Tweet

DarkOwhitE

Follow @EOwhit

23 Jan, 7 tweets, 3 min read

I do times in between tweets. Take the variation, plug it back into the drops. Holy cow doesn't twitter just hate it! Looking to the Navy now. We all have a part to play! This at 16:00 subtracted from the second tweet, at

The difference looks like this. Now I got a little fuss about that 355 drop and I'll show you why. Based on my very last thread. 954 in particular. No worries I will illustrate.

Ok last thread started off (1 of 22) 2630. I want to do a side by side. 2630 from the previous, 954 from the previous and also 355 of course. Look at those numerics! That snip on 355, has a 44 in it, just sayin.

Now 235. Not to negate anything, just want users to implore for themselves.

Now well do 114 as well as 1140. It is a Fantasy Land currently. The mil is rolled out. Just sayin.

1140 is the last. Has the "error" been corrected, if you follow my previous threads, you understand why this sticks out to me as well. Overlap, across multiple agencies, seems like a plan.

@ThreadReaderApp

@ThreadReaderApp, please unroll. Any errors in math or transposition, please let me know!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @EOwhit

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

25 Jan

I do times inbetween tweets, plug them back into the boards. Looking to US Army Central for this one. So 8:27 this morning, subtracted from 23rd, at 20:37 time in between looks like the 3rd snip. So drops, 3550, 2150, 129, 129|0|.

3550. Syntax strikes me with the drop "27_yes" something like that.

2150, that 1-99 mark reminds me of this 9/11 ref, we also have the Patriot Day, and FREEDOM mark? Dunno just strikes me.

Read 5 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

24 Jan

I do times in between tweets, and honestly I'm a little upset leaving CQBrown out to dry for the day! Look at this bad larry with that "pepe pose" on the ladder. Time stamps as follows, 'leadership'change the basis for comparison. 9:04 this morning, 13:15 on the 22nd.

The difference looks like this. So 1949, 1189, then ran backwards is 4317, not that there isn't other paths you can't take with this.

1949. Now it looks pretty plain but I marked that image up for a reason. Strikes me as a simalrity, maybe it's just me.

Read 6 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

24 Jan

I do times in between tweets, plug the numbers back into the boards. Sometimes I notes some differences, ultimately it's always up to the user to discern for themselves. Look at US Army Cent. These two, today at 20:37, yesterday at 10:14am.

Differences look like this.

So 3423 looks like this.

Read 7 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

23 Jan

I do times inbetween tweets, plug that back into the drops. Using the NG for this one. So 14:30 today, minus yesterday at 12:00. We can see both are related, vaccines, Maryland Guard, that's why I chose these two.

The times look like this. We just plug those numbers back into the boards. So 26hours30minutes is 2630. So on and so forth. 1590, 954

2630 is such, I'll do a side by side of the 3 after, with some comparisons and questions.

Read 7 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

23 Jan

I do times in between tweets. Looking at the 1st Marine Division. So we have this at 16:51 today. Then the second one at 13:25 yesterday. So drops 2716, 1636, 1986.

2716. Talks about (face value) ramp up attacks against the boards. Notice the error on the bottom? Nothing now, next slide it makes it pop though.

1636. I had to make a note of this. Find the link and "error". You'll have to notice the missing "S" on the term "class program". We can tie this back to the last drop as it was a "S"pelling error?

Read 5 tweets

DarkOwhitE

@EOwhit

20 Jan

I do time inbetween tweets, looking at the NH National Guard, as I am close, lots of heli's. These two tweets. So 18:34 today, this one also from today at 12:13pm. Difference looks like this. (next slide)

Used these three times, seems contant, less variables then the ones with "."s. Face value looks like the first snip below. I wanted to try something else likewise. So I took our base numbers the largest number is seconds, then subtracted and added them, then subtracted...

and added them once more. Our first set to run will be our "clean" face value times. (This is just done out of curiosity by the way).

Read 6 tweets

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Share this page!

DarkOwhitE

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @EOwhit

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Like this author's thread?