Took two questions for Starmer to visibly enrage the prime minister.
Starmer focusing on the deletion of hundreds of thousands of criminal records. PM says he doesn't know how many investigations damaged.
Starmer: Deletion impacting live policy investigation and includes DNA records marked for indefinite retention - therefore most serious cases. But days after incident came to light, PM still can't answer basic questions.
Starmer asked how long it takes for the wrongly deleted records to be restored to the policy database. Johnson has no answer, except that they are working "round the clock" and then bangs on about how much they have invested in policing.
Fish in barrels. Starmer turns to covid. Quotes Patel saying she wanted to close borders last March. Why did he overrule her. Johnson says something about Captain Hindsight.
Starmer repeats the question: "Why did he overrule the home secretary"? Johnson says Starmer "supported an open border approach" in March and calls Starmer a "weather vane".
We're not getting very far with these. The pattern is set. Starmer wins them all. I don't think you can credibly suggest that it's otherwise. Each week the same dynamic, each week any normal observer would conclude the opposition leader was on top of it, the PM wasn't.
I can;t think of a single one where you could say Johnson came out of it looking more prepared or competent. Even his gags don't land.
There's only so much impact this has. Most people don't watch PMQs etc etc. You've heard all that before. But when a government is against the ropes, it's useful to have a fairly reliable event each week in which you make the weak spots as painful as possible.
It's also quite effective at chipping away at Johnson's credibility as people watch him week after week struggle in the spotlight.
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango.
Ed Davey has the most dreadful artwork in his house. Like the kind of thing you'd see in a mid-range suburban hotel.
Neil O'Brien having a nightmare with his phone. We've had pretty much every Zoom meeting nightmare so far in this PMQs.
I love the way the Speaker treats this like a 80s gameshow. "Let's head up to Lancashire with Rosie Cooper. Rosie Cooper."
He'd be fucking great at bingo.
Johnson says he "remains the champion of liberty in all its aspects". Apart from the liberty to live somewhere else, of course, which is the bad kind.
Right fuck that shit. Back to CNN.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So many on the British right were seduced by nativism. They took Trump's election, coming right after the Brexit vote, as a totem of a new global status quo.
It is fascinating to now see them dissemble, downplay, delete, deny and redefine their support in a desperate scramble to reformulate their position.
Some will have a true moment of reflection about where this kind of politics leads. Others will try to salvage their reputation, as they suddenly glimpse what a future evaluation of their behaviour will conclude. Others just want to preserve parts of the nativist project.
Without many people noticing, Anneliese Dodds is putting together a credible, deliverable left-wing economic programme which can maintain business support politics.co.uk/comment/2021/0…
Dodds is very impressive indeed - a properly big brain thinking hard about how to attract business support for Labour while simultaneously setting out a radical and sustainable Keynesian agenda.
I can' tell you what a relief it is to read her speech. This is someone thinking things through, trying to come up with a long-term framework, and reflecting a sense of national and historic responsibility.
So easy to just say 'the Muslim ban is over' and leave it at that. But most people have no idea of the scale of human suffering repaired by doing so.
Countless people of Middle Eastern origin who had built lives in the US were unable to see their families. They couldn't come to see them and if they left they had no idea whether they'd be able to get back into America.
It's over now. But they had no way of knowing Biden would win. If it had been Trump, the situation would have continued for another four years. Perhaps it would never have changed.
This is correct. Johnson can hold off a referendum. But doing so would make the case against the Union more forcefully than any other course of action imaginable and all-but guarantee independence when it was eventually held.
Terrible situation to be in. But that is the situation they have created. At the moment, and unless something changes, Brexit is ushering in the break-up of the Union.
People asking what will change. The most obvious thing is the dynamic of a referendum. Brexit makes the political case for independence much stronger, but the economic case harder. Most SNP figures privately concede this.
The precise things which were warned about for four years during the Brexit debate are now happening, right before our eyes scotsman.com/news/politics/…
If it wasn't for covid, this would be the main news story, day after day. But it isn't going anywhere. Businesses already hammered by coronavirus are being pummelled into the ground.
So far, everything is playing out exactly as people warned it would: A sudden mass of bureaucratic requirements, the difficulties with groupage, the nightmare of export health certificates.