I do times in between tweets. Looking at the 1st Marine Division. So we have this at 16:51 today. Then the second one at 13:25 yesterday. So drops 2716, 1636, 1986.
2716. Talks about (face value) ramp up attacks against the boards. Notice the error on the bottom? Nothing now, next slide it makes it pop though.
1636. I had to make a note of this. Find the link and "error". You'll have to notice the missing "S" on the term "class program". We can tie this back to the last drop as it was a "S"pelling error?
Ok 1986 is a bit different. Conspiracy is a term that is overlapped, that is why I underlined it, not to mention the risk tied to Cue at the start of this. I dunno, just observations.
Alright think that will wrap it up. @ThreadReaderApp, please unroll. Any errors in transposition or math let me know please, DM's are fine.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I do times in between tweets, and honestly I'm a little upset leaving CQBrown out to dry for the day! Look at this bad larry with that "pepe pose" on the ladder. Time stamps as follows, 'leadership'change the basis for comparison. 9:04 this morning, 13:15 on the 22nd.
The difference looks like this. So 1949, 1189, then ran backwards is 4317, not that there isn't other paths you can't take with this.
1949. Now it looks pretty plain but I marked that image up for a reason. Strikes me as a simalrity, maybe it's just me.
I do times in between tweets, plug the numbers back into the boards. Sometimes I notes some differences, ultimately it's always up to the user to discern for themselves. Look at US Army Cent. These two, today at 20:37, yesterday at 10:14am.
I do times in between tweets. Take the variation, plug it back into the drops. Holy cow doesn't twitter just hate it! Looking to the Navy now. We all have a part to play! This at 16:00 subtracted from the second tweet, at
The difference looks like this. Now I got a little fuss about that 355 drop and I'll show you why. Based on my very last thread. 954 in particular. No worries I will illustrate.
Ok last thread started off (1 of 22) 2630. I want to do a side by side. 2630 from the previous, 954 from the previous and also 355 of course. Look at those numerics! That snip on 355, has a 44 in it, just sayin.
I do times inbetween tweets, plug that back into the drops. Using the NG for this one. So 14:30 today, minus yesterday at 12:00. We can see both are related, vaccines, Maryland Guard, that's why I chose these two.
The times look like this. We just plug those numbers back into the boards. So 26hours30minutes is 2630. So on and so forth. 1590, 954
2630 is such, I'll do a side by side of the 3 after, with some comparisons and questions.
I do time inbetween tweets, looking at the NH National Guard, as I am close, lots of heli's. These two tweets. So 18:34 today, this one also from today at 12:13pm. Difference looks like this. (next slide)
Used these three times, seems contant, less variables then the ones with "."s. Face value looks like the first snip below. I wanted to try something else likewise. So I took our base numbers the largest number is seconds, then subtracted and added them, then subtracted...
and added them once more. Our first set to run will be our "clean" face value times. (This is just done out of curiosity by the way).
I do times inbetween tweets. Lets look to the 101st. So 17:55 today, in comparison, AA service members. Yesterday at 19:05. The difference looks as such. 22hours and 50minute, then minutes variation and seconds variation. 2250, 1370, 822.
Fortunate that they are all small. Just do a side by side.
So the red, noticed the 1,3,9 in the timestamp, leaving a 25 in the middle. Second time I reffed LifeLog (Blue) today, 12|21|51|51. Yellow is both the highlights from the first drop added to 23.
The green is assuming run log is reffing that LifeLog image zero of 12pm (think the date was 4.4.) So that would just leave the TS. 706. Also prompted me to view 1906 as that is the time. I'll do 1906 first then close, not that there isn't more to be done! (opinion)