SCOOP: The Pentagon has authorized hundreds of active-duty troops to support enhanced security measures related to the inauguration, as local law enforcement continues to track threats of violence in the nation’s capital this week. politico.com/news/2021/01/1…
The 750 active-duty personnel deployed this week include service members with expertise in handling chemical, biological, nuclear, radiological and explosive weapons, as well explosive ordnance disposal and medical teams skilled in trauma response - per defense official
Altogether, the Pentagon has authorized roughly 2,750 active-duty personnel to support the inauguration, but the bulk of those — about 2,000 — are for “ceremonial support,” such as the band, the official said.
The active-duty teams will join the roughly 21,500 National Guardsmen currently deployed to the National Capital Region helping civilian authorities respond to the threat of potential violence in the days leading up to the inauguration.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As Trump leaves office, @BryanDBender and I got new details about just how ugly the transition was at the Pentagon. DoD blocked the Biden team from gaining access to critical info about current ops, including the Afghanistan drawdown and Warp Speed. politico.com/news/2021/01/2…
The effort to obstruct the Biden team, led by senior White House appointees at the Pentagon, is unprecedented in modern presidential transitions and will hobble the new administration on key national security matters as it takes over positions in the Defense Department today.
“They really should not be allowed to get away with this. It’s just completely irresponsible and indefensible,” said one transition official. “To play politics with the country’s national security is just really unacceptable.”
Retired Gen. Lloyd Austin arrives for his SASC confirmation hearing. The room (not the usual location) is very large and very empty - just a handful of press and staffers.
Austin kicks off his testimony by acknowledging the reservations some lawmakers have expressed about "having another recently retired general at the head of the Department of Defense."
Incoming National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan on @CNN once again dings DOD for dragging its feet on transition activities - refusing to meeting with key transition members or respond to requests for information. @FareedZakaria
DOD is now “finally” starting to schedule meetings, but the delay hurts national security, he says. Background: politico.com/news/2020/12/2…
Sullivan says he sees potential areas of cooperation with Russia, particularly in nonproliferation and arms control.
The Trump team tried and failed to renegotiate the landmark New START arms control treaty that expires soon after @JoeBiden takes office. politico.com/news/2020/10/2…
DOD spox also cites facilitating a classified videoconference between members of Biden's DOD ART and the intel community ART. This doesn't really count as a meeting between DOD and the transition team either.
DOD spox also cites a meeting between the DOD agency transition director and Biden's DOD ART leadership to discuss "prioritized RFIs and the schedule for interviews starting Jan. 4."
This is basically a meeting to discuss scheduling the more important meetings.
President-elect Biden says reiterates that his transition team encountered "obstruction" from the Department of Defense's political leadership.
Also says that many of the agencies that are critical to US security have incurred "enormous damage" under Trump
Biden says the transition is not getting the info that it needs from the Trump admin in key natsec areas. He calls for "full visibility" into DOD and other agency budget planning "in order to avoid any window of confusion or catchup that our adversaries may try to exploit"
A transition official tells me that DOD has continued to "deny and delay" meetings with the transition. There has been "no substantial progress" since the issue came to light earlier this month.
NEW: I spoke with Trump's former four-star head of the Coast Guard about his decision to endorse Joe Biden. He told me it was due in part to an "insurgency" on Americans' constitutional rights that has occurred on the commander in chief's watch. politico.com/news/2020/09/2…
“I've seen an insurgency, if you will, on our constitutional rights and more power being centralized at the executive level that has really divided our nation," Zukunft told POLITICO. "I am concerned that our constitutional rights are being infringed upon from within."
Zukunft was driven to endorse Biden by the 2019 shutdown over funding for Trump's border wall, which left the Coast Guard's 40K force working without pay. He is also concerned by Trump's dismissal of science, both on climate change and Covid-19.