So could the Putin regime order the special police, the broader national guard, and regular police to round up 10,000 protestors, and adopt Gestapo-like tactics on them?
At this stage, no- the regime would consider that an act of existential self harm.
The regime can take extreme steps with individuals, e.g. Navalny. But it's not ready to universalise this to all citizens.
Moreover, it can't. The bodies of state responsible for organised violence in Russia compete with one another, & aren't part of a vertical system.
(5/21)
Could Navalny himself benefit form this conflict? Absolutely!
@GlebPavlovsky, an ex Putin strategist, said this week that there is conflict at the heart of the regime between civilians and military/security folks about how to handle Navalny.
Pavlovsky says this is elevated Putin himself, who can now assert himself by arbitrating between the two teams. So far Putin has gone with the military/security folks.
But the civilian folks are pointing out that so far the military/security folks are messing up.
(7/21)
Back to the protests. There is a paradoxical sense in which citizens are less open to state violence in an authoritarian state than they are in a democracy.
Even the 'defund the police' case in the US still grants the police considerable legitimacy.
Putin has called the collapse of the USSR 'the greatest geo political catastrophe of the 20th century'. He is acutely aware that killing protestors - whether in the Soviet Union, or in the Ukraine, or Belarus - can undermine a regime.
In 2019 Moscow saw the largest public protests since the early 1990s. This was after the national guard engaged in violence against a smaller group of protestors (protesting a fixed election to the Moscow Duma).
But there is a 'but' to everything said above. The regime is keen to threaten that it will do the things I have argued it can't/won't do to dissuade protestors from coming out.
The preference is usually to issue these threats indirectly.
Everything we have said above is magnified if the protestors are under 18.
The regime has been esp keen to scare not just school children but parents and relatives about all kinds of fictional but nightmarish, including the use of fire arms.
Protestors who don't carry a placard, aren't the last to leave, and protest peacefully, will get home safely the night of the protest in the majority of cases.
What happens to those who are arrested? Typically they will sit in a police van, which may remain parked for hours until it is fully loaded with arrested protestors.
And a smaller minority will face more serious charges reserved for violent rioting. Unfortunately, these charges will likely be applied arbitrarily, and they can be ruinous for a career or education.
You need a capacity tell apart the superficial from the profound to healthily enjoy #Pavarotti.
1967🎼 Covent Garden, 90 second listen: 1/8
A superficial thing delivered on the highest level will sometimes offer you more than a profound thing delivered OK ishly. Here is more, with #Karajan, 1967. 2/8
The superficial musical values you hear ⤴️are all Pavarotti's. The life-affirming luminosity of his sound is astonishing.
But the core musical values are all Karajan's - the rhythmical skeleton, the transitions, the long line. You are getting Karajan's marble columns. 3/8
A lot of people are struggling ethically with how they feel about Boris Johnson being in ICU. Many feel empathy but also rage at him for the govt’s policy. Here are some thoughts from a philosophical standpoint. 1/13
I am going to ignore one reaction prominent on Twitter coming from critics and supporters: calling for the leadership vacuum to be filled without mentioning BoJo’s personal welfare. It is simply a disrespectful omission. 2/13
Another reaction, e.g. below, can be put aside swiftly. It is hard to parse laughing at BoJo from laughing at the awfulness of severe COVID. When @kenklippenstein tweets this, we can say that his sensibility has gone off on holiday. 3/13