Hi all - the TurnInIt tweet thread about #1776Report is blowing up in a way I never could have expected, so, some context/clarifications:
1. The % score for TurnItIn doesn't necessarily mean anything definitive. You have to still check everything that is highlighted. 1/
2. One thing that gets tagged a lot is direct quotation. Papers with any quotes usually get tagged for plagiarism. With proper citation, this is fine and normal! The 1776 report did not include any citations. 2/
3. The rest of the % is usually comprised of small common phrases (usually these don't mean anything) and sometimes longer passages. This is where we usually detect plagiarism. 3/
4. In the case of this report, some longer passages were tagged, including material from an Inside Higher Ed essay and from the Heritage Foundation. Initially, I thought these were clear examples of plagiarism... 4/
But reading more carefully, these documents were written by some of the authors of the report. It seems that they were recycling their own material. 5/
5. I believe we can call this self-plagiarism. Now, as I tell my students, self-plagiarism is still plagiarism! It is different in kind but it still requires citation. 6/
The morals of this story:
1. (To me) Don't tweet.
2. (To everyone else) Cite your sources appropriately! (Even if it is yourself.)
3. (To all of us) Context matters! Good history, writing, and analysis requires nuance. 7/7 #Twitterstorians
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@DeGolierThomas@jackiantonovich It hits at 26%. Most of what's in here is just direct quotations from sources (though not cited), but it looks like a chunk was lifted from this website: isi.org/intercollegiat… And a little from Wikipedia too.