Call me crazy but if any political figure believes deep down that America would be better off as a white ethnostate or whatever, I'd prefer they just openly campaign for that rather than cloak it in "restoring our glorious founding heritage" and other code words like this. 1/
Like if you ask a normal person "Do you want a White Nationalist candidate on the debate stage?" they'll of course say no. But I'd prefer that to what we have now - people who believe the EXACT same thing but know to dress it up in euphemisms about our "values" etc. 2/
If that's our choice, then I'd prefer to just openly have that debate, rather than have to spend 95% of the discussion having to pierce their camouflage. I think it's the camouflage that gives mainstream voters enough of a fig leaf to pull the lever. 3/
"We only worry about illegal immigrants!" But Trump cut legal immigration, too. "Of course, because we worry about foreigners taking jobs!" But you're not asking for a wall at the Canadian border. "We're only worried about crime!" But you're cutting education. Just say it! 4/
There are tens of millions of Americans who 1) believe the USA would be better off without "those" people and 2) would never ever say that out loud or even to themselves. It's always cloaked under "concerns" about "inner city crime" etc. I'd prefer to have it out in the open.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason "David Wong" Pargin

Jason

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnDiesattheEn

19 Jan
One thing the events of Jan 6th made clear is that the vast majority of people who like to threaten violent revolution have a ridiculous, cartoonish, immature idea of what such a thing would actually look like. The reality of it, if glimpsed for one minute, would flatten them.
And I'm not even talking about "Our opponents have guns, too!" but just the everyday reality of living in that situation. They're picturing badass battle scenes, not their screaming child dying of diarrhea because water, sanitation and healthcare services have been disrupted.
They're not imagining the sadists who run wild in a power vacuum, the unchecked sexual assaults, navigating black markets for basic supplies, shivering in the winter because gas and electricity systems have been bombed, losing access to their money because assets have been frozen
Read 5 tweets
11 Jul 20
I could spend all day on why The Old Guard on Netflix is hilariously bad, but I'll start with this: Charlize Theron plays an immortal warrior who is at least 2,000 years old who has grown disillusioned because the world "just keeps getting worse." Worse than ... 2000 years ago?
To her, the concept of "clean drinking water" on demand would still be an amazing novelty. The concept of women not dying in childbirth, of getting to sleep through surgery, of not dying of routine infections, all would still be relatively brand new in that time scale.
It's such a silly and insulting appeal to 2020 viewers. "Literally no one has ever had it harder than you, person who can afford all of the things required to watch streaming video on demand!" The real version of that person would marvel at the idea of "paved roads everywhere."
Read 4 tweets
11 Jun 20
If a tiny fraction of votes swing differently in 2016, right now Hillary's re-election would be down double digits to Trump (who you know would have run again), who'd be running against her COVID-19 response that left like 30K dead or something. And he'd be dominating.
It'd be so perfect for him because he could run on pure venom. It'd be 100% "If you'd let me build the wall, not a single person would have died" and vicious attacks on how this is what you get when a woman is in charge of anything. There'd have been like 3 impeachments by now.
The GOP controlled Senate wouldn't have approved a single judge, having established that they will not approve any judges from the opposition party. Anti-Hillary content would be the biggest windfall right-wing YouTube could have ever imagined. The sheer hate would be stunning.
Read 4 tweets
24 Apr 20
One of the weirdest yet important trends I saw in my years at Cracked is something that is rarely discussed: As readers migrated from browsing on desktop to mobile, their preferences and behavior changed completely, but NOT because readers got dumber/worse (they didn't). THREAD!
On mobile, all reader preferences or tastes were soon replaced by just one: URGENCY. Any piece that was a little creative or playful in its delivery or that drove home its point in an ironic or backhanded way, was traffic death. Everything had to be directly stating facts. 2/
In the desktop era, readers would bookmark a site and just visit every day to see what fun thing you'd planned. On a phone, readers would browse some link aggregator (reddit, facebook, whatever) and only tap on the links that seemed the most urgent. 3/
Read 15 tweets
12 Mar 18
"How can white people let racism from their leaders slide, just because they happen to agree with their other policies?" For the same reason Women's March leaders are willing to let Farrakhan's anti-Semitism slide: theatlantic.com/politics/archi… And I mean, word for word.
“When you are labeled an anti-Semite, what follows can be very, very devastating for black leaders. To have someone say that about you, it almost immediately creates a feeling of defensiveness because you know the outcome.” That's what the right says about being called racist!
This is all I've heard from the right for YEARS. "Of course I reject those comments, but he also stands for sound policies like lower taxes for working people, protecting citizens from terrorism ..." The bigotry is just one part of the puzzle, they say.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!