A few more years of this and we'll be a failed state.
It is hard to imagine a radically different future for the country in which you live. But plenty of nations have flipped from prosperity into political and economic collapse, often through gross misrule.
Gross misrule is the UK's other pandemic.
And there's currently no vaccine.
The usual treatment is effective opposition. But, given the scale of the crises we now face, Labour is being remarkably quiet and passive. It should be mobilising its base in protest, while articulating a fresh and exciting political vision.
A crucial aspect of this vision is political reform:
Proportional representation, so the many can never again be dominated by the few.
Get the money out of politics.
Cut Murdoch and the other media barons down to size.
Build a new, more participatory democracy.
The crisis makes a much bolder and more radical Opposition response necessary.
It also provides an opportunity for a new politics, that wasn't there before.
Why isn't Labour grasping it?
If Labour doesn't articulate a new vision, if it doesn't signal a clear break from Boris Johnson's corrupt, incestuous, chaotic, authoritarian politics, if it doesn't first frighten Johnson into changing course, then evict him at election, state failure becomes a likelihood.
I'm told that Starmer is playing a long game.
In my view, playing a long game in a national emergency represents the triumph of strategy over success.
In the meantime, it is surely now clear that the best protection against ongoing disaster for the people of Wales and Scotland is independence, and for the people of Northern Ireland, reunification.
I know that would leave England in an even bigger mess. But we have to sort out our deep problems, rather than relying on princes over the border to rescue us.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A lot of words need to be eaten by people who were not just wrong about the pandemic, but dangerously wrong. They bear some responsibility for the catastrophe we now face.
A big part of the problem is that the BBC chose to interpret its duty of "impartiality" as providing airtime for people who contested scientific facts, even when they were demonstrably wrong.
It has made the same mistake with issue after issue.
And sometimes it's not a mistake.
Sometimes it's an attempt to generate noise.
If people talk about your programme, that's deemed a success, even if they do so for all the wrong reasons.
A day of shame for a government that has screwed up its pandemic response worse than almost any other.
Through a lethal combination of incompetence, callousness and corruption. theguardian.com/world/2021/jan…
When this is over, there must be a proper reckoning. Not a limited inquiry chaired by a government stooge, but an independently-appointed, full public investigation with an open and evolving mandate.
We should also demand an official period of mourning for all those killed and disabled by this terrible, avoidable catastrophe.
So far, Boris Johnson has scarcely acknowledged the victims of the pandemic.
This is the mind-blistering fact that everyone should be aware of. The government still has *no plan* for ending the pandemic. Or even for ending the lockdown. I knew we had a troupe of clowns in charge, but this is beyond incompetence.
My column. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Taiwan's most recent death from covid-19 was on May 11th last year. It stopped the virus without lockdowns. How? Mostly through its genuinely world-beating test-trace-isolate-and-support system, developed with the help of participatory democracy. Compare, contrast and weep.
See those numbers on the y axis? They are the actual numbers. SEVEN deaths in total from covid-19, in a nation with over twice our population density. This is what competent government looks like.
At every turn the government has undermined public trust and unity, by creating the impression that rules are for little people, while the elite can do what it wants. theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
Compare and contrast.
Oh, and by the way, we're still waiting for @MattHancock to speak out against Dominic Cummings's trip.
He condemns ordinary people driving 5 miles.
But not Cummings driving 264 miles.
Heaven forbid that "scrub" (ie regenerating woodland) should be allowed to return to our treasured wet deserts. And thank goodness the BBC is on hand to warn us about this terrible threat.
It's quite right, though. Without repeated grazing by sheep, the denuded, eroded landscape you can see in this photo would revert to natural vegetation, which in the Lakes is temperate rainforest. Perhaps @BBCCountryfile could explain why that's a bad thing?
Allowing the land to rewild would create habitats for a wide range of species and draw down carbon. Recovery starts with bracken and "scrub", then continues through ecological succession towards rainforest.