Ash Sarkar Profile picture
18 Jan, 10 tweets, 2 min read
Staying well out of this beef, but I've spent the last 48 hours in hysterics since I learned that an influencer has been getting fans to give her money by calling it "individual reparations."

That's the joke line I use when I want one of my white mates to get a round in!
I get how this dynamic emerges. Social media blurs the distinction between influencer and activist. Individuals are seen as totemic of a wider political struggle, so you want to see them succeed. And of course, supporting people's work is meaningful.

But it's not reparations.
Reparations isn't an individual white person giving money to an individual black or brown person (apart from when I'm broke and want a cocktail, in which case it's very much that).

It's about recognising that

a) colonialism and slavery have had a lasting economic impact
b) this impact is not just a legacy, or a long tail.

It has been reinforced by the underdevelopment and debt servitude of the Global South, and the exploitation of labour and resources from the Global South.
And unless you're a billionaire or a central bank, it's unlikely that your PayPal activity is going to make much of an impact on the root causes behind the Global Movement for Reparations..
(Also, if you're a billionaire or a central bank, you're probably why there needs to be a Global Movement for Reparations, but I don't think that's my core audience tbh)
If you, as a white person, want to give money to a black or brown person because you like their work or you think it's politically useful, that's great.

But if you're serious about wanting to support reparations, it can't be an individual thing. It's about movement building.
I think what's going on is that there a lot of young, socially conscious white people for whom the last few years have been a big wake up call. Which is good!

But they're not necessarily politically active - more that they're avid consumers of political content.
That means people who produce politically-flavoured social media content can equate supporting them with supporting the politics.

And it works because social media encourages us all to see individuals with a platform as totemic of the values we want to see in the world.
There's room for influencers to cynically exploit that, and come up with what is essentially intersectional Thatcherism.

The solution to that, imo, is better movement building. White people shouldn't just be supporters of antiracist struggle - they should be participants too!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ash Sarkar

Ash Sarkar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AyoCaesar

11 Jan
Talk of imposing a one hour exercise rule, or being able to exercise with one person from another household, is just theatre. It's not about suppressing transmission - it's about keeping the focus away from the fact that what we're seeing is the result of failed policy.
The hospitalisations and deaths we're seeing are from infections which predate the national lockdown.

It's a legacy from a time when the government insisted schools were safe to open, when households were mixing for Christmas, when the flawed Tier system was still in operation.
We've also known since September that self-isolation rates are woefully low. According to SAGE than 20% of people in England self-isolate when told to do so. According to the Department of Health, the proportion might even be as low as 11%.
Read 8 tweets
10 Jan
I don't think saying 'Labour is the party of family' is necessarily an anti-single parent or homophobic dogwhistle, but it's so devoid of content that it lends itself well to reactionary signalling unless you're clear that you mean something different by it.
What would Labour being pro-family mean (beyond an acceptance that yes, humans do reproduce as mammals and that Keir Starmer's cool with it)?
Labour could say they'll introduce a Finland style 'baby box' for expectant parents.

Or they could frame a 4 day working week in terms of achieving a proper work-life balance, so people can spend more time with their loved ones.
Read 4 tweets
4 Dec 20
The situation in India is increasingly dangerous and authoritarian: the governing BJP party in Uttar Pradesh enacted a law which gives the state unconscionable powers to prevent and punish inter-faith marriages.

Why? Because they back a conspiracy theory known as 'love jihad'.
This conspiracy theory, that there's a nefarious scheme to force the conversion of Hindu girls to Islam through marriage is patently absurd. For as long as India has been a multifaith country, there have been mixed marriages and conversions - my own family amongst them!
My grandmother (Hindu, now Muslim) married my grandfather (Muslim), my mother (Muslim) married my father (Hindu). No forced conversions, no jihad, just people enjoying their freedom to love - and subsequently divorce - who they like.
Read 7 tweets
20 Oct 20
Putting aside the fact that they’re engines of class inequality, private boarding schools are just intensely fucked up places to send your children. It is just so intensely damaging.
I never met people who went to boarding school until uni, and it was honesty mad hearing what went on. All the things that made their parents mistrust the state system (bullying, violence, substance abuse) were not only endemic at these boarding schools, they were inescapable.
You’re sending your kid into that environment when they’re like 11, and putting them into the care of people who - no matter how well intentioned - don’t love them. What kind of message does that send to your child about how you feel about them?
Read 6 tweets
10 Aug 20
Keir Starmer is weak on tackling institutional racism, imo, because he’s scared to further alienate voters who felt Corbyn was weak on law and order. The gamble is that BAME voters don’t have anywhere else to go on Election Day.

The problem is, we can always stay home.
Starmer doesn’t have to stop being who he is to get better at this stuff.

All that “I’m a sir and a QC, I’m not scruffy, I’ve met the Queen” thing could actually make him a decent broker between two bits of the Labour coalition who have very different experiences of policing.
You can talk about policing both in terms of injustice and ineffectiveness when it comes to addressing the root causes of violent crime. You can talk about the recommended criminal justice reforms in the Lammy report. Talk about fairness and equality before the law.
Read 4 tweets
8 Aug 20
Dunno if there’s a problem in Labour with race. All I know is that a staffer briefed a Sunday Times journo that I’d flounced out of HQ in disgust when the 2019 exit polls came out.

Small problem... I wasn’t even there. They’d just seen an entirely different brown woman.
The journalist in question took down the tweet as soon as they’d been made aware of the fact that, when I was meant to be storming around Southside I’d been doing a livestream at Novara HQ. Which is good! But I think that microevent speaks to a culture in the party bureaucracy.
And it’s one where disdain for the left overlaps with, and is amplified by, racism. Because the target of your ire is a factional opponent, little thought is given to your own blindspots or personal bigotries, and those things get even more entrenched.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!