A few thoughts and some reflection on the day while memories are fresh. In electing @JoeBiden, we just elected a very good man to be our President.
We just might have elected a great one. Thread:
1/ I woke up this morning reflecting on a fascinating and thoughtful interfaith conversation we had last night with @edstetzer (and others), focused on how we heal from January 6. For the full discussion, see here. facebook.com/RepSeanCasten/…
2/ My opening comments focused on the fact that America has only twice been attacked from within. At Fort Sumter in 1861 and earlier this month.
3/ When we are attacked from without, we rally around our founding documents and their moral underpinning (faith- and secular-based). But the last time we were attacked from without, we elevated unity over moral certainty.
4/ Frederick Douglass said "the bitter cries of the heart-broken slave are drowned by the religious shouts of his pious master". Lincoln heard that, and understood it. But in his 2nd inaugural he only faintly echoed the moral part:
5/ "It may seem strange that any man should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces, but let us not judge lest we be judged." He put union over moral clarity.
6/ Later in our conversation, Michael McCoy of Wheaton College made the beautifully-insightful observation that forgiveness is an act of individual grace, and is not at odds with justice. Our moment demands forgiveness with justice, not in lieu of.
7/ Now fast forward a few hours to this morning. Sitting on the steps of a Capitol that was just attacked by enemies from within. Sitting with a crowd much smaller than normal, composed substantially of fellow members who were in the Capitol complex on 1/6.
8/ Knowing that the rhetoric of some of those members contributed to that attack. And wondering how @JoeBiden would address that tension. Would he follow Lincoln's lead and elevate unity and forgiveness, even if at the expense of justice? Is there any other option?
9/ And then a speech that oozed empathy, love and decency. That emphasized our shared humanity, our shared democracy, our unity based on a commitment to respectfully - and peaceably - disagree.
10/ But also a speech that did not shy away from acknowledging the scourge of white supremacy, or the threat to our democracy that comes from situational ethics and tribally-defined truth.
11/ In short, a speech that hinted at - maybe even promised - what Lincoln could not. Unity and accountability. Forgiveness and justice. A chance to be great.
I'm inspired. /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@GOPLeader's utter lack of a moral or factual north star will be his legacy.
400K dead of COVID. Massive WH criminality. Surging white supremacy. Record-breaking deficits. Frayed international alliances. January 6.
And a man with the gall to call himself a leader says this.
Look: unity is important right now, and some may see this as provocative. But we cannot move forward if we just sweep everything that got here under the rug. We tried that after the Civil War. It didn't work.
A commitment to unity and accountability shouldn't be partisan. But as long as it is, we have to be call out those fanned the flames of insurrection and now call for bipartisan unity to avoid personal accountability.
Since you asked, here is peer reviewed research of large scale epidemiological data showing that COVID-19 spread significantly slowed down in states that mandated mask wearing vs those that didn't. healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hl…
In other words, people are alive today because other people paid attention to science and wore a mask. That is nothing to be angry about.
Here is a similar study looking at international data that found slower spread in countries with more cultural receptivity to mask wearing. researchgate.net/publication/34…
A few thoughts on MLK. The beauty and sadness of his words is their timelessness. Beautiful because they keep resonating. Sad for the same reason. In that vein, take some time today to read his "Moutaintop" speech. (short thread): afscme.org/about/history/…
1/ For context: this was the speech he gave the day before he was assassinated. He was facing tension from within the civil rights community asking whether he was past his prime. His agenda was to expand the cause beyond issues of race to launch a poor people's campaign.
2/ The timelessness. He understood then, as was true in reconstruction as is still true today that the biggest barrier to racial equality in the US has always been those who would convince poor white people that they are better than poor black people.
Every member of the @GOP calling for unity before they call for accountability and admit their complicity - whether silent or otherwise - should be ignored. The adults have work to do. While you're ignoring them, read this: thetriad.thebulwark.com/p/the-republic…
Today I called on leadership of the @ILGOP to accept the results of the November election and condemn those in their party who are continuing to incite attacks against our democracy. m.facebook.com/story.php?stor…
Here in DuPage county, multiple candidates who lost in free and fair elections have continued to mount protests and use rhetoric directly linked to the attack on the US Capitol on January 6.
Before January 6, that was a nuisance, but could be written off as the efforts of frustrated political dead-enders. After January 6, this must be seen in a different light.
This is one of the most accurate pieces I've read about the current @GOP. Encourage all to read as we think about how to heal our nation after 1/6. A few additional thoughts: nytimes.com/2021/01/09/mag…
1/ First, the overwhelming majority of Americans are good people who believe in Democracy, rule of law and equality for all. We are a fundamentally good people.
2/ The problem is that we do not have a majoritarian government. But for peculiarities of the electoral college, neither George W Bush nor Donald Trump would be president.