@RaoulGMI I only need once sentence for each of these:
$AAVE will be the world's largest bank & asset lender.
$SNX will be the world's largest synthetic asset provider.
$UNI will be the world's largest exchange.
$YFI will be the world's largest asset allocation protocol.
$AAVE is one of the leading asset deposit / lend protocols. #1 in TVL (Maker ahead, but that's a CDP protocol for DAI). Team busts their butt to add new integrations with other protocols and to build bridges into real world.
@RaoulGMI IMO, $AAVE is probably my top pick to be the most valuable protocol in DeFi for the near future.
It and other lending protocols will act like huge billows, bringing in real world liquidity (as USD) to fuel people going long on crypto in DeFi (as they can continually earn yield).
@RaoulGMI BUT once that liquidity is in DeFi / crypto as a result of platforms like $AAVE, I expect that a lot of it is going to stay.
That's the interesting part of all of this, and IMO will be a huge valuation driver for DeFi overall.
@RaoulGMI $SNX is the leading synthetic asset platform on Ethereum. That alone is interesting, but check out their recent integration with Curve where Synthetix Synths are being used as a fungible cross-asset liquidity layer.
@RaoulGMI Basically, any Synth can be converted to another synth without any slippage.
This allows for BIG swaps between assets with potentially no slippage.
@RaoulGMI Finally, $YFI is the leading "set it and forget it" deposit protocol. In a space that's all about yield, Yearn automates the seeking of it for users across other DeFi protocols.
Yearn is also increasingly becoming a "family" of vertically integrated protocols.
@RaoulGMI Where will that all lead? TBD, but IMO, there is great value which could be tapped here. And the community is mega strong.
The vision of Yearn is about making assets productive and helping users earn yield. When considering what's possible on chain, it's practically limitless...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ I've written comments in the @iearnfinance / $YFI forums in recent days on investing in the protocol's future growth.
First & foremost, I think devs should be compensated for their work & any actions taken should be focused on optimizing for long-term growth of the protocol.
2/ I'm open to a range of possibilities on how to achieve this, but we need to get it right this time.
Is a one-time mint the answer? Or over 5 years? Are the rewards vesting? What do we do after 5 years with new devs? What happens with income if we mint?
All open questions.
3/ But as someone with a material amount of YFI, I do get tired of being treated like some sort of asshole bagholder.
I just don't believe in taking reckless impulsive action without proper analysis when it comes to creating long-term incentives & necessary checks & balances.
1/ While I appreciate the spirit in which this proposal is offered, I would not support it with the current parameters.
Income is core to the $YFI value prop. Eliminating it entirely would be a bad call, IMO. But creating a mechanism for intelligent reinvestment makes sense.
2/ Simply buying $YFI with all protocol income and putting it into a governance-controlled fund sounds good on paper, but it would create a massive pot of money which people would fight over on a monthly or quarterly basis.
Who would govern the distribution of these funds?
3/ In the current model, some amount of income from the Treasury goes to grants. IMO, the distribution of these grants thus far has been extremely informal.
Have the grants incentivized gainful development around the protocol? Maybe in some cases, but how much?
It's NOT users, app devs, investors, or miners directly. And it's NOT any firm (though they may be paid by them).
They work FOR the *public good* that is Ethereum. They administer it, but it is all of the others who give it value.
2/ IMO, public goods like Ethereum should be provided consistent with a mission.
And in ways that seek to 1) maximize broad benefits/end-use, 2) minimize broad harm, and 3) judiciously & transparently assign concentrated benefits (only if required to administer the good itself).
3/ Providing a public good like Ethereum to a broad swathe of stakeholders who make use of it every day isn't easy.
It requires exercising real judgement, making complex trade-off decisions.
Peaceful articulation of disagreement with decisions is part of that process.
Now that users can get paid in BAT for viewing ads in @brave, I expect that there is a decent chance it will be the most widely used "dapp" within the next 6 to 12 months- even if it is basically just a L2 micropayment rail with settlement available to the Ethereum main net.
@brave I've switched over to @brave on most of my devices and I'm pretty impressed with how clean and fast it is. I choose not to view the ads, but many will- and get paid for it. BAT / Ethereum will be the first non-speculative exposure many have to crypto.
@brave And I expect it will likely be especially popular among kids and teens (i.e., future trend-setters) who will love the idea of "making money" just for browsing the web.