This is a very interesting chart and analysis indeed. The negative correlation is, of course, expected but the scatter is surprisingly huge. The countries in the bottom left are in the spotlight here; the worst of all by far seems to be Greece.>
The authors give two valid points: "Possible explanations include governments’ preference for directing emergency funds to support the rest of the crisis-hit economy and of course the possibility that in some of these countries the intensity of the pandemic was relatively weak.">
In the case of Greece, emergency funds were indeed provided to other sectors, but it was controversial as >E20mln were given to mainstream media who were already, by law, mandated to broadcast public health campaigns for free & media is a sector not terribly affected by WFH etc.>
(Not to mention that the list of recipients of this funding was a scandal on its own by cherry-picking media favourable to gov't..) Also noting that those countries are indeed mostly in South Europe, I can't help but comment that this is also the legacy of a decade of austerity.>
Austerity is basically hard-wired in the country's mindset and this is why increase in military expenditure must be taken with a pinch of salt (different discussion.) Another broader reason for GR's pitiful position in that chart is, of course, incompetence.>
Though it had no issue taking swift decisions that do not require organisation, mid/long-term planning such as lockdown, or punitive measures that overly rely on police like hefty fines or ban on outdoor swimming, it struggled to meaningfully boost the Greek NHS.>
Having said that, going back to the chart, this is clearly a complicated matter to draw conclusions based on regressions, because we can see that, for example, Czechia, even though it started from a good position of healthcare $ as %GDP *and* increased healthcare $ significantly>
, still was a disaster. Also Sweden is a curious case. Having the maximum Healthcare $/%GDP doesn't mean much if you still take wrong key decisions./>
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Νήμα 100% βιωματικό για ΕΙΟ.
Κάθε Φεβρουάριο η Ελλάδα οργανώνει το Athens Eurolymp. Για τους Έλληνες αθλητές είναι εξαιρετικά σημαντικό γιατί μαζί με το πανελλήνιο πρωτάθλημα καθορίζει την κατάταξη (ranking list) και πρόκριση για εθνική ομάδα.
Είναι ανοικτό όμως και σε αθλητές από ομοσπονδίες κρατών της Ευρώπης αλλά υπό κανονικές συνθήκες πασχίζει να προσελκύσει αθλητές εκτός Ελλάδας. Συνήθως έρχονται μόνο αθλητές από Βουλγαρία, Τουρκία, Ρουμανία, Ισραήλ, Κύπρο, Ιταλία. Το 2004 όμως ήταν διαφορετική χρονιά,
με τους Ολυμπιακούς της Αθήνας μόνο μερικούς μήνες μακριά. Ήταν μοναδική ευκαιρία για πολλούς πρωταθλητές να δοκιμάσουν τα νερά στα οποία θα αγωνιστούν αργότερα. Το κόστος συμμετοχής ανά αθλητή κανονικά ήταν περίπου Ε80. Εκείνη την χρονιά όμως η αισχρή ΕΙΟ το ανέβασε στα Ε150!
What a flawed analysis by @nytimes EdBoard:
"An attempt by Germany [to mediate] foundered when Greece announced an energy deal with Egypt that effectively claimed rights to a broad area of the sea, which it did in response to a similar accord between Turkey and Libya." 1/x
In other words, the @nytimes equates the Greece-Egypt martime boundary deal with the blatantly illegal Turkey-GNA deal.
[Article link: nytimes.com/2020/08/30/opi…]
2/x
"... competition for fossil fuels should have given way by now to competition over how to stop using them, especially among countries that have subscribed to the Paris climate agreement."
May we remind @nytimes that Turkey has NOT ratified the Paris Agreement?
3/x