I'd like to help all Tether FUD deniers who are announcing they've proven the FUDsters wrong, by listing the actual FUD items, so that they can base their denying on something. The "it's been proven many times before so I won't detail it here" seriously lacks entertainment value.
First, I'll play the devil's advocate, & list all the FUD that's wrong.
1. There's proof USDT prints correlate with Bitcoin pumps.
Bad FUD. Even if that was the case, USDTs could be legit, with real buyers coming in. Also, Tether could be hiding the pumps by printing in advance.
Finally, some USDTs could be minted to pump Bitcoin, while others would be minted for other activities (arbitrage, money laundering, paying for Chinese prostitutes), and you'd never have any correlation.
2. USDTs are minted on weekends, Tether can't receive wires on weekends!!!
Bad FUD. Tether's customers could wire reserves in advance. Tether could trust its customers and credit them with USDTs (remember - they can always freeze them) before the wires come in. I could find 10 ways to explain weekends, all better than Paolo's "everyone banks at Deltec".
3. USDTs aren't backed.
Bad FUD. Of course they're backed. The question is, by what? Is it real hard cash? Is it customer IOUs, like fiat? Is it Bitcoin? Is it the trust everyone has in the peg?

Now time for the good FUD, the stuff that's actually problematic. Go wild on these.
1. Tether has never done an audit.
Good FUD. They promised they would, but didn't. Plus they kept posting legally non binding bullshit letters that meant nothing. If I were a big institution, I'd find that suspicious and wouldn't trust them with my money. After all, there's USDC.
2. The Bitfinex loan was a big fuck up.
Good FUD. Nobody says this was good, but I'd like to explain why it was awful bad. Tether were saying that USDTs are 100% cash backed. The loan meant they could make the cash disappear at whim. Institutions would never trust that behaviour.
3. They keep flip-flopping about their reserves.
Good FUD. If people supposedly have entrusted you with $25 billion, surely you must have your shit together and can explain where these $25 billion went. If not, it means you're an insider shitshow & nobody else should trust you.
4. USDTs are not legal claims on Tether's reserves.
Good FUD. If you're not a Tether customer (one of the USDT exchanges), in case nobody wants to buy your USDT, you can wipe your electronic ass with them. Even if you're a Tether customer, Tether can do whatever they want.
They can wait for months before redeeming your USDTs, they can redeem them in-kind, with whatever shit they have in their reserves at whatever price they're marking them. Oh you have 10M USDT? Cool, here's 20 ETH valued at $500,000 each. Go wild!
No institution would accept that.
5. They keep making these stupid tweets about how legit they are and how they're regulated by the FinCEN (which is legally a moo point), and then there's the McCormack interview. Again, if I were an institution with billions under management, I would never trust that shit.
Here's my verdict. I worked at an "institution" for many years. My job was mostly reading hundreds of pages of documents per day to decide whether we could entrust somebody with our clients' money on the terms outlined in the documents. If one thing smelled fishy, you were out.
That's the most important rule of banking and investing: understand whom you're giving your money to, & on what terms. If you don't do that very, very well, you won't be investing or banking for long. Tether supposedly has $25 billion, that means their customers are big & smart.
NOBODY BIG AND SMART WOULD GIVE THEM A DIME. Not on those terms.
Trolly out.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trolly McTrollface

Trolly McTrollface Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Tr0llyTr0llFace

19 Jan
On the importance of leverage for the crypto ecosystem.
A long time ago, BNP Paribas bought a retail forex exchange, because they thought they'd get an insight into forex trading flows and positions. What they quickly discovered, is that the website was a muppet slaughterhouse. Image
People would get stopped out ALL THE TIME because they used too much leverage. Over 90% of them lost money in a consistent way. Those are worse than even casino odds.
That's why around 2005, you had so many forex trading websites popping up. They would offer up to 500x leverage.
The higher the leverage, the better (for the website).
This became such a huge trend that regulators stepped in, and introduced maximum leverage rules. Something like x30 for forex, if I remember correctly. All of a sudden, all the ads and Premier League sponsorships vanished.
Read 12 tweets
2 May 20
Allow me to present the only piece of news in crypto that's worth your while. It's about what's really backing Tether's stablecoin.
It's not dollars.
It's not Bitcoin either - not entirely, at least.
It's loans to miners, backed by Bitcoin.

Follow my train of thought on this.
We all know miners need real cash to pay their electricity bills. They could sell their rewards on exchanges - which someone (cough Tether cough) would have to buy, to prevent $BTC from crashing. But when everyone knows that everyone knows, something different happens.
Tether has real money, because Bitfinex has real money from sheering muppets dumb enough to trade on its exchange. But why would they buy miners' Bitcoins, when they can LOAN them the money instead, and get a death grip on their balls?
Tether is secured by these loans, not cash.
Read 10 tweets
9 Apr 19
Bitcoin fanboys believe that Bitcoin is deflationary because they don’t understand what “money supply” means.
They think “money supply” is the same as “hard money outstanding”, and think that a limited number of Bitcoins means that “Bitcoin supply” is foreseeable and limited.
This is wrong. Anyone can increase the Bitcoin supply beyond 21 million by lending their Bitcoins against IOUs. Just as with fiat, where hard fiat outstanding is worth a few trillion USD, yet total debt is >$300T, Bitcoin credit can make Bitcoin supply unlimited and unforseeable.
This “limited Bitcoin supply” meme has its roots in a childish interpretation of money. Most of modern finance isn’t done with hard money, but with credit.
We could have fractional reserve banking with Bitcoin, just as we did with gold 100 years ago.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!