I think there's a couple of things here. If your history goes working class, then parents not, then you not, it doesn't necessarily follow you are more secure than your parents. Or that you have joined a settled, middle class world. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
I'll be the first to say that I don't really 'get' middle class people. I really don't. So I'm just guessing about their motivations. Access to capital is for me one of the big things where class is a divider when young, but sometimes less so when people are my parents age
When I was in my 20s I couldn't understand where people of a similar ages money came from. There was a similar perplexity at my lack of it. I went from working in social care to university with no saving and stuff. But even then my dad, who was unemployed paid my rent for a year
Friends of my dad had things like caravans after working their lives in the brewery. Nice houses, too. But that wasn't the same as middle class people's houses.
The things I really don't get about middle class people are my own little bag of prejudices: the idea that sex and drugs and drink and hedonism are somehow daring and a path to personal discovery. The idea everyone knows a bit of French. Idea there is a common corpus of knowledge
I think the biggest thing I don't get is the middle class thing of assuming that there is a safe, honest, respectable world and a dangerous, murky, disturbing world and that those worlds are easily divisible and any experience of the murky world is an incursion
I always say 'we're only ever a couple of bad days away from being on Jeremy Kyle' and I mean it. The family, friendship and where you grew up links with the side of life that middle class people cast judgement upon is a real thing. And it's not exceptional, or often noteworthy
I think the the thing that I most don't get is the lack of stories about an extended community. That middle class people didn't grow up knowing who the local families were, didn't grow up knowing who was such and suches mam or cousin. That they do gossip wrong.
And if you're working class, you know what 'families' mean. And it's not what you've just assumed if you're a middle class person reading this.
And the biggest thing I've noticed is that middle class people never ask me what it was like growing up but working class people do. And then we tell stories about school and work and places we've lived and people we knew and knew of.
The other big thing I've noticed is that anything I say about the relationship between me and being working class is always taken as an analysis of class relations and thus open to debate, rather than my own perspective from within a set of experiences and relations
Allied to that is the assumption that 'growing up working class' just means 'growing up in a working class family' rather than growing up in a working class world. I'm not just talking about me and my family. It's the whole sum of place, time, people, economic and social life
What I mean when I say 'I don't understand middle class people' is I don't understand the world you grew up in and internal world it shaped for you. I don't understand how the world around you shaped how you feel in the world. I get hints from books and reading, but it's opaque
I come from a different place and a different way of being in the world. I won't grow into an middle class person if you just nurture me. But when I suggest I don't understand middle class people it's like I have revealed a prejudice or am just showing off.
Also, whenever I say working class, it's assumed I am deploying a blunt, lumpen rhetorical device, and that any thinking about class from someone who is working class must be blinkered and rough hewn. My understanding of working class is intersectional, does include diversity
Me being working class isn't a political position, it's a description of a particular set of social and economic conditions that create a cultural identity of breath taking range and diversity. Why would you assume I don't know people differ from each other?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Know what? Looking at amount of people who have died from Covid-19 in the UK, abject failure to take steps to prevent this, refusal to make it possible for people to be safe and muddled triangulation of policy against imagined public opinion: it does matter who is in government
'Ah, Mark, nobody could have prepared for this, it's unprecedented' A better government could have been better unprepared and could have taken action based on not being fucking shit at things that didn't involve playing to their own gallery like shit toastmasters at a charity do
Every government fails in ways that are both universal and predictable and in ways that are idiosyncratic and theirs alone. Other governments have made their own mistakes. But this government have made mistakes that are entirely their own. They have failed at using the state
"Pandemics are by definition situations where infectious diseases outstrip capacity of our modes of social organisation to control their transmission. The built environment we need to reduce transmission of this potentially lethal virus doesn’t exist yet" tribunemag.co.uk/2021/01/in-def…
We have a virus which is transmitted in certain ways. Then we have the disease the virus causes, the effect of which is influenced by numerous factors of social organisation. Covid-19 is ripping through the world because we are not changing things needed to prevent both
The reason why covid-19 is a pandemic is because the way we organise our world is what this particular mutation fitted to spread easily. In the UK we have lost so many because we have held back from change because those who make decisions assumed change needed is harder than loss
You know the shitty free school meal scandal? Companies taking contracts like that to offer a service to the public in need used to bank on those people being so invisible they'd never get a complaint out into general public knowledge. This is now an epic miscalculation.
Everything that is bad about the web is also what's good about the web. The web and social media allow the very quick aggregation of people's experiences as they occur and then the quick dissemination of the things aggregated. This changes things greatly
Those paltry free school meals parcels seemed to be acceptable to send out to company because 1) the people commissioning them and the people receiving them were once shielded from each other 2) the people commissioning them would in the past never seen the end product
I think it's a good idea to argue antidepressants and other medications might not be the best first step in a stepped care model. But people don't usually seek help when they feel a bit off they seek help when things are really bad. And therapy/counselling is uncertain quality
We can have arguments about medicalising of human responses to adversity all we want, but we do currently have mainly medical services as our first point of contact when people are feeling awful. Alternatives would be good, and we should build them. But they aren't a quick fix
I don't think we're talking here about people who either are busting to prescribe antidepressants or people who are gasping to have them. But we're also not talking about having few off days. We're talking about people feeling 'holy shit, I have no idea of what to do about this'
This pandemic is happening because our society is not set up in ways that make it possible to prevent the spread of Covid-19. Our society will either change because of effect of Covid-19 or it could change to prevent things like Covid-19 pandemic happening again. We have a choice
The reason why UK is fucking up so badly is because our decision making is clogged with people who do not want anything fundamental to change unless it directly benefits them and our public discourse gives clout for regressive voices over progressive ones. We are seeing effect
Fundamentally, the question is: what would you give up so that everyone can be safe, warm and happy? And the answer in relation to making our country safe in this pandemic for too many is: I would give up fuck all. What our country is and how it works will not prevent Covid-19
Looking at the usual rehearsed hot takes about hungry children and families and thinking: people love to judge others levels of personal resourcefulness and to imply that they would know 'ten simple tricks' to solve the problem as if being in need were a failure of imagination
Hot takes around poverty are absolutely dripping with survivorship bias, as are any discussions of need where there is a notion that personal coaching can overcome systemic inequality. People literally only listen to the experiences of those who overcame, not those who cannot
People with their hot poverty takes absolutely adore valourising their own life hacks while suggesting that other people's attempts to get by are silly, misguided and morally reprehensible. Yes, your way of getting through worked for you but there were loads of people that didn't