Nathan Ruser Profile picture
18 Jan, 23 tweets, 10 min read
THREAD:
A new @ndtv report shows satellite imagery showing a village (2020扶贫村) constructed by China on the banks of the Tsari Chu (ndtv.com/india-news/chi…). It seems to be within Indian claimed territory, but before a Chinese installation that's been in place since before 2000
First, let's look at a timeline of the site. In December 2019, the site was a forested confluence of a stream and the Tsari Chu river, by April 2020 the area had been cleared, and some construction appears to have begun. By August, much of the construction seemed mostly finished.
The bigger issue with boundary disputes between China and India like this is not just that both sides have different claims, but they have different interpretations of eachother's claims. In Galwan/Pangong that was the main sticking point.
So in order to determine the severity of this provaction you have to know two things that are hard to know:
1) Where India considers India's claim to end;
2) Where China considers India's claim to end.
The two main places to look for India's perception of the claimline is the official state maps prepared by the Survey of India, see surveyofindia.gov.in/pages/state-ma…
This is the map screenshotted in the top post. It shows the village 7km into Indian territory.
BharatMaps also shows the village 4km within Indian-claimed territory (red cross shows the village location, dashed line shows how far across the claim line it is). bharatmaps.gov.in/newversion/map…
It's claim line is 2.9km beyond the international boundary demarked by the US state dept.
On that note, the US DoS LSIB is a global database of borders as recognised by the US government. In this part of India it appears to be what Google is using to mark its boundary. data.humdata.org/dataset/large-…
The village is 2km beyond that line.
This is why I said it appears to be within Indian territory, because, according to Indian government sources, and US government sources, it is within Indian claimed and controlled parts of Arunachal Pradesh.
However it appears to be RIGHT on the edge of China's idea of the claim.
Most official Chinese maps show only their claim, and show all of Arunachal Pradesh as Chinese territory.
This is the best map I've seen showing the disputed territory in this part of the border. It appears to be a screenshot from a Chinese GIS service. Village = Red cross
Although it should be noted that the residential area that has been constructed clearly expands across this border in areas. The red line on this satellite imagery shows approx. where that disputed claim begins per the above map.
Another Chinese source which is generally accurate is the township level boundaries, it often reflects areas under control. This is the official boundary of Migyitun township (扎日乡), which shows the whole area including the long-standing Chinese installations I'll get to soon
Another source worth checking is Open Street Map, here it shows a claim line different from any of the above sources (and shows the village beyond the Indian claim), so I'm not sure what to make of it here.
Because of so many different and contradictory versions of the claim lines, it's important for the Indian government to state whether they believe this village is within Indian territory. Something I suspect they will refuse to do.
It sure appears to be though.
Beyond the claims, let's look at the defacto control on the ground, which is where this contruction appears to be squarely within Chinese control. And appears to have been since at least 2000.
The imagery annotations included in the NDTV report mention an older military installation (形琼普张营地) that was constructed prior to the village. Google Earth shows it's been there since 2000.
The Xingqiongpuzhang barracks appear to be the barracks location for three or four futher outposts, the futhest most of which is apparently only 3km from the nearest Indian border post (I believe at Majia).
Indeed, the village itself is built along the Migyitun to Xingqiongpuzhang Defence Highway (扎日至形穷普张边防公路), which continues roughly 2.5km beyond the village.
I'm unsure of the name of the village, and can't find any local media reports about it. On OpenStreetMap it is tagged as "2020 Poverty Alleviation Village" (2020扶贫村) and was added to the map on Dec 15th 2019.
I suspect that means that China understands this construction is quite provocative and within Indian territory, as it hasn't heralded its construction, unlike a similar village built within internationally recognised Bhutanese territory.
One final thing that I will note, something that shows how safety for the occupants and genuine poverty allevation isn't forefront in China's mind when it builds these villages in other countries. During construction there was a major landslide, coming within 40m of houses.
TLDR:
In 2020, China constructed a village of around 90 houses within what appears to be Indian territory, however it is roughly 2.5km North from a Chinese military border post that has existed for decades.
Apologies this thread was a bit rambling and without structure, I had dinner and (I'm pretty sure) broke my toe in the middle of it, so that knocked me off my game a bit.

Fin!
22/22
Here are some photos from the ground of that village.
H/T @Mioplosus_bass

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nathan Ruser

Nathan Ruser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Nrg8000

18 Jan
Can anyone explain this? Israel has already vaccinated nearly 30% of its population, yet infections are still rising at record rates? Infections beyond the US'.
I assume there's a delay between vaccination and protection, but even 14 days ago 15% had been vaccinated.
btw this isnt anything anti-vax or like "GOTCHYA DOCTORS" just curious about why we're not seeing an effect or is it stopping an even steeper climb so the effect is hidden or targetted(/racialised) vaccinations and different people getting infected?
A helpful suggestion:
Someone in DMs also mentioned that the mental safety-blanket of a coming vaccine is probably causing people to take more risks and be less mindful in how they might spread the disease.
Both of which make sense.
Read 4 tweets
15 Jan
It's completely shameful for a special rapporteur at the UN to lend the legitimacy of her role to a website that routinely and almost exclusively presents absurd conspiracy theories and historical revisionism for dozens of places across the world, including Syria and Xinjiang.
Not only is it shameful, but it's completely inappropriate. Imagine a UN official for human trafficking conducting an 'Ask me anything' on 8kun, or a Qanon forum, & you have an idea of how much of an affront this is to genuine victims, or frankly, anyone interested in the truth.
Read 5 tweets
10 Jan
This whole 'investigation' is hilarious. While they're talking, a satellite image showing ~1,500 detainees being forcibly transfered literally over their shoulder.
They also say that the BBC is wrong because that re-education camp has closed. Hence the transfer we see.
Here's a free tip to whichever propaganist intern is told to make the next debunking video:
Saying 'this particular concentration camp has closed therefore all the reports of concentration camps (that we just confirmed) are wrong' isn't the own that you think it is.
Their last effort to debunk showed drone video filmed 8km away from a prison as a way to disprove it. So at least this time they've put in more effort, even if it is equally unconvincing.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
@jsrailton @lehudgins High-res face shots of the group. Photos of outfits to follow, and wider shot.
@jsrailton @lehudgins Full outfits plus full shot.
@jsrailton @lehudgins This bloke might be with them too, hard to tell for sure if he's marching with them or just nearby.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jan
Chinese State Media in a live-stream today shows off a remotely controlled gun for police. They explicitly mention that this platform is meant for lethality, to "shoot the criminals". It's similar to a bomb-defusing robot, with a live weapon (anyone want to ID the gun?) attached.
Here is its control terminal.
It's called the uBOT-OCU, which I guess confirms its relation to bomb-defusing platforms, with a uBOT-EOD developed by (I believe) the Taihong Weishi Security Equipment Company, see: ipsc007.com/product-4-1182…
They also showed off a gun that can shoot around corners, and seemingly (the CGTN translation isnt perfet) can be automatically fired at a specific target by touching a screen where you want the gun to fire. Don't take that feature as confirmed though.
Read 6 tweets
14 Dec 20
Reporters from the BBC visited a detention facility in Xinjiang's Kuqa that opened in mid-2017. In May 2019, a 35,000m2 factory opened directly adjacent to the camp. Less than a week after it was completed, satellite imagery caught ~1,500 people being moved to the factory.
The line stretches 200m between the camp and the factory, called Kuqa Pomegranite Seed Industry Co (库车石榴籽实业有限公司), and with a rough density analysis you can estimate the crowd at around 1,500 individuals. Moving DIRECTLY from a camp to a factory.
During the week between when the factory was completed and when a mass transfer of detainees was captured by satellite imagery the detention facility itself was significantly desecuritised. Watchtowers were removed, internal fencing was lowered and concrete walls were removed.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!