On the importance of leverage for the crypto ecosystem.
A long time ago, BNP Paribas bought a retail forex exchange, because they thought they'd get an insight into forex trading flows and positions. What they quickly discovered, is that the website was a muppet slaughterhouse.
People would get stopped out ALL THE TIME because they used too much leverage. Over 90% of them lost money in a consistent way. Those are worse than even casino odds.
That's why around 2005, you had so many forex trading websites popping up. They would offer up to 500x leverage.
The higher the leverage, the better (for the website).
This became such a huge trend that regulators stepped in, and introduced maximum leverage rules. Something like x30 for forex, if I remember correctly. All of a sudden, all the ads and Premier League sponsorships vanished.
Forex gambling is still around, but not nearly as profitable, because it takes time for people to lose their money with a pitiful x30 leverage. Currencies usually don't move by 3% in a day. It can take weeks for an amateur trader to lose it all. Plus the adrenaline rush is gone.
Enter crypto.
It's hard to explain how one-sided leveraged crypto trading is. Traders don't stand a chance. With currencies, you could expect to extract SOME money from real world flows. In crypto, there are no real world flows. It's just traders against traders against insiders.
Of course leveraged trading is very fun and addictive. So the flows are substantial. Regulated exchanges don't offer leverage, because it's a pain in the ass legally - just look at Coinbase dropping it recently. Because cryptos aren't currencies, you have to deal with all this
crap about ownership and being able to deliver the goods that's just not worth it. Plus the CFTC thinks cryptos are commodities, while the SEC thinks they're securities, and you have to deal with regulations for both.
That's why offshore, unregulated exchanges sprung up so fast.
Those exchanges are a huge threat to the crypto industry, because they're serving US citizens, which is illegal, and regulated exchanges knowingly serve as on-ramp platforms and enable US citizens to fund their gambling accounts there. It all hangs on a very thin thread.
But those unregulated exchanges are also an absolute bonanza, because they create huge demand for crypto as for on-ramp purposes, and - crucial point - this crypto is then lost by gamblers back to the crypto industry. This creates a one-way flow of real cash into the system.
This cash can then be used to pay for mining, for infrastructure, PR, you name it. People buying Bitcoins and holding isn't nearly as interesting a business as people buying Bitcoins and losing them by getting rekt on Binance. A HODLer is a risk because he can sell his Bitcoins.
A rekt gambler will simply buy more.
Unregulated offshore exchanges are feeding the rest of the crypto industry. They're also feeding regulated exchanges. Regulators are looking into it. The difference with forex, is that laws already exist that should prevent what's happening.
Regulated exchanges just pretend like they don't know. But they do. When the hammer drops, it will be Armageddon.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trolly McTrollface

Trolly McTrollface Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Tr0llyTr0llFace

17 Jan
I'd like to help all Tether FUD deniers who are announcing they've proven the FUDsters wrong, by listing the actual FUD items, so that they can base their denying on something. The "it's been proven many times before so I won't detail it here" seriously lacks entertainment value.
First, I'll play the devil's advocate, & list all the FUD that's wrong.
1. There's proof USDT prints correlate with Bitcoin pumps.
Bad FUD. Even if that was the case, USDTs could be legit, with real buyers coming in. Also, Tether could be hiding the pumps by printing in advance.
Finally, some USDTs could be minted to pump Bitcoin, while others would be minted for other activities (arbitrage, money laundering, paying for Chinese prostitutes), and you'd never have any correlation.
2. USDTs are minted on weekends, Tether can't receive wires on weekends!!!
Read 14 tweets
2 May 20
Allow me to present the only piece of news in crypto that's worth your while. It's about what's really backing Tether's stablecoin.
It's not dollars.
It's not Bitcoin either - not entirely, at least.
It's loans to miners, backed by Bitcoin.

Follow my train of thought on this.
We all know miners need real cash to pay their electricity bills. They could sell their rewards on exchanges - which someone (cough Tether cough) would have to buy, to prevent $BTC from crashing. But when everyone knows that everyone knows, something different happens.
Tether has real money, because Bitfinex has real money from sheering muppets dumb enough to trade on its exchange. But why would they buy miners' Bitcoins, when they can LOAN them the money instead, and get a death grip on their balls?
Tether is secured by these loans, not cash.
Read 10 tweets
9 Apr 19
Bitcoin fanboys believe that Bitcoin is deflationary because they don’t understand what “money supply” means.
They think “money supply” is the same as “hard money outstanding”, and think that a limited number of Bitcoins means that “Bitcoin supply” is foreseeable and limited.
This is wrong. Anyone can increase the Bitcoin supply beyond 21 million by lending their Bitcoins against IOUs. Just as with fiat, where hard fiat outstanding is worth a few trillion USD, yet total debt is >$300T, Bitcoin credit can make Bitcoin supply unlimited and unforseeable.
This “limited Bitcoin supply” meme has its roots in a childish interpretation of money. Most of modern finance isn’t done with hard money, but with credit.
We could have fractional reserve banking with Bitcoin, just as we did with gold 100 years ago.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!