This is nonsense logic that does not survive even cursory thought.
The government does plenty of things that make it possible for private actors to "censor.
Does freedom of association make *everyone* a state actor?
The government does plenty of things that make it possible for private actors to "censor.
Does freedom of association make *everyone* a state actor?
https://twitter.com/amychua/status/1348731260911411200
I suppose it makes a lot of sense to analogize allowing private companies to control their property with allowing others to obstruct access to not their property.
At least, it makes sense if you choose not to think about it.
At least, it makes sense if you choose not to think about it.
https://twitter.com/amychua/status/1348731611320352770?s=19
Now show me where #Section230 demands content moderation as opposed to allowing providers to make their own decisions.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
Go ahead, I'll wait.
https://twitter.com/amychua/status/1348731612419268614?s=19
Go figure @VivekGRamaswamy is a biotech bro and his co-author on this is a disgraced laworof.
What complete drek.
What complete drek.
*lawprof, who Chua is fucking married to lol
Disingenuous through and through
Disingenuous through and through
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
