🚨New preprint! 🚨 In 2 observational social media studies (12.7 mil tweets) + 2 behavioral experiments (N=240) we examine how reinforcement and norm learning amplify moral #outrage expression on Twitter w/ @mollycrockett@killianmcl1@tuanars123 (🧵👇) | psyarxiv.com/gf7t5/
We proposed that two design features of social media platforms interact with social learning mechanisms to impact outrage expression. First, we argued that streamlined social feedback delivery (e.g., salient + quantifiable likes/shares) leverages reinforcement learning 2/n
At the same time, on the platforms users are organized in large networks where local norms of expression are highly salient b/c they are displayed in users’ news feeds. This design is very likely to tap into people’s tendency to learn from observation, i.e., norm learning 3/n
We tested this empirically. We used supervised machine learning to build a moral outrage classifier trained on 26k tweets labeled for outrage expression. We collected full tweet histories (12M+ tweets) of more & less politically active users in 2 prereg observational studies 3/n
Before results, here are some caveats: not yet clear if findings generalize beyond Twitter platform or U.S. political context. Our classifier performs pretty well (F-1s > .70) but room for improvement with more training data. Beta testers welcome! (see below for more info) 5/n
Key finding 1: positive social feedback for outrage expressions associated with increased likelihood of future outrage expressions, consistent w principles of reinforcement learning. Small effect size but likely conservative estimate due to time-course of learning (see paper) 6/n
Key finding 2: Outrage expressions are strongly associated with expressive norms in users’ social networks, beyond users’ own preferences, suggesting that norm learning processes guide online outrage expressions. 7/n
Interestingly, we also see interaction of social reinforcement and norm learning: users in more extreme networks where outrage is more normative may be less sensitive to social feedback. 8/n
Two preregistered, confirmatory behavioral experiments used a mock Twitter environment to manipulate social feedback and norm perception. We replicate findings from observational studies and demonstrate causal influence of social feedback and norms on outrage expression 9/n
Results suggest that interaction of psychology and tech design help explain moral behaviors on social media. Platforms are *not* neutral and neither are we; we come to platforms with ancient emotions shaped by small-group contexts (see also journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…) 10/n
Our studies also showcase how studying psych processes on social media allows us to ask new questions: in our case, the organization of users in large networks allowed us to examine interaction of reinforcement and norm learning when they are typically studied separately 11/n
Open methods 🔓🧪 A beta version of the outrage classifier is available to academic researchers - feedback is welcome. For more info see: github.com/CrockettLab/ou… 12/n
We also include a lengthy SOM (link in preprint) that goes into extensive detail of our process of building a classifier by using psych theory and machine learning together; we hope it can serve as a useful guide for those interested in measuring psych constructs in text 13/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New #preprint: we use range of psychological theory / data to develop a model to explain the spread of moralized content online via: motivation, attention and the design of social media (the MAD model). w/ @jayvanbavel@mollycrockett | psyarxiv.com/pz9g6 | summary below 1/6
We start by reviewing data suggesting that expressions of moral values and emotion spread rapidly during political discourse online. We examine how morality and emotion can spread online through social appraisal processes 2/6
What facilitates this ‘moral contagion’ online? We start with the *motivations*: from Social Identity Theory, we argue that moral-emotion expressions help uphold ingroup image. From partner choice theory, we argue that moral-emotion expressions can enhance our reputation. 3/6