1/ Some Biden officials have referred to this list as an "opportunity [...] to be patient and extract concessions from China in exchange for tactical adjustments to policy"
They're just going to keep most of it and make token moves while trying to get China to make big ones
2/ This is why I think China should just refuse negotiations and go hard in the paint. No sense in starting negotiations when your opponent feels confident. Gotta soften up their political consensus first. There are a few levers China should push on:
3/ First, to raise the implicit costs of US intervention in Taiwan, update China's nuclear posture: state that any attack on Chinese territory (including Taiwan island) or on Chinese merchant shipping by the forces of a nuclear power may incur an 'unrestricted' Chinese response
4/ Time the update with some DF-41 tests to drive the point home that US intervention re Taiwan will likely mean fallout over the Acela Corridor
5/ Second, begin a quiet campaign of nonstop Taiwan reunification exercises. Unlike the recent PLAAF exercises, hold these under a media gag order. Give the US the sense that Operation Taiwan could happen at any time if the TSMC ban holds.
6/ Third, begin accelerated plans to shift out of USD-denominated reserve assets and reach out to the EU/Russia/Middle East about a "multi-currency" future. Make preparations for US financial sanctions that might come if an Operation does happen.
7/ Concurrently, unwind UST positions in a jerky/chunky manner at the same time as Treasury auctions, so as to create uncertainty in the Treasury market around a disorderly unwind. Do this in parallel with the Biden admin's spending proposals to maximize pain for US fiscal policy
8/ Begin targeted 'fines' against US companies in sectors where EU/Japanese/Korean firms are also competing in China. Not enough to drive them away, but enough to erode their position in China. Tesla is a great target here, as the EU carmakers want to succeed in China's EV market
9/ There are areas where cooperation can make sense, like climate, energy, healthcare, etc. China should participate, but do the minimum necessary, while setting up alternate fora for each topic led by China that drives alternate global consensus
10/ Lastly, China should set up a commission to investigate, document, and publicize US human rights abuses in Iraq and Afghanistan, with the goals of 1) getting Ir/Afg to call for reparations from the US and 2) pressing Biden officials over their support for the wars in Iraq/Afg
end/ These actions would be reversible, give China relative control of the escalation ladder, create meaningful costs for the Biden strategy of trying to extract concessions from Trump-era policies, and set the stage for a sustainable and fair US-China relationship.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tbh, this declaration is a net plus. By standing by Pompeo's genocide declaration, Blinken just clarified China's strategic calculus by removing US ambiguity around a possible reset. China can now move on Taiwan island without any hesitation around what it might be missing out on
This makes the Operation Taiwan thread I've been working on a possibility rather than an outside conjecture. Is the US really sure it wants this? There are no good outcomes for the US out of such an op. Biden will very likely be more hated than Trump by the end of it.
China's logic is that if the US is willing to stick to its guns on a proclamation where it has very little credibility, then the rest of its China policy is going to be similarly unreasonable. In that case, there's no point in negotiating on anything
Country that killed over 1 million Muslims since 2001 through its 'War on Terror' says China is guilty of 'genocide' against Muslims for teaching them to appreciate life and avoid terrorism
To quote @przidnt1: A 'genocide' where the population grows and standards of living & life expectancy increase. Can can the Native Americans get some of this 'genocide?'
"China straight up needs to sanction any country that agrees to this bullshit. Just tell America: fuck you, your companies can't sell or buy from here anymore. Go apeshit all the way down the line" - @przidnt1
2/ The root of this lies in Rene Girard's theories on human behavior and culture, namely one quite accurate insight: humans want what other people want, and the act of achievement itself spurs other people to strive. This can create conflict when the thing to be had is scarce.
3/ This shows up as a theme in literature. Dan Wang describes this very well using Game of Thrones as an example. To summarize, at the start, Robert Baratheon sits on the throne after he led a rebellion against the Targaryens... danwang.co/girardian-mime…
Agency: "Got a special job for you, you're going to help us prove this person at China's Wuhan virology lab was COVID's patient zero"
You: "What are we going off of here"
Agency: "Shitposts on an anti-CCP dissident forum and the ramblings of Matt Pottinger and Miles Yu"
You: "Looks like she left the lab in 2015"
Agency: "White House says that's propaganda. Keep digging"
HRC kicked off the SCS mess in June of 2010. The US told China in late 2009 "let's work together to rebuild the global economy", then less than 8 months later backstabbed China on the SCS by ambushing them with Vietnam at the ASEAN Ministerial.
I was in Beijing in late 2009. The US was literally begging China to lend money and save the world.
Then, right after the loans from China's 08-09 stimulus program finished making their way through Chinese banks/SOEs into purchases with MNCs, HRC timed her backstab at ASEAN.
@qin_duke's thread provides useful info on the SCS, so I'll add some context here. China wasn't even briefed that the US would be bringing up UNCLOS and China's 9-dash line to the rest of the ASEAN countries during the Ministerial. It was a literal diplomatic ambush.