading: "An
In the US & UK, abolitionists had been arguing for months over whether women could participate equally. Misogyny had caused a schism in the US movement. Multiple US delegations went to London. One, from Philadelphia, sent four women; other groups were all men.
Charles Remond was part of another delegation that included William Lloyd Garrison and Lucretia Mott.

About Mott, perhaps the greatest woman of her era, Garrison asked: “In what assembly is that almost peerless woman NOT qualified to take an equal part?” Oil painting of a 19th-century white woman wearing a Quaker-
This one, apparently. The London organizers refused to seat the female delegates.

Charles Remond was *the only Black delegate to the entire convention.*

Everyone was watching to see what he would do.
Remond refused to take his seat if women could not. He and Garrison sat in the gallery with the women. You can find him in the painting.⏫

Remond said later that it was a matter of respect--he would not disrespect the women whose dogged fundraising underwrote the trip.
Back home, the men were hailed for “refusing to lower a noble principle to accommodate a barbarous custom.” A special resolution added: “We, the colored citizens of Boston, feel ourselves ably represented at antislavery meetings in England in the person of Charles Lenox Remond.”
Throughout his life, he leveraged his privilege as a man. In 1848 he opened an African American Anti-Slavery Society meeting in Philadelphia by specifying that “any gentleman _or lady_ who may desire to address the meeting” could do so. @marthasjones_

Remember, this was 1848!
Women’s public participation was still novel. Harriet Purvis ⬇️ was on the business committee at that meeting, with other Black women. Lucretia Mott was there too, and she was impressed at the breadth and inclusivity of the agenda: “the cause of the slave, as well as of women." black and white photo of 19th c. light-skinned black woman,
At the Colored National Convention in 1855, Charles Remond proposed Mary Ann Shadd for membership. She was one of two women there, having journeyed back from Windsor, Ontario, where she edited The Provincial Freeman, a newspaper for the Black emigrant community.
Remond moved to admit Mary Ann as a “corresponding member” representing the Canadian emigrant population - which was fraught for two reasons. Whether to leave or stay and fight in the US was a heated dispute, and she was the only émigré at the meeting.
She was also one of only two women there, and not all men thought women should participate. “This question gave rise to a spirited discussion,” per Jane Rhodes’ biography & @CCP_org. Her membership was approved 38-23, after Remond and Frederick Douglass fought for her.
In 1859, Charles declined to be nominated to the business committee of the New England Convention of Colored Citizens, saying "it was time to elect women to leadership positions in the organization.” (Terborg-Penn)

A man *stepped back* explicitly to make room for women.
By this time, Charles Remond frequently shared a podium with his sister Sarah. She was 16 years younger than he, and becoming an accomplished activist and orator in her own right.
In 1866-67, Sarah and Charles toured New York campaigning for universal suffrage. A state constitutional convention was planned for 1867, and it was an opportunity to correct two major wrongs. No woman could vote in NY, and Black men had to meet an impossibly high property tax.
The state refused to make progress on either front. New York restricted voting by Black men until 1874; by Black women until 1917.

Soon after their speaking tour, Sarah Remond moved to Italy, where she became a doctor and lived the rest of her life.
Charles Remond died in Boston in 1873. He stood up for his sisters, all of them. Early in his life when he had plenty to lose, and later when he was more established, he used his power to benefit women.

#Suffrage100 #BlackSuffragists #SuffrageMen

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daily Suffragist

Daily Suffragist Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DailySuffragist

15 Jan
This poster competition last fall from @AIGAdesign generated images that reflect enduring and current themes of women's voting rights. I’ll showcase a few here. Browse the submissions at buff.ly/39Ar3vA

Left by Jenny El-Shamy; papercut (right) by @LynneYun ImageImage
I love that Mabel Ping-Hua Lee is becoming an icon. By Zonnel Jane Magante Image
. . . along with Shirley Chisholm, who thanks to #KamalaHarrisforthePeople is so iconic that she can be represented without her picture. By Roneka Patterson Image
Read 6 tweets
16 Oct 20
I can’t stop thinking about this girl. Her gorgeous smile, her presence in front of the camera. The photo was taken sometime in the 1860s. @amhistorymuseum shared it on Instagram a few days ago, and I keep coming back to it.

Long thread.
We don’t know her name, because she was invisible to the people who paid for the sitting on Chestnut Street in Philadelphia, and distributed copies of the portrait to friends and family. We know the baby’s name, and her age - to the day.

Looking at her, wondering how her life Same photo, full-size so caption visible: Ada Peters Brown,
turned out, made me think of a different young woman who found herself in Philadelphia about 50 years before. Maybe she too walked down Chestnut Street with a child in her care.

It was 1814, and Charity Castle was doing everything she could to stay in Pennsylvania.
Read 17 tweets
9 Oct 20
The story of Black abolitionist Hester Lane features blatant racism and sexism. But it’s also about a subtler version of both: when you’re expected to choose a side because of your identity, and pigeonholed into what someone like you is “supposed to” believe.

Long thread.
Hester’s story is one of the most exciting discoveries in @marthasjones_' wonderful Vanguard - which is saying something!

Hester was a free woman of color in 1820s New York City. She was an entrepreneur, a leader, and a liberator.
Hester Lane bought the freedom of enslaved people - dangerous work that meant negotiating with southern slaveholders herself. She brought out as many as 11 people - she required them to repay her, which enabled her to keep the cycle going.
Read 24 tweets
9 Oct 20
I am ridiculously excited about a suffrage conference next week...

IHO 150 years of 15th Amdt & 100 years of 19th Amdt, the Massachusetts Historical Society is hosting a 🏅 panel *each day.* @MHS1791 @MHS_Research

Free! Registration at bottom.

Select highlights to tempt you: Image
Monday @ 2 ET

@EllenDubois10’s new work on the long relationship between ElizCadyStanton & Frederick Douglass;

Thomas Dublin with new discoveries & interpretation on #BlackSuffragists

@LynnEckert4 on doctors

and @ProfMSinha tying it all together.
Tuesday @ 12 ET

Marriage! inc. a paper I’m so eager to hear by @HQuanquin about Stephen and Abby Kelley Foster, and more.

Wednesday @ 2 ET

Empire - @Laura_R_Prieto on the Philippines, @SilvanaSiddali on African American voters in 19th c. midwest & Sunu Kodumthara on Oklahoma.
Read 5 tweets
10 Sep 20
We gotta talk about lesbians. Specifically, about lesbian erasure.

Queer is cool, right? It’s 2020! 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️etc., etc. So why is the lesbian reality of the suffrage movement barely part of the #19thAmendment centennial conversation?

A thread.
The movement for women’s liberation was run largely by unmarried women - some never married, some widowed.

Why? Because marriage was a prison for women, legally and socially. Unmarried women were exponentially freer to do the work of organizing and building a national movement.
Long-married leaders who raised multiple children - ElizCadyStanton, IdaBWells - are outliers in the suffrage pantheon. Most of the women who led the movement didn’t marry, didn’t have children, or were widowed early.

Does that mean they were lesbians? Well, yes - many of them.
Read 17 tweets
23 Aug 20
Suffragists picketed the White House from 10am-6pm every day but Sundays. They continued - attacked by mobs, arrested constantly - for more than two years. But in their first months, the pickets were greeted warmly.🧵 Sepia photograph of fourteen suffragists in overcoats on pic
Until January 1917, no one had ever done what they were doing. Frustrated at President Wilson’s refusal to support a federal suffrage amendment, they were the first Americans to stand outside the mansion in protest.

They walked 4-hour shifts, leaving only when relief arrived.
They continued in every kind of weather, though in heavy rain and snow shifts were 2 hours. To stay warm, the janitor from National Woman’s Party HQ brought wheelbarrows of hot bricks to stand on. In this picture from Jan. 26, they’re standing on boards to keep their feet drier. Sepia photograph of three National Woman's Party picketers f
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!